HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs) |
ChildofMidnight (talk | contribs) →Just so we're clear: wikify |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
Oh, yeah. Sorry for dumping that lot on the Atheism project, but I found them listed under an Anti-Christian category so we took them on there as well. With any luck, no one will have to do actually do much with those articles for a while. I hope so anyway. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC) |
Oh, yeah. Sorry for dumping that lot on the Atheism project, but I found them listed under an Anti-Christian category so we took them on there as well. With any luck, no one will have to do actually do much with those articles for a while. I hope so anyway. [[User:John Carter|John Carter]] ([[User talk:John Carter|talk]]) 19:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Just so we're clear== |
|||
Regarding: "Simple copyedits they may have been, but you need not do them." |
|||
I understood this to mean, although they were simple copyedits, I didn't need to make them (ie. they weren't necessary). Given your response to my correction, I think you may have meant to say: I need to avoid making them (ie need to NOT do them)? I'm sorry I misunderstood. The grammar is off in that sentence and I was confused. Sorry my effort to fix it didn't work out and I'm sorry for the confusion. |
|||
As far as correcting [[typo]]s, I hesitate to name names but there are numerous editors (including admins) who appreciate these corrections being made. I'm just one of the rogue editors who tries to help out. This is a [[wiki]] after all and we're meant to [[collaborate]]. So showing common [[courtesy]] and [[decency]] towards one another is a [[good thing]]. Assuming [[good faith]] is also a key [[guideline]]. No need to leave further messages on my page thanks, I've had quite enough from you and your [[gang]] of [[bobblehead]]s. Thank you very much. Cheers. [[User:ChildofMidnight|ChildofMidnight]] ([[User talk:ChildofMidnight|talk]]) 04:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:28, 17 April 2009
eh...ahem......how about this? I made this myself! (That is, the goods and the picture.) Now how's about that vote? Drmies (talk) 03:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Barney Frank articleIn case you are not aware, the editing on Barney Frank (which you just protected) and Talk:Barney Frank is the subject of a current AN/I report. Thanks, Wikidemon (talk) 03:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Interested in Religion and LGTB issues?Hey. If your answer is yea, check this out: Homosexuality#Religion. Somebody needs to improve that section (references and stuff). Phoenix of9 (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC) Re: Speedy on Kings of Chaos (online game)Was there any reason in particular that you declined the speedy on Kings of Chaos (online game)? I personally feel that it applied under A7 as web content, but maybe there was something I hadn't considered? I'm not trying to be a jerk here, just wondering if I'm not understanding the requirements. Wyatt Riot (talk) 03:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Spring onionsMrs. Shallot, I came by for the purpose of noting that I've been quite pleased to see your good works around Wikipedia recently and to note that my little corner of the project has been brightened by your presence. I've enjoyed your collaborations and insights, and I do hope our interactions will continue. Your userpage looks quite familiar to me. Is that a common image on Wikipedia? Have I seen you around before? Anyway, I hope you enjoy the most pleasant of editing wherever your watchlist takes you. Let me know if my handiwork is ever of some use to you and by all means feel free to weigh in any time on the projects where I am involved. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello- I am not exactly sure how this works but I am the content submitter for Quiet Monkey Fight (User: Megapixel). Can you please explain the notability flag for that article? What are you exactly looking for? We see many comparable theatrical groups posted with article pages. It's a legitimate group with notability. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Megapixel (talk • contribs) 17:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ladyofshalott, Thanks for your reply. We do not have any reviews from major local newspapers- Our following is a younger crowd and notability comes from being invited to perform around the country at reputable festivals and doing regular shows for three years. Do you have any other examples (other than reviews) that would help with vouching for Wikipedia's definition of notability? Thanks. comment added by Megapixel
Thanks for your reply. We were covered by The Weekly Dosage in a video interview (http://www.truveo.com/The-Weekly-Dosage-Ep-1-Quiet-Monkey-Fight-and-The/id/4035076790) and in an online article with Seattle Sketchfest (http://sketchfest.blogspot.com/2006/11/getting-to-know-your-sketch-neighbors.html). Other than that, numerous event listings in major Seattle newspapers for the city calendar of recommended comedy shows. Thanks again. Megapixel Dublin Pride
"Blatent advertising" Martin-09-DP (talk) 13:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC) Hi. Im working on an entry for the site but it seems that you deleted it. Could give me a detailed explaination for that. The information I put up was pretty basic. Nothing controversial. Im really at a loss as to why it was deleted especially since I based the information on identical information and approach from the London pride page. I would apprecaiate a speedy response on this.
