Anachronist (talk | contribs) →NPA: reply |
Ibn kathir (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:It is linked in my first line above. Your edit speaks for itself and requires no explanation. On Wikipedia, commenting negatively on others constitutes a personal attack. In particular, calling people "myopic" and speculating on their personal background constitutes a personal attack. ~[[User:Amatulic|Amatulić]] <small>([[User talk:Amatulic#top|talk]])</small> 23:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC) |
:It is linked in my first line above. Your edit speaks for itself and requires no explanation. On Wikipedia, commenting negatively on others constitutes a personal attack. In particular, calling people "myopic" and speculating on their personal background constitutes a personal attack. ~[[User:Amatulic|Amatulić]] <small>([[User talk:Amatulic#top|talk]])</small> 23:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
Myopic is not a "swear word" it simply means shortsightedness and was in line with his opening remark which i took offense at, "Most intelligent rational people WILL assume that a 9 year old is immature." clearly implying i am neither of these while emphasising the word "Will" this by definition is shortsightedness since he clearly has no knowledge of history. Secondly speculating on someones background is not an insult and that is joke if you think it is, well unless you seem to think being a christian is insulting, he clearly divulged his religious background when he said he would be busy with Christmas so i was not speculating on anything nor did i comment or imply that being christian is negative so their wasn't even an implied insult. |
|||
this entire matter is a joke if your holding me to these standards while i have seen far worse remarks elsewhere and nothing is done by any moderator/admin or whoever waves the stick around here. |
|||
[[User:Ibn kathir|Ibn kathir]] ([[User talk:Ibn kathir#top|talk]]) 08:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:06, 20 December 2010
For reporting some one Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. (Ewpfpod (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC))
See Wikipedia:Citing sources on how to cite sources. (Ewpfpod (talk) 15:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC))
Stop
You need to stop personalizing our discussions, right now. I am profoundly offended that you would speculate on and comment about my religious beliefs, or rather, what you imagine my beliefs might be. First, you are completely and totally wrong and your suggestions about what my beliefs might be are insulting. Second, such comments are completely inappropriate and do nothing to further the discussion or improve the article. Your behavior so far has been nothing but disruptive and it is no longer easy, or even possible, to assume good faith in your editing. Doc Tropics 20:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
You earlier made the statement that you where busy for the next month or so with Christmas what other assumption should i make from that?
Ibn kathir (talk) 18:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
NPA
Concerning edit of yours:
This is your only warning. If you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Talk:Criticism of Muhammad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
you'll have to explain that one because i dont see the personnel attack anywhere?
Ibn kathir (talk) 18:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- It is linked in my first line above. Your edit speaks for itself and requires no explanation. On Wikipedia, commenting negatively on others constitutes a personal attack. In particular, calling people "myopic" and speculating on their personal background constitutes a personal attack. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Myopic is not a "swear word" it simply means shortsightedness and was in line with his opening remark which i took offense at, "Most intelligent rational people WILL assume that a 9 year old is immature." clearly implying i am neither of these while emphasising the word "Will" this by definition is shortsightedness since he clearly has no knowledge of history. Secondly speculating on someones background is not an insult and that is joke if you think it is, well unless you seem to think being a christian is insulting, he clearly divulged his religious background when he said he would be busy with Christmas so i was not speculating on anything nor did i comment or imply that being christian is negative so their wasn't even an implied insult.
this entire matter is a joke if your holding me to these standards while i have seen far worse remarks elsewhere and nothing is done by any moderator/admin or whoever waves the stick around here.
Ibn kathir (talk) 08:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)