→Please comment on Talk:Dana Loesch: new section |
EtienneDolet (talk | contribs) →AA2 advisory: new section Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 1,079: | Line 1,079: | ||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Dana Loesch#rfc_867EB4B|this request for comment on '''Talk:Dana Loesch''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 86836 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Dana Loesch#rfc_867EB4B|this request for comment on '''Talk:Dana Loesch''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 86836 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |
||
== AA2 advisory == |
|||
{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' |
|||
'''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[Armenia]], [[Azerbaijan]], or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2|here]]. |
|||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ...Just wanted to let you know about this. The stuff about the map may be understood by some editors as genocide denial due to what RSs have said about the term ''Eastern Anatolia''. This has been explained on the talk page. [[User:EtienneDolet|Étienne Dolet]] ([[User talk:EtienneDolet|talk]]) 04:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:49, 6 May 2018
15:19:27, 15 June 2017 review of submission by TooTallSid
- TooTallSid (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Dosho Port ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I reread all the suggested Wikipedia pages about article creation. I tuned up my refs and citations. I asked "a question on the Articles for creation help desk".. I understand the respond that I got from worldbruce, but it just doesn't seem to fit with the world of American Zen. This is a small world with an internal reputational system different than that espoused by worldbruce. I reviewed a number of related Zen master Wikipedia pages:
They seem to have a comparable level of notability and sources.
Is there no place for American Zen in Wikipedia?
16:19:21, 17 June 2017 review of submission by EditorSTW
Hello,
I was wondering why you declined the Save the Water (STW) Wikipedia page submission. If you could provide specific reasons, that would be great!
Suraj
Trouted
You've been whacked with a WikiMinnow..
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you might have done something silly. |
You got hit with trout god damn it stop wasting your food
Irish Artist Dylan Walshe
Hey,
Thanks for your feedback. I have added new reference links. They should suffice. The j's again for your time. The Irish Artist is well known internationally, but especially in Ireland.
Thanks
Please comment on Talk:Husan
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Husan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:David Hogg (activist)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Hogg (activist). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1953 Iranian coup d'état. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Alepotrypa cave
Hello! Your submission of Alepotrypa cave at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
NOTHERE...
So, let me ask you, do you think this IP who made an edit-summary like this is here to contribute the encyclopedia in a neutral manner? I mean, you tell me. Étienne Dolet (talk) 20:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- EtienneDolet Serious behavioral problems like WP:NOTHERE should be taken to ANI, you should not respond to them by reverting basic non-controversial improvements to an article. The edit updated the infobox casualty count replacing one Hurriyet source with a more recent one. There was nothing wrong with the edit itself, only some POV language in the edit summary. I can't see any legitimate reason why that edit would be reverted and you didn't provide one in your edit summary. Reverting an improvement to the article because you don't like the POV of the editor (based on the edit summary) is not an improvement to the article. Seraphim System (talk) 18:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Edits that can be considered legitimate on one hand, can be seen as POV pushing on the other. Legitimate edits can still be ascribed as POV pushing if indeed the there's a personal motive to make such a edit. Would you consider it to be POV pushing if, for example, some user in their edit-summary wrote "added info on n******" to an article about African Americans? I definitely would. 18:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- I think most admins and editors would agree that your personal disagreement with an editors POV or
personal motive
is not a justification to revert, in fact it can be grounds to sanction you - based on my interactions with you my sincere advice is to stop personalizing disputes and focus on the content of the edits and not the editor, or what you believe their "personal motive"s are. If the language on talk or in edit summaries is racist or otherwise crosses behavioral lines it needs to go to ANI, because everyone is allowed to edit until a decision is made by the community or admins that they are not.Seraphim System (talk) 19:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- I think most admins and editors would agree that your personal disagreement with an editors POV or
- Edits that can be considered legitimate on one hand, can be seen as POV pushing on the other. Legitimate edits can still be ascribed as POV pushing if indeed the there's a personal motive to make such a edit. Would you consider it to be POV pushing if, for example, some user in their edit-summary wrote "added info on n******" to an article about African Americans? I definitely would. 18:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Poland
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poland. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Legality of cannabis by country
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Legality of cannabis by country. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Abiy Ahmed Ali
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abiy Ahmed Ali. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Flag
Hi, Seraphim System.
