→User talk:Sandstein#ANI discussion: new section |
WP:ARBPIA arbitration enforcement warning |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Your comment is requested there urgently. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 22:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC) |
Your comment is requested there urgently. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 22:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] The [[WP:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has permitted [[WP:Administrators|administrators]] to impose, at their own discretion, [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|sanctions]] on any editor working on pages broadly related to {{#switch:a-i |
|||
|a-i=the [[Arab-Israeli conflict]] |
|||
|a-a=[[Armenia]]-[[Azerbaijan]] and related ethnic conflicts |
|||
|b=the [[Balkans]] |
|||
|h=[[Homeopathy]] |
|||
|9/11=the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]] |
|||
|e-e=Eastern Europe |
|||
|fg=[[Falun Gong]] |
|||
|#default={{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Uw-sanctions|'''See below for options'''|<strong class="error">Error: No topic specified</strong>}} |
|||
}} if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], any expected [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|standards of behavior]], or any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. If you {{#if:|continue with the behavior on [[:]]|engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area}}, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{#switch:a-i |
|||
|a-i=Palestine-Israel articles |
|||
|a-a=Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 |
|||
|b=Macedonia |
|||
|h=Homeopathy |
|||
|9/11=September 11 conspiracy theories |
|||
|fg=Falun Gong |
|||
}}#Final decision]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> |
|||
<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<font style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Sandstein '''</font>]]</span></small> 00:01, 23 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:01, 23 February 2010
Talk page
You are not welcome to post at my talk page. Don't do it again. Jehochman Brrr 19:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- You are welcome to post at my talk page at any time.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. Look, I am irritated. If somebody appears to irritated, it is best to let them be. Jehochman Brrr 19:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with you, and please accept my sincere apology for my last message to your talk page. When I posted this to your talk page, I really thought that I found a person, who could understand how somebody feels, when he has no power even over his/her own talk pages. It actually was a cry for help, and I was sadden by your reaction. Of course it is a poor justification for my own reaction, and once again I am sorry.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. You don't need to apologize. I didn't need to threaten to block those other two; they deserved it, but it would have been better to ask them nicely to stop, and point out their actions were indistinguishable from trolling, even if that was not their intention. Jehochman Brrr 19:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Jonathan. When I posted my first message to your talk page, my main point was to thank you for helping a user, who needed your help most at the moment. It did not even matter, if a user was right or wrong. it could have been decided later. What mattered was that he needed some immediate help, and you were there for him. I really wish I had somebody as you in my corner, when I desperately needed some understanding, and some kind words. I actually started discussion on the subject of deleting own talk pages here, but so far there was not much interest.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. You don't need to apologize. I didn't need to threaten to block those other two; they deserved it, but it would have been better to ask them nicely to stop, and point out their actions were indistinguishable from trolling, even if that was not their intention. Jehochman Brrr 19:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with you, and please accept my sincere apology for my last message to your talk page. When I posted this to your talk page, I really thought that I found a person, who could understand how somebody feels, when he has no power even over his/her own talk pages. It actually was a cry for help, and I was sadden by your reaction. Of course it is a poor justification for my own reaction, and once again I am sorry.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. Look, I am irritated. If somebody appears to irritated, it is best to let them be. Jehochman Brrr 19:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- You are welcome to post at my talk page at any time.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
Re:Thank you
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your comment is requested there urgently. Thanks, Sandstein 22:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision. Sandstein 00:01, 23 February 2010 (UTC)