→Exceeded 3RR: sp |
→3RR: fo |
||
Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
Stop with the unhatting. You're over 3RR. [[User:ForbiddenRocky|ForbiddenRocky]] ([[User talk:ForbiddenRocky|talk]]) 18:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC) |
Stop with the unhatting. You're over 3RR. [[User:ForbiddenRocky|ForbiddenRocky]] ([[User talk:ForbiddenRocky|talk]]) 18:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC) |
||
:Fuck off. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush#top|talk]]) 18:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Exceeded 3RR == |
== Exceeded 3RR == |
Revision as of 18:25, 23 December 2015
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
regarding meenas
If I edit the page in my own words and use the information from the source then I think I am not violating Wikipedia copyright laws . So if next time I edit that page I hope it will not get reverted by any editor. Thanks 786 (talk) 12:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- If you use your own words then of course you would not be breaching WP:COPYRIGHT. - Sitush (talk) 09:00, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your cooperation 786 (talk) 18:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Iyengars. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- samtar whisper 16:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- See the article talk page. See the article history. See User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. See ya. - Sitush (talk) 16:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- It's winter (at the northern hemisphere), and the silly season has started, right? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:43, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. I was hoping that JJ or Samtar would have a word. They might get through to the editor better than I would.
Joshua Jonathan I have no idea what qualifies as the silly season outside the UK but here it is often used to refer to the weird news hiatus that happens during the long summer parliamentary recess: news media end up filling space with all sorts of stuff that wouldn't usually make the cut. Outside of the media, I'm rather included to think that the UK silly season lasts pretty much all year round: never a day goes by when I don't see at least a dozen examples of daftness in real life ... and doubtless I commit some myself! - Sitush (talk) 17:43, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. I was hoping that JJ or Samtar would have a word. They might get through to the editor better than I would.
I was busy, arguing with a Sri Lankanese orthodox Buddhist who was shocked by some scholarly insights. Montanabw used the phrase "silly season," of soemthing similar (I'm Dutch, after all, not British) with regards to the higher incidence of conflicts at Wikipedia during the (northern hemisphere) winter. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)I do say "silly season" as my own neologism for those periods when WP seems particularly prone to ridiculous nonsense. I personally attribute it to seasonal affective disorder — I don't know what they do with daylight savings time in UK and other nations, but here in the US, they keep pushing it later and later, with an abrupt change with a turn of the clock from what feels like a normal day to darkness by 5:00 pm (at least at the latitude I live) in early November, which absolutely wreaks havoc with circadian rhythms. It also worsens again in about March, which I attribute to cabin fever or something. Bleech. Montanabw(talk) 18:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
- This is a well-documented online phenomenon going back to Usenet days, on which Wikipedia inevitably has an article; it's generally considered an artefact of the timings of the academic year dumping a new batch of clueless know-it-alls into the wild every September, coupled with the dates on which people traditionally get new electronic hardware and the cold North American winters making casual users more likely to stay indoors and do things online. (MBW, you're aware that "dark at 5.00 pm" sounds like an endless summer from the perspective of Europe? Today's sunrise/set times for London are 0753 and 1551 respectively. Although we do get seven hour nights in summer to compensate.) ‑ Iridescent 00:08, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- My view is that September is pretty calm, it's the holidays and around March that I think "teh wiki" seems to go off its rocker, (I think it's the speed of encroaching dark, personally...) but yes, I do sometimes forget that cold, northern Montana is, nonetheless, at the same latitude as France or Switzerland, but today our sunrise/set is 8:02 am and 4:39 PM (1639 on a 24-hr clock) so yes, you do have a few more degrees north latitude (though we like to joke about being halfway to the North Pole here -- most of the Wyoming border is at about 45 N latitude and the Canadian border is at 49 N latitude). But nonetheless, it does seem the insanity is cyclical... somehow! Montanabw(talk) 08:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Can you input on the use of a Feminist book on the talk page?VictoriaGraysonTalk 23:23, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- My apologies for the delay. That article has, and will continue to have, a heap of problems. The likelihood is that it will never get close to being encyclopaedic simply because it involves the dread word - caste. However, sources are sources and if there is a dispute regarding reliability etc then I guess WP:RSN is the way to go. This assumes that RSN has not been socio-politically hijacked like so many other areas of Wikipedia of late. I'm probably best keeping out of the specific discussion: people are now targeting me both on- and off-wiki with regard to ludicrous claims that have snowballed since a certain ArbCom case. I've no idea if I am a feminist because the word has so many interpretations but I am certainly not the misogynist that the idiots claim and I try to treat sources on merit. And I support the desire for "equality" generally, being one of those who has suffered the effects of "inequality" since birth.