I've noticed that you are an AfC reviewer but don't yet have the New Page Reviewer flag. Would you please consider heading over to PERM and requesting it? (check the flag requirements HERE)
As part of a larger plan to increase cooperation between New Page Patrol and Articles for creation, we are trying to get as many of the active AfC reviewers as possible under the NPR user flag (per this discussion). Unlike the AfC request list, the NPR flag carries no obligation to review new articles, so I'm not asking you to help out at New Page Patrol if you don't want to, just to request the flag.
Of course, if it is something you would be interested in, you can have a look at the NPP tutorial. Please mention that you are an active AfC reviewer in your application.
Cheers and thanks for helping out at AfC, — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:37, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
Hello Seraphim System. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia; if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
- URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
- Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
- Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
- Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Welcone to the cabal, SS. —usernamekiran(talk) 12:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Horst-Wessel-Lied
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Horst-Wessel-Lied. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment on Association Montessori Internationale - please don't delete the page - I will work on it - AMI is important because it is nearly 90 years old and it is the mother institution for the global Montessori movement - it was founded by Maria Montessori herself. It is the owner of the archive of Montessori's work.
Too late - someone else deleted it because of your tag - very frustrating. Chemical287 (talk) 19:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Pimpri-Chinchwad
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pimpri-Chinchwad. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of English monarchs
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of English monarchs. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Syria
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syria. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Osmosis RfC
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Osmosis RfC. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Colt AR-15
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Colt AR-15. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Government
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Government. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Alepotrypa cave
On 21 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alepotrypa cave, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that archaeologists believe the cultural memory of the burial site at the Alepotrypa cave may have become associated with the mythological entrance to Hades? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alepotrypa cave. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alepotrypa cave), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:CSA Steaua Bucure?ti (football)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:CSA Steaua Bucure?ti (football). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Justice Party (South Korea)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Justice Party (South Korea). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tzatziki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Dawenkou culture
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dawenkou culture. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
RE ANI
Re this comment, it is not as bad as you state (and this would not be the first or second problem in those edits) - as Palestinians all identify as part of the Arab nation (and there are also internal divisions) - the Analog for the US Senator would be changing from American to North American, or from French to European.Icewhiz (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- WP:RS or it didn't happen. Chuck Schumer identifies as Jewish, so why are you pretending that most editors would not object if a new editor started adding Jewish to the lede of articles of American Jews. I have literally seen them object, it ended with an indef (though there were other problems with that editor also). 24 edits is not very many, and I generally don't support quick indefs outside COI/new article recreation type situations, but giving new editors the impression that these types of edits are "ok" and it is like changing French to European is not helpful.Seraphim System (talk) 03:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- And not just Arabs but interloping Arabs. Which is a borderline racial sterotype that means "meddling Arabs". Please stop trying to compare this to changing American to North American. This idea that denying Palestinian identity or existence, which is what this is, is equally represented in WP:RS and thus a legitimate edit in this topic area is similar to what often gets new accounts indeff'd — I don't generally support this outside COI/AfC or get involved, but I assume that more experienced editors have seen this behavior before and seem to know what they doing when they bring the accounts to ANI — particularly for edits involving the alt-right or World War II or other far right ideologies. I don't really understand why there seems to be another standard here.Seraphim System (talk) 03:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- I was not defending this editor (heck - I placed a DS alert on his talk page) - but referring to a very narrow aspect here (and not in ANI). "Interloping" (as well as a few other points) is indeed much more problematic than Palestinain->Arab (which also has some problems - what I was trying to say was that this was not the worst aspect here). As for identifying Jews in America (which is the opposite move - identifying a sub group from the whole) - many Jews (as well as other minorities) are very wary when they are caĺled out as such instead of being referred as "normal Americans" (particularly when some elements try to do so, e.g. Triple parentheses).Icewhiz (talk) 03:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- A triple parentheses is definitely not ok but I actually don't see the problem with identifying Americans Jews as Jewish in the lede, a lot of normal Americans are multicultural ...when Haaretz dropped American and identified me as Turkish and not Turkish-American and I was kind of annoyed, but as long as it is Jewish-American, I don't think it should be a problem (but other editors may have different views). The new editor in question at this point should probably be made aware of WP:WESTBANK [1] but it looks like they have not edited since the ANI report was filed.Seraphim System (talk) 04:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- I was not defending this editor (heck - I placed a DS alert on his talk page) - but referring to a very narrow aspect here (and not in ANI). "Interloping" (as well as a few other points) is indeed much more problematic than Palestinain->Arab (which also has some problems - what I was trying to say was that this was not the worst aspect here). As for identifying Jews in America (which is the opposite move - identifying a sub group from the whole) - many Jews (as well as other minorities) are very wary when they are caĺled out as such instead of being referred as "normal Americans" (particularly when some elements try to do so, e.g. Triple parentheses).Icewhiz (talk) 03:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- And not just Arabs but interloping Arabs. Which is a borderline racial sterotype that means "meddling Arabs". Please stop trying to compare this to changing American to North American. This idea that denying Palestinian identity or existence, which is what this is, is equally represented in WP:RS and thus a legitimate edit in this topic area is similar to what often gets new accounts indeff'd — I don't generally support this outside COI/AfC or get involved, but I assume that more experienced editors have seen this behavior before and seem to know what they doing when they bring the accounts to ANI — particularly for edits involving the alt-right or World War II or other far right ideologies. I don't really understand why there seems to be another standard here.Seraphim System (talk) 03:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Judicial Watch
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Judicial Watch. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the Labour Party
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the Labour Party. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:12, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
- Discussion report: The future of portals
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
Please comment on Talk:Holocaust denial
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Holocaust denial. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Jacques Goulet
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jacques Goulet. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:"Polish death camp" controversy. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Minarchism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Minarchism. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wiki Loves Food
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 02:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Oleg Vinogradov at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Newspapers.com
Hello Seraphim System, I sent you an email about ten days ago in regards to your Newspapers.com account. I'm unable to proceed until I receive a response from you. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 19:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Cameron11598: My newspapers.com account is still active, I thought it had been renewed already? I am waiting to hear back about newspaperarchive.com — that archive starts earlier and there have been some occasions where I have wanted to check it to improve new articles about early American history. I was approved months ago but I don't think I ever received a login. Seraphim System (talk) 22:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Whops! Feel free to ignore then, for some reason I have your account on my list of accounts to process. Hmmm. I'll ping @Samwalton9 (WMF): about the Newspaperarchive.com issue. . --Cameron11598 (Talk) 19:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear that - Iazyges processes the applications for Newspaperarchive.com, and can hopefully help you with that issue. Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 10:22, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- Whops! Feel free to ignore then, for some reason I have your account on my list of accounts to process. Hmmm. I'll ping @Samwalton9 (WMF): about the Newspaperarchive.com issue. . --Cameron11598 (Talk) 19:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Abortion and the Catholic Church
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abortion and the Catholic Church. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:52, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Anatolia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anatolia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Incorporation of the Bill of Rights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:John R. Bolton
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John R. Bolton. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Louis Farrakhan
I've asked the other editor to add in better links instead of blanking the section if they have issues. Louis' views on this are well known and so the section should not be blanked if you do not like the source. Find better sources instead and work together is all I asked. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you — what confused me is that black separatism seem to be being being treated as derogatory. I agree that pulling a quote from a speech is not super precise, but I think RT is enough to add a quote about a "land of our own" to a section about black separatism, as long as there is nothing derogatory. Seraphim System (talk) 19:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Their issues seem to be your sourcing, so please try and work on the RS references. Thanks C. W. Gilmore (talk) 19:47, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Your both closer together on this issue than you know, but are coming at it from very different starting points. If possible, can you both work this out on the TP? C. W. Gilmore (talk) 19:50, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- RT has come up at RS/n but there is no consensus that it is not WP:RS and this is a video, so in my view it's pretty easy to verify that the words are coming out of Farrakhan's mouth. I will be pretty busy today re TP discussion, so I may miss it unless I'm pinged.Seraphim System (talk) 19:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Louis is a controversial figure with many followers and detractors. It is essential that everything on this article be verified with at least 2 good quality sources or it will get ripped apart by one of those groups or the other. I know it's a lot to ask, but I hope you understand the reasons why it is needed on this part of this page. Please try to continue to improve the source on this section to save us all headaches in the future, thanks C. W. Gilmore (talk) 20:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- RT has come up at RS/n but there is no consensus that it is not WP:RS and this is a video, so in my view it's pretty easy to verify that the words are coming out of Farrakhan's mouth. I will be pretty busy today re TP discussion, so I may miss it unless I'm pinged.Seraphim System (talk) 19:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Dana Loesch
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dana Loesch. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
AA2 advisory
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 ...Just wanted to let you know about this. The stuff about the map may be understood by some editors as genocide denial due to what RSs have said about the term Eastern Anatolia. This has been explained on the talk page. Étienne Dolet (talk) 04:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)