Content deleted Content added
→Mitroglou: new section |
GiantSnowman (talk | contribs) →Blocked: new section |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think the first one is, but the second one isn't. I'm not sure <u>what</u> makes them notable, I think it would be better to ask at [[WT:FOOTY]]. Cheers, [[User:MYS77|<font color="blue">MYS</font>]][[Special:Contributions/MYS77|''<font color="red">77</font>'']] [[User talk:MYS77|<sup><font color="orange">✉</font></sup>]] 14:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC) |
I think the first one is, but the second one isn't. I'm not sure <u>what</u> makes them notable, I think it would be better to ask at [[WT:FOOTY]]. Cheers, [[User:MYS77|<font color="blue">MYS</font>]][[Special:Contributions/MYS77|''<font color="red">77</font>'']] [[User talk:MYS77|<sup><font color="orange">✉</font></sup>]] 14:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Blocked == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for [[WP:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|request an unblock]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. </div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
|||
I've given you the benefit of the doubt for far too long. But your recent escalation of bitty, disruptive editing has culminated in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lu%C3%ADs_Martins&type=revision&diff=761575696&oldid=761574412 this], which is not only you removing sourced content (something I have warned you about previously) but also demonstrating your battleground mentality by blindly reverting an editor with whom you have had a long-running dispute. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 18:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:48, 23 January 2017
Mitroglou
I think the first one is, but the second one isn't. I'm not sure what makes them notable, I think it would be better to ask at WT:FOOTY. Cheers, MYS77 ✉ 14:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. I've given you the benefit of the doubt for far too long. But your recent escalation of bitty, disruptive editing has culminated in this, which is not only you removing sourced content (something I have warned you about previously) but also demonstrating your battleground mentality by blindly reverting an editor with whom you have had a long-running dispute. GiantSnowman 18:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)