Watchtower Sentinel (talk | contribs) m Removed repeated letter in sentence |
CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs) Warning |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I didn't realise that. I've redirected it to the other disambiguation page instead. I denied speedy deletion because it doesn't meet any of the [[WP:CSD|criteria for speedy deletion]], and despite being a duplicate, it was not a disambiguation page that linked to only one article. --'''[[User:Coredesat|Core]][[User talk:Coredesat|<font color="#006449">desat</font>]]''' 08:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
I didn't realise that. I've redirected it to the other disambiguation page instead. I denied speedy deletion because it doesn't meet any of the [[WP:CSD|criteria for speedy deletion]], and despite being a duplicate, it was not a disambiguation page that linked to only one article. --'''[[User:Coredesat|Core]][[User talk:Coredesat|<font color="#006449">desat</font>]]''' 08:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Hamsacharya dan's tak page== |
|||
Please refrain from restoring his page like that. Read through [[Wikipedia:User page]]. He may archive any time he want's and your continued edit warring over it is not the correct way to go about it. The information was archived and not deleted and there is now way he will be blocked over it so I have also removed the invalid warning. Also read [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule]] as you are in violation of that. [[User:CambridgeBayWeather|CambridgeBayWeather]] [[User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather|(Talk)]] 22:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:36, 21 March 2007
Hello, why are you attempting to delete the kriya yoga disambiguation page and remove it from the kriya yoga page? I put the justification in the talk page, and never heard any discussion from you. My edit of the kriya yoga page was not deceptive- there was bona fide vandalism from an anonymous user. Can you clarify your intent please? --Hamsacharya dan 02:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi there, your edit was deceptive because instead of restoring the article to how it was before it has been vandalized you reverted it to an older edit by Kkrystian (17:30, 5 March 2007), which contains your Kriya Yoga (disambiguation) nonsense. Following your lead I reverted it to the latest version by Kkrystian (09:40, 10 March 2007).
- Your agenda is crystal clear, you are in Wikipedia to promote your cult and its leader Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath and have him recognized as an authentic guru and a valid source of Kriya Yoga, which he is not because he has no real lineage. Actually, this page lists you as an ordained teacher of the cult, and that should be enough to disqualify you from editing the article Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath because commonsense dictates that as a faithful sheep of that person it would be impossible for you to edit the article about him NPOV. And not only Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath but every article that relates to your cult's claim of authority like Kriya Yoga, Mahavatar Babaji, guru, etc. because you are only bound to repeatedly spam and vandalize them with your unacceptable insertions of Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath's name.
- I won't be surprised if you were the one who vandalized the Kriya Yoga article, using another username or a fellow cult member situated in a different location, so that you can, in the guise of protecting the article, deceptively revert it to an older version that contains your Kriya Yoga (disambiguation) nonsense (now transformed into a more fitting redirect) that links AGAIN to Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath thereby serving your personal interest. - Watchtower Sentinel 09:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
I didn't realise that. I've redirected it to the other disambiguation page instead. I denied speedy deletion because it doesn't meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion, and despite being a duplicate, it was not a disambiguation page that linked to only one article. --Coredesat 08:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Hamsacharya dan's tak page
Please refrain from restoring his page like that. Read through Wikipedia:User page. He may archive any time he want's and your continued edit warring over it is not the correct way to go about it. The information was archived and not deleted and there is now way he will be blocked over it so I have also removed the invalid warning. Also read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule as you are in violation of that. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)