m Reverted edit by (talk) reply (talk) to last version by Renewal6 Tag: Rollback |
(talk) reply (talk | contribs) 3rr Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1187132475 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1187132475 --> |
||
== violation of three-revert rule == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:(talk) reply|(talk) reply]] ([[User talk:(talk) reply|talk]]) 10:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:19, 5 December 2023
|
|
Awards
Awards
| ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for your anti-vandalism work! Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 18:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC) |
It’s real tho
Not even kidding! It’s true! Go there yourself like I have, there’s an ancient inscription! My guide told me about. FollowerofYakub (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Request a move
pls move Pakistan Medical Commission to Pakistan Medical and Dental Council in order to reflect latest name change. Hjk57428 (talk) 14:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- I can't do it myself, for technical reasons, but I've filed a request here. Renewal6 (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Frank Morgan
Hello, how are you, im just as puzzled as what you are, why the picture was deleted from wikipedia sister project wikicommmons, greta picture and he;'s also be th at character of "The Wizard" to me and was best known for, i really do not know what th e consensus is for writing a persons birth name first or there better known names, as a lot of articles are diiferent but if we loo k at Marilyn Monroe , he see written as Marilyn Monroe first, then Norma Jean Baker next in brackets., kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.10.1 (talk) 01:57, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
violation of three-revert rule
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. (talk) reply (talk) 10:19, 5 December 2023 (UTC)