→Thanks!: new section |
→Six-Day War: new section |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For stepping into a confusing situation and boldly doing the right thing. Thanks! Keep it up. [[User:Noleander|Noleander]] ([[User talk:Noleander|talk]]) 00:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC) |
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For stepping into a confusing situation and boldly doing the right thing. Thanks! Keep it up. [[User:Noleander|Noleander]] ([[User talk:Noleander|talk]]) 00:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== [[Six-Day War]] == |
|||
That material has been reverted multiple times, there's a current [[WP:AE]] review of a block over the material. You need to bring your change to the talk page to achieve consensus to add it on this article. It has been previously reverted and there is a [[WP:1RR]] restriction on the article. --[[User:Wgfinley|WGFinley]] ([[User talk:Wgfinley|talk]]) 14:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC) |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose, at their own discretion, [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|sanctions]] on any editor working on pages broadly related to the [[Arab-Israeli conflict]] if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], any expected [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standards of behavior]], or any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you continue with the behavior on [[:Six-Day War]], you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision]]. <!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> --[[User:Wgfinley|WGFinley]] ([[User talk:Wgfinley|talk]]) 14:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:06, 17 August 2010
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
FYI
You may be interested: latest tactic. TickleMeister (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC).
- Today's insight: what is "lobby" spelled backwards? Ybbol. Make it readable. Y
bobol. It figures! TickleMeister (talk) 03:16, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Mediation: Israel and the Apartheid analogy
Just an FYI, we are running a straw poll on title choices on the mediation page - see Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-04-14/Israel_and_the_apartheid_analogy#Straw_poll_on_titles. If you pitch in a vote or three, we can move this along. --Ludwigs2 06:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Warning
Stop editing my talk page messages. If you feel that I inappropriately canvassed, follow the steps outlined at our policy: Wikipedia:CANVAS#How_to_respond_to_inappropriate_canvassing. Thanks, Pantherskin (talk) 12:35, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- It's not a policy. Why don't you just rewrite the message and post at the I-P collaboration page instead ? Sean.hoyland - talk 12:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Yoni Jesner and Ahmed Khatib
The removal was done as a compromise for DYK promotion. Please see the discussion at Mbz's talk page. Gatoclass (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sometimes the compromise between a good version and a bad version is a bad version, are you seriously defending removing the quote, which nicely mirrors the quote of the section above, due to her not being able to retain the 'better than blowing up children in busses'? Unomi (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I started a request for comment on Fox News's reliability at Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources. Thank you. Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 03:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Discussion on closure of Israel and Aparthied mediation
Current consensus seems to be to move the article to Israel and Apartheid with an appropriate disambiguation line to prevent any misinterpretations. Please weigh in over the next few days. --Ludwigs2 17:14, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!
The Barnstar of Integrity | ||
For stepping into a confusing situation and boldly doing the right thing. Thanks! Keep it up. Noleander (talk) 00:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC) |
That material has been reverted multiple times, there's a current WP:AE review of a block over the material. You need to bring your change to the talk page to achieve consensus to add it on this article. It has been previously reverted and there is a WP:1RR restriction on the article. --WGFinley (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you continue with the behavior on Six-Day War, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision. --WGFinley (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)