No edit summary |
→Mathsci: new section |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The indefinite block on this account has been presented to the [[WP:AC|Arbitration Committee]] for consideration, as a response to an appeal from Jagz. The decision of the ArbCom should be made relatively soon. [[User:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] [[user talk:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">✉</font>]] 21:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
The indefinite block on this account has been presented to the [[WP:AC|Arbitration Committee]] for consideration, as a response to an appeal from Jagz. The decision of the ArbCom should be made relatively soon. [[User:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">'''Anthøny'''</font>]] [[user talk:AGK|<font color="#2A8B31">✉</font>]] 21:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Mathsci == |
|||
It's hard to believe that [[User:Mathsci]], as a repeated violator of [[WP:Harass]], keeps getting bailed out of trouble by a few allied Wikipedia administrators. --[[User:Jagz|Jagz]] ([[User talk:Jagz#top|talk]]) 17:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:28, 21 October 2008
Jagz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I would like this account to be unblocked so I can resume editing with my new account User:Fat Cigar. I am not interested in editing with the Jagz account anymore. I believe that my indefinite block on June 13 was unjustified. I was unblocked on June 16. I apologize for the comments I made on June 30 in response to a threat of reinstating the indefinite block by the administrator who blocked my account on June 13. These comments led to the indefinite block being reinstated on June 30. I also apologize for the comments I made on June 30 after the block. Also, I stated that I did not want to be unblocked on June 30. --Jagz (talk) 06:17, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to edit with another account, you should request the unblock of that other account, not this one. — Sandstein 10:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Jagz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
User:Sandstein stated in my previous request, "If you want to edit with another account, you should request the unblock of that other account, not this one." Actually, I must request that the block of this account be lifted first since the other account was blocked as a result of this account being blocked. --Jagz (talk) 14:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Decline reason:
it looks like that account is causing some of the same problems that caused this account to be blocked. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Jagz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am making one final request before appealing to the arbitration committee but would prefer not to do that. --Jagz (talk) 05:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are welcome to appeal to whomever you feel appropriate, but you lack of response to MastCell's concerns below makes me extremely uncomfortable about unblocking you. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 06:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Public note
The indefinite block on this account has been presented to the Arbitration Committee for consideration, as a response to an appeal from Jagz. The decision of the ArbCom should be made relatively soon. Anthøny ✉ 21:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Mathsci
It's hard to believe that User:Mathsci, as a repeated violator of WP:Harass, keeps getting bailed out of trouble by a few allied Wikipedia administrators. --Jagz (talk) 17:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC)