Undid revision 413403958 by V7-sport (talk) have a look at your talk page |
No edit summary |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
:Good job. I am not sure how to further improve it. There aren't many sources. [[User:Iqinn|IQinn]] ([[User talk:Iqinn#top|talk]]) |
:Good job. I am not sure how to further improve it. There aren't many sources. [[User:Iqinn|IQinn]] ([[User talk:Iqinn#top|talk]]) |
||
== July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike == |
|||
Re your latest reversion of [[July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike]].The sources do not state what you are saying they state, There was no mention of mistaken identification in the sources, the words that I used were direct quotes. Please revert your latest edit. Thanks so much. [[User:V7-sport|V7-sport]] ([[User talk:V7-sport|talk]]) 01:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
You didn't address the problem, what you are posting is not backed up by the information in the article. I'll take care of it myself, please do post information that is not in the references, thanks. [[User:V7-sport|V7-sport]] ([[User talk:V7-sport|talk]]) 01:34, 12 February 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:34, 12 February 2011
Mahmudiyah
Do you have any reliable sources speaking of a cover up? It seems the easiest way to cover it up would be to not charge the soldiers and keep everything hush, but if you have good sources then it should be added. Otherwise all I can find is several sources citing a birth cirtificate that was never produced, versus several sources estimating her age; I'm not sure unless there is clear evidence that one is right and the other is wrong that we can pick one and leave out the others...? Fuzbaby (talk) 04:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- I just evaluated hundreds of sources again and with no doubt Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi (August 19, 1991 - March 12, 2006) was 14 when she was gang-raped and murdered. [[1]], [[2]], [[3]], [[4]], [[5]], [[6]], [[7]], [[8]], [[9]], [[10]], [[11]], [[12]], [[13]], [[14]], [[15]], [[16]], [[17]], [[18]], [[19]], [[20]]... Do you have any reliable source from 2009, 2008, 2007 that shows she was not 14? The wrongly claims she was older then 14 originates mainly from the early testimonies of the convicted rapists and murders. For example Steven Green guilty on all 17 counts and you can read the 17 counts here. Have a close look at the counts and you will probably understand what i mean with cover up. You can also find more information here, here and here. Do you still think we should not write she was 14 and instead repeat the false statements of the rapists and murders? Iqinn (talk) 08:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Recent Edit
Hi - I have a question as to why you removed the tag from the article on Nayif Fahd Mutliq Al Usaymi. I originally placed it there because the sources listed there are primary sources - in other words, there are no secondary sources that do more than trivially mention the subject of the article. The reason you listed as removing the tag seems to be the exact reason I placed the tag there in the first place? Thanks for clearing this up! BWH76 (talk) 09:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- I was a bit surprised because i can not remember that i have remove tags from this page. I usually do not remove tags that other people have placed. So i checked the history of the page. It could be that has removed them if you mean these removed tags. IQinn (talk) 10:33, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- I just had another closer look at the article. I fully agree with you on the tag and have added the same tags to other articles with the same problem. User:Sherurcij has added the {ARB} template in the same edit. What automatically adds automatically one more ref to the article. But this ref is also a primary source and the subject of the article is not mention in it this article. IQinn (talk) 10:58, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Animal Number 64
Could you please explain why you created a redirect under Animal Number 64 that pointed to Lahcen Ikassrien?
Animal Number 64 has no incoming links. And 64 is not even Lahcen Ikassrien's ISN.
I thought you were concerned that the Guantanamo captives shouldn't be dehumanized? Please explain how calling a captive an animal is consistent with your stand on dehumanization. Geo Swan (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- There are various methods how to dehumanize an individual, letting a prisoner wear a plastic bracelet that calls him "Animal number 64" get's an A+ on how to dehumanize an individual. But that is what happen to Lahcen Ikassrien when he was detained. Headline in secondary sources. And here are the links where you can find who dehumanized him. [21], [22]. IQinn (talk) 23:32, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
- There are still no incoming link to Animal Number 64. I anticipate other contributors are likely to either ask you to explain this redirect. Less patient and understanding contributors than I am may just nominate it for speedy deletion. This is less likely to happen if there are incoming links. Geo Swan (talk) 01:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Uighur location
It's not all that important, but just for your own edification, you should know the Uighurs do not live in southern China, as you said in this edit. In fact, assuming that we can agree that "southern" China is the area below, say 30°N, and given that that area is almost 100% east of the Mekong, we find that the Uighurs, who live in the northwestern region of the People's Republic's territory, are actually located as far away across the country as possible from "southern" China. 74.178.230.17 (talk) 02:29, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- My bad - you are of course absolutely right. I have corrected my comment there, i hope it is fine now. Thank's for telling me. IQinn (talk) 02:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
- No problema. 74.178.230.17 (talk) 06:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Because you've been involved in cleaning up Geo Swan's userspace, you may be interested in a discussion about a possible RfC/U at User talk:Cunard#Myriads of MFDs .... Cunard (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for your support at my RfA last week. I'll do everything I can to live up to your expectations and if you ever need help from a janitor please feel free to drop me a line! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Notice
File:Narang night raid.jpg has been nominated for deletion review. Swarm X 13:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- I am looking at this page for the first time in a couple of weeks. If I had been aware of Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 November 11#File:Narang night raid.jpg, and hadn't been overwhelming busy with the very large flood of {{mfd}} I would have endorsed your upload of this file. I would have endorsed keeping the image at DRV. I don't always disagree with you. And I would not let your challenges to my character, my judgment, my motives, influence me to side with your challengers, when I think policy favors your position. Geo Swan (talk) 16:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Re: Could you please explain
Deletion debates are very often closed before the full 7 days, as can be seen by looking at the number of blue boxes currently on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2010_December_12. Based on an analysis of the arguments, the consensus indicated a keep. LFaraone 04:20, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps it should have been closed as no-consensus, since the debate was close, but the end result would have been a keep either way. The rationale given by DGG is sound, IMHO. If you disagree with that, there's always WP:DR, but I don't think that's warranted. LFaraone 04:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Feel free to take the article to WP:DRV, but I expect them to affirm the result. LFaraone 15:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- "As for the primary source, of course official government sources contribute to notability. The previous debates have been whether inclusion of them alone is enough to show notability, and I think the conclusions was it depends upon the authoritative nature of the source and what it says.", and that there are "two other sources for him totally independent of that". LFaraone 16:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Feel free to take the article to WP:DRV, but I expect them to affirm the result. LFaraone 15:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Can you comment on this article?
Iqinn: I made changes to Abdul Hafiz (Guantanamo detainee) based on the tags, removed the content fork, neutralized the article, etc. Can you make any other suggestions regarding this article? Thanks.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 22:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike
Re your latest reversion of July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike.The sources do not state what you are saying they state, There was no mention of mistaken identification in the sources, the words that I used were direct quotes. Please revert your latest edit. Thanks so much. V7-sport (talk) 01:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
You didn't address the problem, what you are posting is not backed up by the information in the article. I'll take care of it myself, please do post information that is not in the references, thanks. V7-sport (talk) 01:34, 12 February 2011 (UTC)