Mister-jones (talk | contribs) ←Blanked the page |
RV talk page, it would be appreciated if you instead of deleting the comments archived them. It is for example relevant that you have been 3RR-warned if you should do it again. |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Video journalism]]== |
|||
You are continuing to make [[WP:NPOV|POV]] edits to the [[Video journalism]] article. Biased edits like that violate the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]] principle. [[User:CloudNine|CloudNine]] 16:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:If you read the page carefully, I did not make the "colourful" comment. That was made by another user. [[User:CloudNine|CloudNine]] 16:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
==The Three Revert Rule== |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola_apps_important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[WP:EW|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Video journalism|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Video journalism]]}}. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please read [[WP:3RR]]. {{{2|}}}<!-- {{uw-3rr}} --> [[User:CloudNine|CloudNine]] 08:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Editing [[Video journalism]] == |
|||
I have noticed your revert war over at the video journalism article, involving this account as well as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/216.80.64.206 an IP address], and I see that you've been informed about the 3 revert rule. I have a very direct message for you: |
|||
If you edit that article again before explaining yourself on [[Talk:Video journalism]], or if you edit [[User:Mackan]]'s user page again, or if you make any unconstructive edit, whether logged in or not, I will block your account and your IP address to prevent further disruption until you agree to participate in constructive dialogue. I can see that you have a problem with some of the content in that article, so make your case on the article's talk page, and if you convince me, I'll remove the offending material myself. |
|||
Simply doing the same thing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Video_journalism&diff=prev&oldid=106349546 over] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Video_journalism&diff=prev&oldid=106576111 and] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Video_journalism&diff=prev&oldid=107251442 over] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Video_journalism&diff=prev&oldid=106502543 again] is not only disruptive, but seems to indicate that you think ramming your head repeatedly into the same wall is a productive or smart way to get anything done. Here's a clue: it isn't, ''and'' it's not tolerated at Wikipedia. Thank you for understanding, and I look forward to seeing your contributions to a substantive ''dialogue''. You know the [[WP:POL|rules]]; let's play ball. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 22:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:30, 28 March 2007
You are continuing to make POV edits to the Video journalism article. Biased edits like that violate the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view principle. CloudNine 16:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- If you read the page carefully, I did not make the "colourful" comment. That was made by another user. CloudNine 16:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
The Three Revert Rule
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Video journalism. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:3RR. CloudNine 08:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Editing Video journalism
I have noticed your revert war over at the video journalism article, involving this account as well as an IP address, and I see that you've been informed about the 3 revert rule. I have a very direct message for you:
If you edit that article again before explaining yourself on Talk:Video journalism, or if you edit User:Mackan's user page again, or if you make any unconstructive edit, whether logged in or not, I will block your account and your IP address to prevent further disruption until you agree to participate in constructive dialogue. I can see that you have a problem with some of the content in that article, so make your case on the article's talk page, and if you convince me, I'll remove the offending material myself.
Simply doing the same thing over and over again is not only disruptive, but seems to indicate that you think ramming your head repeatedly into the same wall is a productive or smart way to get anything done. Here's a clue: it isn't, and it's not tolerated at Wikipedia. Thank you for understanding, and I look forward to seeing your contributions to a substantive dialogue. You know the rules; let's play ball. -GTBacchus(talk) 22:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)