Content deleted Content added
→Jose de Paula: new section |
Epeefleche (talk | contribs) →Technically ...: new section |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
With [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jos%C3%A9_de_Paula&diff=668495491&oldid=668488470 this edit], you put text in front of a source that didn't support the addition. Please make sure to put text after, preferably with its [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jos%C3%A9_de_Paula&type=revision&diff=668503860&oldid=668502414 own proper source]. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 18:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |
With [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jos%C3%A9_de_Paula&diff=668495491&oldid=668488470 this edit], you put text in front of a source that didn't support the addition. Please make sure to put text after, preferably with its [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jos%C3%A9_de_Paula&type=revision&diff=668503860&oldid=668502414 own proper source]. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 18:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Technically ... == |
|||
Being DFA's does not mean your tenure with the team has ended. You are off the 40 man roster. But one of the DFA options is that you are -- within 10 days -- returned to the roster. It is after your DFA option shows you not to be in the organization that it is proper to indicate in the time-span (year x to year y) something other than present at the end. Best. --[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 23:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:25, 2 July 2015
Jose de Paula
With this edit, you put text in front of a source that didn't support the addition. Please make sure to put text after, preferably with its own proper source. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:43, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Technically ...
Being DFA's does not mean your tenure with the team has ended. You are off the 40 man roster. But one of the DFA options is that you are -- within 10 days -- returned to the roster. It is after your DFA option shows you not to be in the organization that it is proper to indicate in the time-span (year x to year y) something other than present at the end. Best. --Epeefleche (talk) 23:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)