Prester John (talk | contribs) ANI notice |
Raymond arritt (talk | contribs) →ANI notice: warning |
||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
Please feel free to join the thread I have started about you at the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|ANI]]. [[User:Prester John|Prester John]] <sup> -([[User talk:Prester John|Talk to the Hand]])</sup> 01:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
Please feel free to join the thread I have started about you at the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|ANI]]. [[User:Prester John|Prester John]] <sup> -([[User talk:Prester John|Talk to the Hand]])</sup> 01:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
==Identity of anonymous editors== |
|||
You may not be aware of it, but posting personal information on editors who have not voluntarily self-disclosed, whether that information is verifiable or speculative, is not acceptable. This is your first and only warning on the matter. [[User:Raymond arritt|Raymond Arritt]] 01:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:18, 1 October 2007
Welcome to my talk page, where you are welcome to leave a message at the bottom of this page for any reason at all and I will attempt to respond ASAP. I try to remember to respond on your talk page, and I mostly do, but if you leave a message here and for some reason i'm not replying, perhaps check back here from time to time :-)
My edit count.
There is no cabal. Mmmm, cabal...
Now at AFD. Recurring dreams 11:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Just fyi it seems Joe has changed his name to: User:Single16+Sections Cheers, WikiTownsvillian 04:45, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Andrew Fisher
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Andrew Fisher you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 2 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Pursey Talk | Contribs 11:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Timeshift, just ask if there's anything I can do to help over the review period. Good Luck! WikiTownsvillian 11:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations!!! WikiTownsvillian 10:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thankyou you two! Timeshift 11:02, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
graph
Neither, its only useful on articles about the government as a whole not either individual person. Gnangarra 11:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Wikimedia commons
It all goes automatic. If there is no image on en.wikipedia with the name it automaticaly uses the Commons image. I deleted the Wikipedia version for you. If you have any more images you want to move to Commons you can add {{copy to commons}} or you can msg me and I can let a bot do it like I did with the previous image(much easier and faster). Garion96 (talk) 20:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Request for comment
Hello. I was wondering if you would like to contribute to this discussion to help in coming to a consensus, which is an important thing to do before the federal election. Thanks! Frickeg 23:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Copyright
It's still 1945. While images published prior to the latter date are public domain in Australia, they are not public domain in the United States due to the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. Any Australian images taken prior to 1945 are public domain in both, which is why we can use them on Wikipedia. Rebecca 05:23, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Re: commons ok
I've gone through and tagged photographs that had a clear source and were taken prior to 1955. I'm not sure about the paintings from geocities (this one, in particular). Also, Image:WhitRAAF.JPG is an official document with a fair use rationale. The {{PD-Australia-CC}} copyright tag on images will use the generic commons:template:PD-Australia tag. Cheers, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pollchart-tpp.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Pollchart-tpp.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
National Party of Australia
I've changed the table you added in National Party of Australia to a horizontal one - I think it is much easier to compare the results from election to election this way, and it doesn't cut out the body of the article. You may wish to change it to be more appealing to the eye or to double-check the results, which I copied from your own previous table. Cheers, George1966 07:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I've been having trouble uploading images for National Party politicians - User:Sarah deleted most of them and then restored them when I resent an email to OTRS. Could you please advise me on what to do with the image for Damian Drum? Thanks, George1966 07:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. George1966 00:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Images
Hi Timeshift, I've got to say congratulations, despite your frustrations it is great you still persist with your quest on bringing images to wikipedia! On a side note I just noticed that in the non cropped pic of KR & AB the other person in the photo is Grace Grace, the new candidate for Electoral district of Brisbane Central. Funny how these things end up three for the price of one. Cheers, WikiTownsvillian 11:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Labour Party image
I had indeed seen the image and plan to spend some more time trying to put names to faces. Also, top job on the Andrew Fisher article. --Roisterer 00:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Howard economic management
I started a discussion about the John Howard Economic Management section, that some people appear to be edit waring over. Maybe you are interested in discussing it. Link: Talk:John_Howard#Economic_Management_section_biased. Cheers, --Lester2 00:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Labour Day in Australia image
Your image seems to come from the future. ;-) The Labour Day 2007 has not yet happened. --Kakaotasse 10:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Downer family
Downer family, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Downer family satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Downer family and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Downer family during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Jreferee t/c 14:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Labor/Labour
Your becoming a cynic Timeshift :) WikiTownsvillian 08:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Have done - just needed to add "|state = uncollapsed" to it. Number 57 11:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I noticed you rv-ing an edit over on Family First Party, and so I started a topic on the talk page, and I'd like your input. Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 23:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
ANI notice
Please feel free to join the thread I have started about you at the ANI. Prester John -(Talk to the Hand) 01:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Identity of anonymous editors
You may not be aware of it, but posting personal information on editors who have not voluntarily self-disclosed, whether that information is verifiable or speculative, is not acceptable. This is your first and only warning on the matter. Raymond Arritt 01:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)