Timotheus Canens (talk | contribs) →Block reset: new section |
DarknessShines2 (talk | contribs) →Sockpuppetry case: thanks raven |
||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
: If there's anything you'd like for me to copy to the page, please post it here and I'm sure someone will be glad to copy it over. <b><font color="darkred">[[User:Ravensfire|Ravensfire]]</font></b> <font color="black">([[User talk:Ravensfire|talk]])</font> 14:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC) |
: If there's anything you'd like for me to copy to the page, please post it here and I'm sure someone will be glad to copy it over. <b><font color="darkred">[[User:Ravensfire|Ravensfire]]</font></b> <font color="black">([[User talk:Ravensfire|talk]])</font> 14:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks Raven, i suspect someone is trying to get me even further blocked, i wonder whom it might be? So my defence. This diff from TFD [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Communist_terrorism&action=historysubmit&diff=393276274&oldid=393259410] he says the same book is here on my talk page, no shite so it is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marknutley&action=historysubmit&diff=393278874&oldid=393278265] please note the timestamps. Now is it all so surprising that i would copy that over as it looks like a good source? The 9/11 thing, very very compelling evidence, for anyone who has lived on the moon, in a cave, with a sack over their head for the last few years and never heard of 9/11. I can see how shocking that someone else may would consider that particular date americas worst terrorist attack. What else? Tripe, well that`s bollocks, who the hell says tripe. This is another bullshit try by the four dunces to try and get me banned, it`s what he does. [[User:Marknutley|mark ]] ([[User talk:Marknutley#top|talk]]) 15:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Block reset == |
== Block reset == |
Revision as of 15:01, 28 October 2010
Index
|
||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
October 2010
Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
Appeal
The only way to appeal this is via e-mail? Well that sucks, the block would have expired before it got sorted. So much for blocks being preventative not punitive, the usual pile of bollocks, typical. mark (talk) 13:36, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- hang in there man, [several] others agree may agree the block was an error. Darkstar1st (talk) 15:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Request
Hi Mark, sorry to see you blocked again, you really do need to stay away from those arbitration articles', while you are blocked I have a small job I would like looking at, are you interested, I can mail you the details if you are, shouldn't take more than a two or three hours going through some contributions and making a report as to the edit patterns? Off2riorob (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sure mate fire away, i am home most of tomorrow mark (talk) 22:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Mark, bit late but there is no real rush, better a decent look and a detailed report. I have mailed you. Off2riorob (talk) 16:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Request
Could someone be so kind as to revert this sock please [1] mark (talk) 20:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
- Done VernoWhitney (talk) 20:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Stuff for Communist terrorism
Comrades!: a history of world communism By Robert Service Terrorism versus democracy: the liberal state response [1] [2]
- ^ Schwab, Gail M.; Jeanneney, John R. (30 June 1995). The French Revolution of 1789 and its impact. Greenwood Press. p. 293. ISBN 978-0313293399.
- ^ Andrew Silke (24 August 2004). Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failures. Routledge. p. 206. ISBN 978-0714653112.
This is formal notification because you are one of the affected parties. --TS 00:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Off2riorob
With respect to this comment, you may have missed the context that the precipitating action was an edit war involving Off2riorob's repeated insertion of dodgy material at William Connolley, for which he has now received a very strong warning under the climate change discretionary sanctions.[2] [3].
To fully observe your "Remedy 3" topic ban it would be wise to step away immediately. I will remove your comment. --TS 12:48, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- You will do no such thing. I am commenting on a proposed sanction on an editor. I am not commenting on a CC article at all, thank you mark (talk) 12:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
This is your formal notification [4]. --TS 13:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Are you taking the piss? You file an enforcement request against me instead of just asking for clarification? Words fail me. mark (talk) 13:10, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- I want you to understand that I don't think there's any question about this. You've broken your topic ban. You disagree with this, you clearly have every intention of continuing as at present, so the only thing to do is take it uninvolved admins, and that means filing a case at WP:AE. They've specifically asked editors not to make freeform entries there. --TS 13:24, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Right-wing terrorism
You are being discussed at the ANI noticeboard.[5] TFD (talk) 20:40, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
Notice to administrators: In a 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
<Appeal moved to AN> NW (Talk) 18:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
(outdent) Sorry, mate. Don't see why there wasn't a way for the arbs to just clarify to you that you were half an inch over the line of your topic ban (and therefore give you a chance to stop on your own and not do it again). This whole thing is going bonkers; I think I'm about to de-watchlist the whole set of CC articles except for the few in areas that touch my professional work. I don't know enough to do consistent quality work in the others, this area's long since stopped being fun or interesting, and I think we're all getting a little too annoyed with the whole thing. Awickert (talk) 02:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Tell me about it, it`s not like i was doing it purposfully either, this block is shite enforced by the same mark (talk) 19:57, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Can somebody tell me if i can be unblocked to work in my userspace only? It is a pain trying to create an article in word :O( mark (talk) 22:52, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Was curious, so I googled. This OpenOffice extension (see also this description) seems to let you edit in OpenOffice (which is a lot like Word) and then upload to WP or another MediaWiki project. Here's an article about it that says it's pretty good.
- Option B of course is to spend time doing a less-stressful hobby, which is coming towards the front of my table of options... though I enjoy the crowd at the geology articles so much that I don't think I'll ever give WP up entirely :) Awickert (talk) 00:44, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marknutley for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. TFD (talk) 02:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- If there's anything you'd like for me to copy to the page, please post it here and I'm sure someone will be glad to copy it over. Ravensfire (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Raven, i suspect someone is trying to get me even further blocked, i wonder whom it might be? So my defence. This diff from TFD [7] he says the same book is here on my talk page, no shite so it is [8] please note the timestamps. Now is it all so surprising that i would copy that over as it looks like a good source? The 9/11 thing, very very compelling evidence, for anyone who has lived on the moon, in a cave, with a sack over their head for the last few years and never heard of 9/11. I can see how shocking that someone else may would consider that particular date americas worst terrorist attack. What else? Tripe, well that`s bollocks, who the hell says tripe. This is another bullshit try by the four dunces to try and get me banned, it`s what he does. mark (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Block reset
For evading your block as 81.94.201.92 (talk), your block has been reset. T. Canens (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2010 (UTC)