No edit summary |
|||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
::{{ping|Mar4d}} Yes, I have tried to present a chronological, yet neutral version in the lede. [[User:2Joules|2Joules]] ([[User talk:2Joules|talk]]) 12:55, 20 May 2018 (UTC) |
::{{ping|Mar4d}} Yes, I have tried to present a chronological, yet neutral version in the lede. [[User:2Joules|2Joules]] ([[User talk:2Joules|talk]]) 12:55, 20 May 2018 (UTC) |
||
:::{{ping|Mar4d}} Let's discuss on the articles talk page. [[User:2Joules|2Joules]] ([[User talk:2Joules|talk]]) 13:04, 20 May 2018 (UTC) |
:::{{ping|Mar4d}} Let's discuss on the articles talk page. [[User:2Joules|2Joules]] ([[User talk:2Joules|talk]]) 13:04, 20 May 2018 (UTC) |
||
==Clarification and Amendment== |
|||
See [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_India-Pakistan]] regarding the ARE decision that affected you. — [[User:MapSGV|MapSGV]] ([[User talk:MapSGV|talk]]) 20:18, 23 May 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:18, 23 May 2018
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Your recent reverts on Rajput clans
Dear, You made an edit on the said article and modified the sourced contents. Have you gone through the given sources before making an attempt to edit. Just do it and also refer the talk page of the said article where I have given a line from from the source. For your easy reference I have mentioned the related page no. too. Thanks.--MahenSingha (Talk)
Yo
Yo man could you please go over to the Al-khalid tank and talk page and clear up all the confusion there.
help required
sir reference to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fakhar_Abbas
i am contacting you to help to revive this article please note the person has done a lot in different fields but he is quite media shy and don't want to be named for his achievements regarding the complaints about references here are few articles within Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22fakhar-i-abbas%22&title=Special:Search&go=Go&searchToken=5wg4hahw6m7r2haav0bu1r6yi
https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Fakhar_Abbas.html
and also here are https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMGLg1Ja_Qw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFIrA7TULxA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLfhCosAPbw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smS2r_WYQRU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WuyUnJX0QU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spklHufXs5Y
https://www.google.com.pk/search?q=fakhar+abbas+bioresource+research+centre&oq=fakhar+abbas+bioresource+research+centre&aqs=chrome..69i57.11151j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
i can provide more if required please help restoring this page or let me know what else they require
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Cricket and Ghulam Mustafa Khan
Ghulam Mustafa Khan died at age 93 in 2005 at Hyderabad, Sindh. Just finished editing his article and thought of asking you to take a peek at it since you are a cricket fan. His career was mainly as a scholar and linguist with Sufi tendencies. To my surprise, he did meticulous work to preserve the history of cricket in Pakistan starting in the 1950s. Truly an amazing Pakistani with such varied interests!!! Developed a lot of respect for the 'departed soul' as I was editing his article. May ALLAH bless him. Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:11, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Ngrewal1: Thank you for your contributions, the article is in a much better shape since your expansion. Please keep up the good work. Cheers, Mar4d (talk) 07:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
1RR violation
This is a violation of the 1RR restrictions imposed on that article. Here's your chance to self revert. MBlaze Lightning talk 15:12, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Will you explain how this is a revert; it involved an addition of text, not removal/modification of the disputed text. Mar4d (talk) 15:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- It's a revert since you've restored the 44 figure once again, go read the policy yourself but don't expect me to spoonfeed it to you. MBlaze Lightning talk 15:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
WikiCup 2018 May newsletter
The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:
- Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
- Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
- Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
- SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
- Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
- Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
- Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs
So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You are indefinitely banned from all edits and pages related to conflict between India and Pakistan, broadly construed. You are warned that any further disruption or testing of the edges of the ban will be met with either an indefinite topic ban from all topics related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan or an indefinite block, without further warning.
You have been sanctioned per this AE discussion.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please go to WP:TBAN and read the information there to see what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal against the imposition of the ban, see WP:AC/DS#sanctions.appeals which explains the ways in which you may appeal. Additionally, you may ask for this sanction to be removed at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard after six months of positive contributions to Wikipedia. GoldenRing (talk) 08:17, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- @GoldenRing: This is disappointing and unfortunate at the same time. That ARE makes for a long and confusing reading, and certainly is hard to follow. As it stands, I've been busy IRL - my lack of participation evident enough for the lack of defense. However, I do have quite a bit to say and will reserve it for later, if time constraints permit me. Thanks, Mar4d (talk) 15:06, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Afia
I am going to work to take this to Featured or Good level status. I was wondering if "background" section is appropriate, or if it should be removed, as the information is covered elsewhere in the text. 2Joules (talk) 12:19, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- @2Joules: The background section seems to have more to do with the case, as opposed to Biography which is more around her personal life. I would leave it as it is, but if there is anything to be merged/moved between these two sections, that can be done. As far as the WP:LEAD is concerned, I would advise maintaining a sequence in the order of the various views concerning her. This is a controversial topic, so it should be tread and fine-turned with WP:NPOV. Mar4d (talk) 12:53, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Clarification and Amendment
See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_India-Pakistan regarding the ARE decision that affected you. — MapSGV (talk) 20:18, 23 May 2018 (UTC)