Welcome! As far as I could notice, nobody gave you any rules or welcomes
|
June 2014
![Stop icon with clock](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/39/Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola_with_clock.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — MusikAnimal talk 21:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, why have I been blocked I let you know so something could be done I haven't even edited again since it was the other editor that did. Lukejordan02 (talk) 21:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Lukejordan02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Like I said above I haven't done anything I informed animal that retrohead had reverted the page even though he told us not to and the next minute I am blocked. Lukejordan02 (talk) 21:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per below, it would seem you made sure it wasn't the wrong version that would be protected if he chose to do that? We hate that. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- My rationale... you and the other concerned editor were given proper warning. Instead of using the article's talk page as instructed you both continued to revert each others changes. A preventive measure became necessary. In my opinion, when the block expires, it may be best to stay away from this article altogether for a good while. If you would like to continue to discuss the matter in a civil manner, again, use the talk page. It's clear you two are at odds, reverting the page to your desired state accomplishes nothing. — MusikAnimal talk 21:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate that but like I said I never made any changes or reverted anyone I listened to what you said and only when he reverted I re-reverted before informing you of what was going on. Lukejordan02 (talk) 22:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Retrohead (talk) 21:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at UFC Fight Night: Henderson vs. Khabilov. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. --Retrohead (talk) 21:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)