Henchman 2000 (talk | contribs) |
Fish and karate (talk | contribs) You and Henchman 2000 |
||
Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
RobJ, you really need to take a step back and realise that Wikipedia does not revolve around your opinion, like you have made it clear that you think it does. You are trying to jump to a conclusion and override a conclusion posted on both sock cases. Bowsy and I do not abuse AfD and RFC debates, we contribute to them like every user is allowed to do, and if you don't like it, tough! No-one is going to change how Wikipedia works because of your opinion. [[User:Henchman 2000|Henchman 2000]] 19:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
RobJ, you really need to take a step back and realise that Wikipedia does not revolve around your opinion, like you have made it clear that you think it does. You are trying to jump to a conclusion and override a conclusion posted on both sock cases. Bowsy and I do not abuse AfD and RFC debates, we contribute to them like every user is allowed to do, and if you don't like it, tough! No-one is going to change how Wikipedia works because of your opinion. [[User:Henchman 2000|Henchman 2000]] 19:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
== You and Henchman 2000 == |
|||
:''Note that the original reference to your conduct has been archived, and is now at [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive214#Henchman_2000_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29_and_RobJ1981_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29]]''. |
|||
Hi Rob. Please try and stop bickering with Henchman 2000. If you are not able to discuss things civilly, please try not responding to anything you see as trying to provoke you, and please refrain from doing anything involving him, provoking or otherwise. I am not blaming either one of you in particular for this, and do not want to hear about whose fault it is. Just, please, step away, and calm down. I will be posting the same message on Henchman 2000's talk page, with the names revered, as this message applies to both of you, equally. You clearly have similar editing interests, and it would be so much better if you could find some common ground and work together to make Wikipedia better, as this is clearly what you wish to do. Don't let an editing dispute sour your contributions to Wikipedia. If you have any questions, or would like some advice, please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Proto|<span style="text-decoration:none">Neil</span>]] [[User_talk:Neil|<span style="text-decoration:none"><small>(not Proto ►)</small></span>]] 23:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:23, 15 March 2007
![]() Archives |
---|
Resident Evil series template
Hi RobJ,
Thank you for your edit/revert to {{Resident Evil series}}. As there is a bit of a difference in insight between A Man In Black and basically the rest of the editors, I've decided it best to discuss the inclusion/exclusion of games in the template. I would like to invite you to share your view on the matter:
Template talk:Resident Evil series#Upcoming games
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Navboxes#Inclusion / exclusion of non-released games
Thank you and happy editting
JackSparrow Ninja 00:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: Star Wars
Due to the number of reverts and resistence to the redirect a general concensus should be decided on the discussion page. Otherwise take it to WP:REDIRECT. Often the decision of a redirect is decided on WP:AfD or in a merge case. I think policy in this case may be more helpful than people just moving ahead with things that seems to be disagreed upon by some. Happy editing. Mkdwtalk 07:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Bowsy and Henchman
Having proven beyond reasonable doubt that they are separate accounts, creating a second sockpuppetry case against them looks a lot like harassment. I have deleted it. Do not pursue that line again. If you cannot prevail in your content disputes by strength of argument, start a request for comment or pursue some other means of dispute resolution. Guy (Help!) 17:39, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- While I don't think deletion of the page was necessary, I think you should wait at least a month before making a new case. –Llama mantalkcontribs 15:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Favor...
Hello, RobJ1981! Can you please sign my autograph book? Thanks! User:Cremepuff222/Signature
Reply to user:Seicer
No problem! I saw this crop up on WP:ANI which I monitor, then on WP:3RR so I thought I could add some more damning evidence :) There are numerous others that are dangerously close to 3RR as well. This ought to be fun to watch. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Looks like I misread WP:3RR. Oops. I thought it was for three edits of revert (whatever the reason), but it is four. I should have paid attention more carefully -- but it still looked to be in bad form overall. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 07:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Bowsy & Henchman
Have you tried an RfC? There is clearly a problem with their somewhat over-enthusiastic behaviour, and this may be amenable to gentle correction. Guy (Help!) 09:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
A RFC about you has started
The discussion is here: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RobJ1981 Make sure you read how it works, before you decide to post on it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bowsy (talk • contribs) 11:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC).
Sorry
I have removed the puppetry accusation from the RFC. Oh, and I have never threatened you, Henchman has. I am not trying to act like an admin. I am just trying to get the rights and respect I deserve. Bowsy (review me!) 08:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: Messedrocker's talk page
I never said I was an admin, but Isotope23, JzG and Llama man are and you are ignoring their verdicts on the situation, which will inevitably land you in trouble. Stop putting words in my mouth, if you won't let Bowsy and I do it to you, we won't let you do it to us. Practice what you preach. Henchman 2000 09:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Who is "they"?
