Novaseminary (talk | contribs) clear |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Don't remove valid facts simply because you don't personally like them == |
|||
I'm serious. Another edit war will happen if you do this again. I'm NOT writing it on the article talk page either. You need to stop your uptight neurotic nonsense, kid. I'm FED up with it now. You personally don't like the fact that not all "Protestants" accept or recognize the Roman Catholic "separated brethren" designation, so you'll SUPPRESS that knowledge and point, and make wholesale removals. I WON'T TOLERATE IT. Just cuz you feel there's no good source for that fact (even though there are sources all over the place that prove clearly that "Fundamentalists" etc generally don't accept the "separated brethren" label), doesn't mean that the whole paragraph should be summarily removed by you. I'm tired of you. You've had issues with this article from the get-go. I'm TIRED of you, sir. I'm serious. Any nonsense you do again, I'll simply undo. And don't whine again that I wrote on your talk page. Get over it. (I'm done being polite or civil with you, as you've proven to be unworthy of any deference or etiquette.) Again, you do this stuff again, and I'll simply undo EVERYTHING you do. You think you can remove whole things because YOU PERSONALLY DON'T LIKE THOSE THINGS?? It's not happening. It's a proven fact (and it should be noted and made known) that not all Protestants accept "separated brethren" as valid. Not sure why you have problems with that fact. But I've detected pro-Catholic bias from you from the beginning. But whatever the reason, what you did was NOT warranted. 12:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:22, 15 June 2010
Don't remove valid facts simply because you don't personally like them
I'm serious. Another edit war will happen if you do this again. I'm NOT writing it on the article talk page either. You need to stop your uptight neurotic nonsense, kid. I'm FED up with it now. You personally don't like the fact that not all "Protestants" accept or recognize the Roman Catholic "separated brethren" designation, so you'll SUPPRESS that knowledge and point, and make wholesale removals. I WON'T TOLERATE IT. Just cuz you feel there's no good source for that fact (even though there are sources all over the place that prove clearly that "Fundamentalists" etc generally don't accept the "separated brethren" label), doesn't mean that the whole paragraph should be summarily removed by you. I'm tired of you. You've had issues with this article from the get-go. I'm TIRED of you, sir. I'm serious. Any nonsense you do again, I'll simply undo. And don't whine again that I wrote on your talk page. Get over it. (I'm done being polite or civil with you, as you've proven to be unworthy of any deference or etiquette.) Again, you do this stuff again, and I'll simply undo EVERYTHING you do. You think you can remove whole things because YOU PERSONALLY DON'T LIKE THOSE THINGS?? It's not happening. It's a proven fact (and it should be noted and made known) that not all Protestants accept "separated brethren" as valid. Not sure why you have problems with that fact. But I've detected pro-Catholic bias from you from the beginning. But whatever the reason, what you did was NOT warranted. 12:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)