Level 2 warning re. Collatz conjecture (HG) |
Shadowjams (talk | contribs) Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Collatz conjecture. (TW) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add content without citing [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] and [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|''reliable'' sources]]{{#if:Collatz conjecture|, as you did with <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_conjecture?diff=368317009 this edit]</span> to [[:Collatz conjecture]]}}. Before making any potentially controversial [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|edits]], it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article.<!-- Template:uw-huggle2 --> — <font size="4">[[User:Jeff G.|Jeff]] [[User:Jeff G./talk|G. ツ]]</font> 04:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not add content without citing [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] and [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|''reliable'' sources]]{{#if:Collatz conjecture|, as you did with <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_conjecture?diff=368317009 this edit]</span> to [[:Collatz conjecture]]}}. Before making any potentially controversial [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|edits]], it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]] and take this opportunity to add references to the article.<!-- Template:uw-huggle2 --> — <font size="4">[[User:Jeff G.|Jeff]] [[User:Jeff G./talk|G. ツ]]</font> 04:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]'''  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Collatz conjecture]]. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If the edit warring continues, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing''' without further notice. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Shadowjams|Shadowjams]] ([[User talk:Shadowjams|talk]]) 04:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:23, 16 June 2010
Welcome!
Welcome!
Hello, Rudiwiki1234~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Lisatwo 13:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Collatz
It's not sufficient to publish a link to your own paper. You need sufficient third-party validation declaring that the proof is correct. If you continue to add unsourced material, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
June 2010
Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Collatz conjecture. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. — Jeff G. ツ 04:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Collatz conjecture. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shadowjams (talk) 04:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)