- As an analogy, it is perfectly ok to use, say, sources written by the Marxist school of history provided that due weight is observed. Kathleen Gough is an example of a reliable source who quite stridently pursued a particular line. The same, in principle, applies here. The key is a combination of NPOV and RS. - Sitush (talk) 00:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
lodhi
why you remove my article! fist this is hindu community not a muslim?
seacond your all imformation is worng! Please verify it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prajput27 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Gurjar
Hi Sitush, I believe this [1] could be kept per WP:KEEP, even if we don't agree with it. It is properly sourced! Regards, kashmiri TALK 16:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, I am not aware of nor did I follow the history of your interation with that editor! kashmiri TALK 17:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- I am confused. The article is not up for deletion, which is the scenario that WP:KEEP addresses. In any event, there is a long-established consensus that we avoid the Raj era caste sources and I rather thought Saladin1987 had been told that previously. - Sitush (talk) 17:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- I meant WP:PRESERVE, sorry. Ok, clear re Raj sources, although I recall Saladin1987 quoted also a few newer publications. In any case, I think it would be fair to alert the reader in some way that the various theories on Gurjars' origin included origin in Georgia etc. Even if now discredited, such theories are more fittinh here than pseudo-linguistic speculations funnily named "linguistic theories" in the subsequent para. kashmiri TALK 01:54, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- I am confused. The article is not up for deletion, which is the scenario that WP:KEEP addresses. In any event, there is a long-established consensus that we avoid the Raj era caste sources and I rather thought Saladin1987 had been told that previously. - Sitush (talk) 17:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
what are raj era sources, general cunningham is a famous historian, how an we deny his sources? and where does it mention on wikipedia that to remove information based on era sources. Please provide a suitable answer behind removing all that informationSaladin1987 05:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Pre-1950 scholarship doesn't meet the modern standards of rigour. So we avoid them. In this particular case, however, I think the first paragraph is quite ok. It is properly attributed, and our state of knowledge hasn't improved much since then. But it would be better to find contemporary sources that say the same thing. - Kautilya3 (talk) 09:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
I agree with it so whatever part of information is acceptable should be added to the article. Gujjars are a big community but this article is pretty small and is more inclined towards hindu gurjars not muslim gujjars which are majority
Komati
Are Komati_caste and Komati (caste) the same?--Vin09 (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes. And also Arya Vaishya. There is some recent discussion at Talk:Arya Vaishya but it is pretty mangled due to yet another purveyor of WP:OR. - Sitush (talk) 12:45, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Population of Thevar/mukkulathor
Population of Thevar/mukkulathor by Times of India news agency
http://m.timesofindia.com/city/chennai/Rice-scheme-has-hit-their-income/articleshow/7938033.cms VikiAT (talk) 08:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Sock puppet
About this edit I guess User:MANI18 with User:WP MANIKHANTA are socks.--Vin09 (talk) 11:33, 15 December 2015 (UTC) I got an answer at User_talk:Arjayay#Sock_puppet.--Vin09 (talk) 11:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
History
Could you even check Kolletikota page History section?--Vin09 (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
- Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this messageVictoriaGraysonTalk 02:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
It's that season again...
Happy Saturnalia | ||
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk17:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC) |
About Telugu Castes page:
Your personal opinion is immaterial, according to government source the caste name is Kshatriya not rajus.Government mentions rajus by the name of "Kshatriya" and nowhere "Raju" term is used.Then about Rajus caste, they are forward caste in Andhra Pradesh clearly mentioned in 43rd page in source, are you a fool why you don't understand,if wikipedia is your website then delete "Kshatriya" and mention as Raju in forward castes list in that page.Also Reddy caste is missing in that list which is also a forward caste in Andhra Pradesh.Don't act like a cunning culprit.I hope you understand.
- Indeed the source does not mention Raju by name and that is why we do not. Similarly, Reddy is not mentioned. I've no idea why the government even persists with the charade unless they are unduly influenced by the Raju community: academic consensus is that neither the Vaishya nor Kshatriya varnas ever existed in south India. - Sitush (talk) 18:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- You fool!!! Some sects of Kshatriyas & Vaishyas, migrated from North India & settled in South India several hundreds of years ago i.e. < 500 A.D. which were written in many books & also accepted by historians.Kshatriyas in India are Rajputs & Rajus & six other castes, in all eight communities stated by Kumar Suresh Singh.Your consensus that "Kshatriyas & Vaishyas never existed in South India" is nothing but an agreement of several poisonous minds just for vandalizing articles & suppressing the truth and misguiding people. You & your dogs(admins who are your partners in vandalizing) are the ones who create consensus and are day by day spoiling the reputation of wikipedia.
- Go to hell you culprits...
Greetings
- Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
3RR
Stop with the unhatting. You're over 3RR. ForbiddenRocky (talk) 18:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Exceeded 3RR
I've just exceeded 3RR at Talk:Gamergate controversy. Fed up of having to watch the cabal policing there. I know I'll be blocked but someone has to make a stand against the SPAs, the vested interests etc. - Sitush (talk) 18:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)