Guliolopez (talk | contribs) →January 2021: new section |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
{{{icon|[[Image:Stop_hand_nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]]}}} Hello. Please do not restore or add [[WP:Do not create hoaxes|hoax and nonsense]] content to Wikipedia. And/or rely or link to your own nonsense Tweets in support of such edits. As you have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wills&diff=prev&oldid=694439186 done] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Empire&type=revision&diff=691498599&oldid=688775111 previously] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Null_Island&diff=prev&oldid=1063141882 again recently]. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please [[WP:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point|do not disrupt Wikipedia]]. Editors who disrupt the project, or are otherwise [[WP:NOTHERE|not here to constructively build an encyclopedia]] will be [[WP:BLOCK|blocked from editing]]. [[User:Guliolopez|Guliolopez]] ([[User talk:Guliolopez|talk]]) 14:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC) |
{{{icon|[[Image:Stop_hand_nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]]}}} Hello. Please do not restore or add [[WP:Do not create hoaxes|hoax and nonsense]] content to Wikipedia. And/or rely or link to your own nonsense Tweets in support of such edits. As you have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wills&diff=prev&oldid=694439186 done] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Empire&type=revision&diff=691498599&oldid=688775111 previously] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Null_Island&diff=prev&oldid=1063141882 again recently]. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please [[WP:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point|do not disrupt Wikipedia]]. Editors who disrupt the project, or are otherwise [[WP:NOTHERE|not here to constructively build an encyclopedia]] will be [[WP:BLOCK|blocked from editing]]. [[User:Guliolopez|Guliolopez]] ([[User talk:Guliolopez|talk]]) 14:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC) |
||
And I thought Wikipedia was not interested in opinion... Obviously my tweets are accurate it is a proposal, it is also inexpensive and representative of goodwill something I am sure you would prefer to find in your Vegemite. I am reporting your user for opinion. Your inaccuracies should embarrass your Mother and Father. Your suggestion is to use Wikipedia to quote Wikipedia making it closed source. There was, when I joined Wikipeia a shortage of writes and editors and although I considered I mostly refrain given there are many better able to perform the research but it is not illegal to be the source of fact, and in fact when sworn it is to give consideration then to equivocate. The nonsense and disrespect I have received in response to contributions to Wikipedia make me wonder, although I know it's purpose, why any university allows its existence albeit no factual reference can come from Wikipedia because it is not verifiable and yet I find it informative as part of knowledge expiration and a good source of linked reference materials. Go shine your bollocks. |
|||
[[User:NOD32user|KING]] ([[User talk:NOD32user#top|talk]]) 15:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:23, 1 January 2022
Open:
Here I am dancing a jig I've already word.
Do and indeed reference.
KING (talk)
talk:
Discussion,
talk last checked
--KING (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
January 2021
Hello. Please do not restore or add hoax and nonsense content to Wikipedia. And/or rely or link to your own nonsense Tweets in support of such edits. As you have done previously and again recently. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Editors who disrupt the project, or are otherwise not here to constructively build an encyclopedia will be blocked from editing. Guliolopez (talk) 14:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
And I thought Wikipedia was not interested in opinion... Obviously my tweets are accurate it is a proposal, it is also inexpensive and representative of goodwill something I am sure you would prefer to find in your Vegemite. I am reporting your user for opinion. Your inaccuracies should embarrass your Mother and Father. Your suggestion is to use Wikipedia to quote Wikipedia making it closed source. There was, when I joined Wikipeia a shortage of writes and editors and although I considered I mostly refrain given there are many better able to perform the research but it is not illegal to be the source of fact, and in fact when sworn it is to give consideration then to equivocate. The nonsense and disrespect I have received in response to contributions to Wikipedia make me wonder, although I know it's purpose, why any university allows its existence albeit no factual reference can come from Wikipedia because it is not verifiable and yet I find it informative as part of knowledge expiration and a good source of linked reference materials. Go shine your bollocks.