File:TinFoilHat Superfriends.jpg
Where is AquaMan? --Tbeatty 00:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Could AquaMan use a keyboard without shorting it out? :-) JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 00:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. By using my special "Suck Powers(tm)" I am able to keep the water off the keyboard and stains off the blue dress. I am trying not to suck on Wikipedia but my "Suck Powers(tm)" are overwhelming. --F.a.A.f.A. 05:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
please see talk: The New Pearl Harbor — Xiutwel (talk) 12:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the pink piggy box, it looks pretty cool! :) Umeboshi 22:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A noticeboard sure is quicker than waiting for the daily shortwave numbers station broadcast from Illuminati master control. Thanks for the note, nice video. --Dual Freq 01:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bushreadingthepetgoat.jpg
|
Ahoy there, unflagging Bush-junta supporter!
|
The spamalicious graphic notification you left on my (and 25+ other) talk page[s] was in violation of WP:SPAM, specifically "promotion of ...Web sites, fandoms, ideologies, or other memes." How would you like it if I left you a similar message promoting : 911 Truth: Bush read about pet goat while America burned? Wait... I just did! :-) Good cheer, returned - F.A.A.F.A. 23:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
|
Both allegedly Jesuit-educated Wikipedians with PhDs, and know-it-all, hysterical blow-hards on the same topics, among other evidence. Check out their various contributions and the timing thereof. User:Rosenkreuz is Morton's over-the-top "I say, old chap, oh-such-an-Englishman, tea and crumpets, "S'wounds!" manifestation. --Tangerine5000 16:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Brilliant. You, who have less than 50 edits, are accusing me of being a sockpuppet? What are you afraid of that you have to hide behind a different username to make your accusation? What other username do you edit under? Heh, if you think you can build a case, go ahead and ask for a Checkuser. Filmy if you ask me, but 'fill your boots' if you must (although I have traveled in a black helicopter on occasion). The USEBACA demand it. Morton devonshire 22:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Eh? Yes, I would like to see you build a convincing case. Then we can go to checkuser, if the people there are prepared to take such tenuous accusations seriously, and you can feel embarassed after making a prat of yourself. I would like to think that if a fellow USEBACA agent and crafty Jesuit graduate was going to design an alter ego for himself, he would do better than to leave such obvious clues: but, of course, maybe that's just what They want you to think, and the placement of the categories was deliberately in order to be able to make this very excuse! Alternatively, maybe more than one person who attended a Jesuit school and subsequently received a doctoral degree edits Wikipedia, and also (probably having more than a little to do with their education) thinks that the `scholars' for `truth' are even more laughable than the Diabolicals. But why bother with prosaic, straightforward explanations when intrigue and fanciful stories can be constructed?
- Incidentally, Morton, thanks for the good cheer (the original purpose of my visit to your talk page) - and best wishes for the new year. Power to your elbows, and don't talk too much about the black helicopters: we can't have every minuteman with a homemade missile launcher trying his luck each time the traffic reporter flies above his trailer. Rosenkreuz 23:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, that PhD business is pretty funny, since in reality, you're really going for a first degree in law (and you're a pot-head). I think you are probably in Edinburgh. --Tangerine5000 17:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, perhaps you ought to look up the term `legal majority' as in `age of majority' (i.e. I was contrasting it with the child in Africa bit). Unless you were just making a bad pun. And as for me being in Edinburgh, well, Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks, you know. Rosenkreuz 18:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Tangerine5000 has been perma-blocked as a disruptive sock of Fluffbrain/Cheezwiz/XP/Rootology. Bye-yee ED-troll maggot! The Illuminated Master of USEBACA 02:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have just filed a formal complaint against BenBurch and F.A.A.F.A., alleging that they have formed a cabal or meatpuppet partnership, in violation of WP:CABAL.
ANI Complaint
I notice that you have encountered their special brand of tag-team intimidation in the past, and I encourage you to comment on your experiences at the page I have linked above, during the investigation. Thank you for your input. ArlingtonTX 20:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
|
CABAL-FREE ZONE
|
This user space is guaranteed to be 100% Cabal Free, and 'sanitized for your protection'. "Certified Grade A, 100% Cabal Free" - U.S. DIvision of Cabal Inspectors - D.H.S. Fairness And Accuracy For All 00:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
|
Just like the vegetables I buy are guaranteed to be "100% Organically Grown", my user space is now certified to be '100% Cabal Free'! I'll send the Cabal Inspection Crew around to check out yours Morty. (hint.... slip him a 20) Happy New Year! - F.A.A.F.A. 00:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bro, i appreciate your comment. From the very begging when you called me "the energizer bunny" i took you for a good guy with good intentions. And your efforts to claim some kind of justice by trying to un-delete the Islamic afd board is appreciate. But I'm a bit worn down, i have had enough of controversies and trying to go against the stream. Right now, i'm trying to save a site that is #1 Shi'a site according to both google and yahoo, google giving it a page ranks of 8, but is nevertheless deleted as non-notable... im not even upset.
We have already created Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam to have somewhere... and guess what? It' pathetic.
I'm sure you believe you are doing good by deleting articles like this, this and this... even though they fulfill all criteria for inclusion. I Guess things need to go this way, those articles need to be deleted, so that people in the future can look at them and wonder at human nature. So that is the way it is, i now understand that there is no point in trying to hold a to large burden, it's useless if the time is not right.
