→January 2024: Reply Tag: Reply |
Firefangledfeathers (talk | contribs) →January 2024: Reply Tag: Reply |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
:It is especially important to use edit summaries when reverting the good-faith contributions of other editors. [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Firefangledfeathers|contribs]]) 22:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
:It is especially important to use edit summaries when reverting the good-faith contributions of other editors. [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Firefangledfeathers|contribs]]) 22:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
::it isnt good faith he removed the collages by mass [[User:Setarip|Setarip]] ([[User talk:Setarip#top|talk]]) 13:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC) |
::it isnt good faith he removed the collages by mass [[User:Setarip|Setarip]] ([[User talk:Setarip#top|talk]]) 13:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::They removed the collages en masse because they believe that was an improvement of the articles. It was good-faith, though disruptive. [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Firefangledfeathers|contribs]]) 14:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:20, 23 January 2024
January 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of serial killers by number of victims have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of serial killers by number of victims was changed by Setarip (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863109 on 2022-01-06T19:40:44+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:40, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Camargo Barbosa. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically
I DID NOT, I ADDED A PHOTOGRAPH OF HIM IN THE 1950'S AND YOU DELETED IT FOR COPYRIGHT FFS THE GUY WHO TOOK IT IS PROBABLY DEAD reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Daniel Camargo Barbosa was changed by Setarip (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857619 on 2022-01-06T19:47:02+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User:Glaceonstan. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —C.Fred (talk) 00:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- its proved hes a furry Setarip (talk) 00:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, didn't even notice someone had added misinformation to my page. Thanks for that Glaceonstan (talk) 01:09, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Interdimensional Beings
hi
hi Setarip (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
The Most Boring Day in History moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to The Most Boring Day in History. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
January 2024
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 14:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- It is especially important to use edit summaries when reverting the good-faith contributions of other editors. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- it isnt good faith he removed the collages by mass Setarip (talk) 13:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- They removed the collages en masse because they believe that was an improvement of the articles. It was good-faith, though disruptive. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- it isnt good faith he removed the collages by mass Setarip (talk) 13:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)