Jack Sebastian (talk | contribs) →Please stop adding sensationalized and contradictory comments: er, that was supposed to go away... |
→Fuck it, ban away you little bitch: new section |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
And, for the record, I fully accept that Lara Lor-Van was the character's ''[[maiden name]]'' (similar to Martha Clark being the birth name of Ma Kent). As such, it has a place in the article's introductory paragraphs, but not the infobox. [[User:Ace Class Shadow|Ace Class Shadow]]; [[User talk:Ace Class Shadow|My talk]]. 19:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC) |
And, for the record, I fully accept that Lara Lor-Van was the character's ''[[maiden name]]'' (similar to Martha Clark being the birth name of Ma Kent). As such, it has a place in the article's introductory paragraphs, but not the infobox. [[User:Ace Class Shadow|Ace Class Shadow]]; [[User talk:Ace Class Shadow|My talk]]. 19:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Fuck it, ban away you little bitch == |
|||
I thought about it and remembered that I only ever started contributing as a hobby for the fun of it. But if wikipedia is going to let an obnoxious little weasel like you continue to get away with your crap and piss people off (as anyone who bothered to look at your track record would see is the case), then it is much more entertaining for me to simply disrespect you in the most straight forward, blunt manner possible. All you've really caused is for me to lose respect for wikipedia itself. |
|||
So, Fuck you you passive-aggressive, inconsistent, hypocritical, infantile boy. Have fun with your hallway monitoring video game and fuck off. [[User:Yinzland|Yinzland]] ([[User talk:Yinzland|talk]]) 06:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:31, 3 January 2011
IP talkpages
Your question at ANI was a good one. If an IP is stable then you will get the message. If your IP switches about then you will not. As this user made edits from the same IP on two different days [1] it looks likely that it does not change. As a test I just tried leaving a message for myself on my own IP talkpage and when I logged out I was informed I had a new message on that page (don't worry my IP and personal identitiy are well known to certain members of the community including arbcom :)). 194.66.0.122 (talk) 10:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC) Polargeo 2 (talk) 10:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Your comments regarding me
Jack, I'm going to request that you please not carry out any more conversations like User talk:Polargeo 2/Archives/2010/November#Re: IP talkpages, wherein you make statements about me such as " "I don't think the user is a puppetmaster or anything; I just think he should have owned up to the IP usage" and "I thought that denying an IP that you did use is pretty dishonest". You appear to be presenting me to others as someone who has socked, when I have not done any such thing. I'm not asking you to stop discussing checkuser policy or anything; that's all perfectly fine. I would simply like for you to not continue to make statements insinuating that I have committed any wrongdoing (or giving your opinion on the good- or bad-faith quality of my doings). Thank you. keɪɑtɪk flʌfi (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
- With respect, I did not present you as a sock. Read the post again, Fluffy - I was seeking input on how to pursue RfCU in the future, as I had apparently handled the one regarding you so poorly that your claim that you weren't the IP in question was even challenged. More to the point, I did not name you when I asked for guidance; unfortunately, you have chosen to identify yourself. I did not call you - and am fairly certain that you are not - a sockmaster. I took special pains to keep your name from the discussion so as to make the question about how I should have pursued the action better, and nothing else. You should feel free to point out where I named you. Frankly, I think you just forgot to log in and were less than candid about that when asked twice. If it is bad faith to file an investigation I suspect socking, then there's a lot of bad faith occurring every time someone files a RfCU.
- Moreover, it begs the question: why - after at least a month or two since we've had any contact whatsoever - are you stalking my edits? Shortly after the RfCU was declined, I removed you from my watchlist, and promptly forgot about you (though not the unusual action at CU). Please stop stalking my edits. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 20:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Re:
Uhh... because she is super hot and I wasn't thinking because i was pissed off because my brother broke my Call of Duty. A Word Of Advice From A Beast: Don't Be Silly, Wrap Your Willy! 21:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beastly21 (talk • contribs)
Yes, I would like to discuss it - The Cultural Phenomena of Santa Tracking !!!
Read
Thanks for replying to santa discussion, my read my reply. thanksTheFutureGood (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Please dont touch my recent edit to santa claus again
If you were that worried about avoiding mentioning specifics in numbers you would have removed the bit that said 'and eight or nine'. But as you left that it is wrong for you to say that you removed my edit inorder to avoid specific numbers, as specific numbers were still there, they just weren't explained. Don't undo it again if you have a problem you're welcome to discuss it in the discussion section of santa claus. Or here if you want. Merry Christmas :)TheFutureGood (talk) 09:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- That's not the way it works here in Wikipedia. If you don;t want people touching your edits, don;t make them. That's the point of collaborative editing. If we don't have specific numbers (or cannot cite them), we do not use them. Period. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 15:46, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
YOu cannot say 'If we don't have specific numbers', as WE ARE USING SPECIFIC NUMBERS WHEN THE ARTICLR SAYS '8 OR 9'. If this is your excuse for removing my edit, I will not accept it until you take out '8 or 9'. Now as you keep on changing the article I suggest, while you think I may be edit warring, you realise that SO ARE YOU. You are continously undoing peoples edits without good reason. I have clearly proved in my above sentence that your excuse does not add up!TheFutureGood (talk) 22:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
My edits in Batman in film
I'm sorry my edits didn't follow guidelines. However, I believed it was a completely true statement, considering I used Wikipedia itself as my source. The only female villains for Batman, unless Nolan invents a new one, are in fact: Poison Ivy, Catwoman, Lady Clay, and, now doing a little more research, possibly The Question (by plot variation). Now I know... I cannot make inferences on Wikipedia using Wikipedia as a source. I apologize. --The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 06:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Young Justice (TV series)
Can you explain why you removed this paragraph from the article? All of the information in it is referenced.-5- (talk) 13:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Lara-El?
Uh, Jack, am I missing something? As far as I can tell, there's no "back-n-forth" as you call it. There's barely anything on the talk page, and the only recent edits in the history are non-controversial fixes, updates, and additions. No war. Not much activity at all, really. Anyway, I was just removing names that clearly are not "alternate identities" per the WikiProject Comics guidelines.
In other words, it doesn't matter whether "Lara Lor-Van" or "Lara-El" are accepted names for the character. (Though, properly, the latter isn't.) They're not alternate identities (like Batman's "Matches Malone" or Superman's "Nova" and "Nightwing".) Thus, they don't belong in that spot.
And, for the record, I fully accept that Lara Lor-Van was the character's maiden name (similar to Martha Clark being the birth name of Ma Kent). As such, it has a place in the article's introductory paragraphs, but not the infobox. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 19:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Fuck it, ban away you little bitch
I thought about it and remembered that I only ever started contributing as a hobby for the fun of it. But if wikipedia is going to let an obnoxious little weasel like you continue to get away with your crap and piss people off (as anyone who bothered to look at your track record would see is the case), then it is much more entertaining for me to simply disrespect you in the most straight forward, blunt manner possible. All you've really caused is for me to lose respect for wikipedia itself. So, Fuck you you passive-aggressive, inconsistent, hypocritical, infantile boy. Have fun with your hallway monitoring video game and fuck off. Yinzland (talk) 06:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)