So, thanks for the message, i see you as a brother in humanity... and i don't care for the Muslim related afd page anymore. I'm used to be against everybody, you know, im a 1) Muslim 2) "CT" 3) 4 Shi'a 5) living in the west.
Sorry for the late answer, the whole issue seems so meaningless. Peace.--Striver - talk 14:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There are many Muslims here, and they are well-integrated -- no ghetto-enclaves in my fair city. You would be very welcome in my office, and in my home. Happy New Year to you! Morton devonshire 06:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- And you are equally welcomed to my house... if i weren't anonymous on the internet :)
- Happy New Year to you :) --Striver - talk 14:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
this: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Blocked_User:Fluffbrain. Jayjg (talk) 05:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center (3rd). TheOnlyChoice 22:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Free speech zone is currently a featured article candidate. I'm a bit worried about whether the people cited are reliable sources. Would you be able to have a look at it?
Also, there's some discussion on whether Religion of Peace should be a redirect to Little Green Footballs. Andjam 00:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Free speech zone. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Because I'm a friendly guy, and you're a friendly guy, I left you a friendly message on my friend NU's talk page. - Fairness And Accuracy For Friendly Folks 23:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Dude, I always follow you around. It's how I know where the juicy/kooky articles are : ) You won't catch me near those Creationism pieces though -- have fun with that! Your friend, The Illuminated Master of USEBACA 23:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm glad you're admitting to 'Wikistalking' me Morty, since there's no other reasonable explanation for you finding the Project Megiddo article seven minutes after I created it! Your honest admission reminds me of another great American - George Washington - and the cherry tree. Kudos Morty! Why won't you help with the Creationist Conspiracy Theories? Do you know that Answers in Genesis has 160 employees, an average donation of $70 a pop, and is spending 25 MILLION dollars building a museum to propogate the US GOV DENIED AND DISPROVEN Conspiracy Theory that the earth is 6-10,000 years old? A significant numbers of these 6-10,000 year old earth CT believers are actively working towards hastening the apocalypse, hoping to kill 1/3 (?) of mankind in an effort to bring about the second coming. See > Red Heifer Show me a 9/11 truth org with even 1/10 that kind of clout or inherent evilness. - Fairness And Accuracy For Atheists 00:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You crack me up. Keep swinging that scythe, man! The Illuminated Master of USEBACA 02:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A scythe is a scary looking tool. Ozzy would be proud... JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 03:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Morty, I see you chose not to comment on the fact that there are several Million Americans like John Hagee who are praying for, and actively working towards fomenting Armageddon. (where most believe that all Jews who don't convert will burn in hell) An uncomfortable subject ain't it? I won't bust yer balls over it. I wouldn't want to talk about it either, if I were you. ;-) - Fairness And Accuracy For All Who Don't Want to Die Just So Fundies Can Get Raptured 05:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You're learning about the religious right from the American Prospect? Do you try to learn about the DNC from Rush Limbaugh to balance it out? --Tbeatty 05:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(UI)Hi Beatty, Happy New Year. My main source of info on apocalyptic Christians are the believers themselves, through their own writings on sites like Rapture Ready, along with other Christian sites like Ministry Watch. I also rely on the claims of various Christian ministries who disagree with each other over particular end times prophecies. They don't pull any punches! I think that AP article is an accurate portrayal. If you want to continue this discussion, feel free to post on my talk page. - Fairness And Accuracy For All 06:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Morton Devonshire. NYScholar is not me, as far as I know NYScholar is always logged in, but I haven't studied the issue extensively. NYScholar is well meaning, but sort of fixed and new to Wikipedia. He's been one of the more fair editors of the article though, as it has been subject to various POV attacks from many directions. He is sort of a hard ass though, as you notice. It's best not to attack him outright in that he isn't POV pushing just being an independently minded hard ass. I've pushed to reorganize the article before in GabrielF's spirit but was rebuffed by NYScholar and others. BTW what do you think of GabrielF's suggestions? I guess you agree with him, just you want a shorter article and that is where we disagree, as you based your shortened article on my previous suggestion. --70.51.228.233 21:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The article's strangeness is due to NYScholar, the strange contents and the follow up public presentations and the non-topical ordering. But NYScholar is very conscientious and fair. Thus, I would ask that you go easy on him and base your concerns on established Wikipedia policy, as he is very partial to it -- for example, in the past I have tried to reorder the last three sections and NYScholar reverted based on Wikipedia policy, and he was right, check it yourself. I tend to mimic other people's edit summaries, if that is what got you. --70.51.228.233 21:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Funny, I just checked the edit summaries for similar and they aren't that similar, but my first today edits were to NYScholar's pages. But they were both in response to the conflict between him and you and GabrielF. I warned him of the situation, to back off and I moved some barnstars to his user page from his talk page so that both you and GabrielF realize that he is a valued contributor. I can see how this will mess with your mind given your history, it wasn't intentional, its simply that I have a dynamic IP and am somewhat protective of NYScholar. Also removed unintended comma in first comment to clarify potentially problematic meaning. --70.51.228.233 22:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I should state that I often think that NYScholar is autistic or borderline autistic. In fact, he is an individual that you can attack, he'll respond and then you can claim he is disruptive and you'll get him banned quite easily because his social awareness seemed to be reduced. --64.230.127.30 03:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not interested in getting anyone banned. He just seems to be too invested in his version of the article, and too enthralled with the importance of the book. I respect President Carter, but foreign policy has never been his strong suit. The Illuminated Master of USEBACA 04:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]