You said "they" threaten to do things when only Henchman does. You also said "they" act like admins but when have I ever done so? Please do not say that I do things just because Henchman does. Thank you. Bowsy (review me!) 11:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Can you help me?
AMiB has started to do a whole bunch more reverting after being unblocked... I have to go to work, but I figured I needed help with this guy. Not reverting all his shit over and over, but making sure someone knows. Scumbag 20:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
The charge on the RFC
RobJ, you are being charged with violationg NPA because trying to leave users out of votes and, especially, encouraging others to do so is most definitely a personal attack. Bowsy (review me!) 11:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Re:DYK
See T:DYKT. An article can also be on DYK if it has been significantly expanded from a stub. That was the case for Pockets of resistance. Nishkid64 23:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Re:Opinion
We have never said that you must change your opinion, in fact, by accusing us of meatpuppetry, you are telling us to change our opinions. It's never going to happen unless we do it voluntarily. Once again, stop putting words in our mouths and practice what you preach, otherwise I will report you to an admin. And no, I do not act like one. Henchman 2000 19:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
New User
Hello! As a new user I have not quite figured everything wiki out just yet, and came across your name looking up the history of the article on Monsta Mack. I was wondering if you are the creator of the article, or did you just edit it? -YeLLeY511 21:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
XPW
I don't know if you're aware of the history here, but the new user is clearly banned editor JB196 who has a long term abuse report. He can't even insert a direct link to his articles on OWW any more as they are spam blacklisted, which is why he's linking to the main site. A new editor would not know about an ancient AfD for JB196's article, and the pattern of behaviour means it's clearly him. Any contributions from a banned editor are classed as vandalism, and are exemept from 3RR. Thanks. One Night In Hackney303 03:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
3RR
I appreciate your effort in ending the revert war on SummerSlam (2005) by requesting page protection, but please keep in mind the WP:3RR. Neither of you have breached 3 reversions yet, and as such are not blocked, but please do not continue to revert. Thanks, and happy editing. auburnpilot talk 06:11, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
You previously expressed a strongly-stated opinion about a video game navbox or all video game navboxes in general, or perhaps I clicked on your talk page by mistake. Whichever it is, you are invited to offer your opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Navboxes III: Son of Navboxes. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 07:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
After reading WP:Listcruft I suppose I would have to agree with the prod; it seemed like a good idea at the time though! Just wanted to check to see if you think at least the category Category:ZX Spectrum programmers is appropriate. I feel there ought to be something to group these programmers together, who always tended to have a bit of a following (perpetuated by the speccy magazines of that era). Marasmusine 22:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
List of Cars characters
I noticed you deleted the portion of video game characters on List of Cars characters. It's a rather large section that I felt needs to be discussed before deleting so much. So I brought it back and placed an Unencyclopedic tag on the section, afterwards bringing up the discussion on the article's talk page. I hope this is acceptable. Leave a note on my talk page if there's any issues. -WarthogDemon 00:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
AFD
Your voice is needed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of diss songs (2nd nomination). TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 00:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
David Bartlett
Hi, you added
[[Category:Year of birth missing|Bartlett, David]]
to David Bartlett,
but his birth year is mentioned in the article (1968). Is it in the wrong format for you? If so perhaps you could rearrange! GB 21:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing it Rob - I was a bit concerned that "Rob" might stand for Robot and may not respond to a user talk! GB 21:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Superpower cats
Since you were earlier involved in the meta-discussion on superhero categories, please comment on the issue now that it's ended up on CFD again. Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_14#Fictional_characters_by_power. >Radiant< 13:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Stop acting as though you are always right.
RobJ, you really need to take a step back and realise that Wikipedia does not revolve around your opinion, like you have made it clear that you think it does. You are trying to jump to a conclusion and override a conclusion posted on both sock cases. Bowsy and I do not abuse AfD and RFC debates, we contribute to them like every user is allowed to do, and if you don't like it, tough! No-one is going to change how Wikipedia works because of your opinion. Henchman 2000 19:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
You and Henchman 2000
- Note that the original reference to your conduct has been archived, and is now at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive214#Henchman_2000_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29_and_RobJ1981_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29.
Hi Rob. Please try and stop bickering with Henchman 2000. If you are not able to discuss things civilly, please try not responding to anything you see as trying to provoke you, and please refrain from doing anything involving him, provoking or otherwise. I am not blaming either one of you in particular for this, and do not want to hear about whose fault it is. Just, please, step away, and calm down. I will be posting the same message on Henchman 2000's talk page, with the names revered, as this message applies to both of you, equally. You clearly have similar editing interests, and it would be so much better if you could find some common ground and work together to make Wikipedia better, as this is clearly what you wish to do. Don't let an editing dispute sour your contributions to Wikipedia. If you have any questions, or would like some advice, please let me know. Thanks. Neil (not Proto ►) 23:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)