Martin.--Martin-09-DP (talk) 14:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC) CanvassingIt wasn't canvassing. Already responded to your comment at WP:ANI. -- Scjessey (talk) 04:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Easter, Southern styleThanks, APK! Happy Easter to you! LadyofShalott Weave 22:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Notability of Ascot J SmithHello - just wondering - you declined speedy on this article, stating that notability was asserted with awards. However no mention of awards was provided on the page. Google has zero search results for full name quoted [1] and only 20 results (mostly subjects own pages) for http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=kWB&num=50&q=%22Ascot+J.+Smith%22&btnG=Search. Is the subject notable? JCutter (talk) 01:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
WeirdI was attempting to make an apology to an editor with whom I think I was a bit strident on my first encounter, and I was redirected here. Anyway, I think I was a bit overly defensive (ie. aggressive) in my initial encounters with an editor who may or may not have been you. I hoped that future encounters demonstrated that I wasn't such a bad person after all, but it's best to take accountability and not leave things in doubt. So I just wanted to note that I'm sorry if I was a bit bitey at first. If I am not remembering accurately, and I can't frankly remember the details or the context (like what article was involved, or was it a userpage?), then just disregard. Where I come from we sometimes yell a lot. But that's just because we don't know any better and it shouldn't be taken personally. :) Sorry about that. I'm going to be double careful not to let it happen again, even if you sometimes make a mistake in failing to agree with me on every occasion. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
May I respectfully ask Your Ladyship why she decided to decline the request for speedy deletion of the above article? I believe it was seconded by at least one other editor. However, I do not wish to give the impression that the decision was, necessarily, the wrong one, nor that it is my desire to see a salvageable article deleted, though it did, at least at the time it was nominated, appear to be of little content and that content that was there appeared to be nothing but advertising for the business, with no context provided as to why the subject was notable. I have contacted the author, though he doesn't seem to have taken heed of any of the messages left for him regarding the speedy, with suggestions for overhaul of the article, though, I must, respectfully, say that there seems very little notable in the article, as much as I hate to say so about the work of a fellow editor. If m'Lady would reply on my talk page, it would be greatly appreciated. Warm regards, HJ Mitchell (talk) 22:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
When proddingJust a friendly reminder to use an edit summary when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! Hiding T 11:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
<comment copied from above section LadyofShalott Weave 18:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)> Is the poem describing the "curse" of falling in love with a knight in shining armor (armour)? Is there a connection to lesbianism? I'm not seeing any. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you're a member of the LGBT-team. Could you possibly yourself or with others help solve the current disputes in homosexual transsexual. It leads to quite a lot of wikistress for the editors involved, while they try but hardly make progress. Some inside opinion might help. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 16:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC) SometimesOh, yeah. Sorry for dumping that lot on the Atheism project, but I found them listed under an Anti-Christian category so we took them on there as well. With any luck, no one will have to do actually do much with those articles for a while. I hope so anyway. John Carter (talk) 19:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Just so we're clearRegarding: "Simple copyedits they may have been, but you need not do them." I understood this to mean, although they were simple copyedits, I didn't need to make them (ie. they weren't necessary). Given your response to my correction, I think you may have meant to say: I need to avoid making them (ie need to NOT do them)? I'm sorry I misunderstood. The grammar is off in that sentence and I was confused. Sorry my effort to fix it didn't work out and I'm sorry for the confusion. As far as correcting typos, I hesitate to name names but there are numerous editors (including admins) who appreciate these corrections being made. I'm just one of the rogue editors who tries to help out. This is a wiki after all and we're meant to collaborate. So showing common courtesy and decency towards one another is a good thing. Assuming good faith is also a key guideline. No need to leave further messages on my page thanks, I've had quite enough from you and your gang of bobbleheads. Thank you very much. Cheers. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC) |