→Uninvolved Admin: new section |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Hi again, Swarm! Quick question – is there any "minimum qualification" for being granted [[WP:Pending changes reviewer|Pending changes reviewer]] status, like there is with [[WP:Rollback|Rollback]]? Or will anyone who has demonstrated they're not a vandalism account be granted Reviewer status upon request? I'm looking at the 'Becoming a reviewer' section, and I'm not seeing any mention of a specific "minimum edit count" or anything, but I was wondering if there's any "informal" qualification that's used here. Thanks in advance! --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 18:48, 18 July 2015 (UTC) |
Hi again, Swarm! Quick question – is there any "minimum qualification" for being granted [[WP:Pending changes reviewer|Pending changes reviewer]] status, like there is with [[WP:Rollback|Rollback]]? Or will anyone who has demonstrated they're not a vandalism account be granted Reviewer status upon request? I'm looking at the 'Becoming a reviewer' section, and I'm not seeing any mention of a specific "minimum edit count" or anything, but I was wondering if there's any "informal" qualification that's used here. Thanks in advance! --[[User:IJBall|IJBall]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/IJBall|contribs]] • [[User talk:IJBall|talk]])</small> 18:48, 18 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
:Not really; the spirit of the law is essentially that pending changes reviewer should pretty much be granted to anyone who can be trusted to edit normally. Any responsible editor who wants it should be granted it without issue. There are no special qualifications such as minimum edit count or previous experience. [[User:Swarm|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.0em 0.9em black'><big>'''S'''</big><small>'''''warm'''''</small></span>]] [[User talk:Swarm|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em red'><sup>'''''we ♥ our hive'''''</sup></span>]] 03:41, 19 July 2015 (UTC) |
:Not really; the spirit of the law is essentially that pending changes reviewer should pretty much be granted to anyone who can be trusted to edit normally. Any responsible editor who wants it should be granted it without issue. There are no special qualifications such as minimum edit count or previous experience. [[User:Swarm|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.0em 0.0em 0.9em black'><big>'''S'''</big><small>'''''warm'''''</small></span>]] [[User talk:Swarm|<span style='color:black;text-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em red'><sup>'''''we ♥ our hive'''''</sup></span>]] 03:41, 19 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Uninvolved Admin == |
|||
Hi Swarm, |
|||
I would request you to consider giving your opinion, as an uninvolved Admin, on an ARCA discussion featuring me: |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_Imposition_of_an_Arbitration_Enforced_Sanction_against_me_by_Bishonen [[User:Soham321|Soham321]] ([[User talk:Soham321|talk]]) 00:33, 21 July 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:33, 21 July 2015
Template:Archive box collapsible
|
| ||||
Swarm
Home —— Talk —— Email —— Contribs —— Awards —— Dash
My RfA
Thank for !voting at my recent RfA. You voted Oppose so you get only one cookie, but a nice one. (Better luck next time.) |
Question, re: Pending changes reviewer status
Hi again, Swarm! Quick question – is there any "minimum qualification" for being granted Pending changes reviewer status, like there is with Rollback? Or will anyone who has demonstrated they're not a vandalism account be granted Reviewer status upon request? I'm looking at the 'Becoming a reviewer' section, and I'm not seeing any mention of a specific "minimum edit count" or anything, but I was wondering if there's any "informal" qualification that's used here. Thanks in advance! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:48, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
- Not really; the spirit of the law is essentially that pending changes reviewer should pretty much be granted to anyone who can be trusted to edit normally. Any responsible editor who wants it should be granted it without issue. There are no special qualifications such as minimum edit count or previous experience. Swarm we ♥ our hive 03:41, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Uninvolved Admin
Hi Swarm, I would request you to consider giving your opinion, as an uninvolved Admin, on an ARCA discussion featuring me:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_Imposition_of_an_Arbitration_Enforced_Sanction_against_me_by_Bishonen Soham321 (talk) 00:33, 21 July 2015 (UTC)