Undid revision 368714873 by DeltaQuad (talk): wasn't vandalism, though there are other problems |
68.41.55.171 (talk) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Of course you are voting for Greene, you are a Democrat== |
==Of course you are voting for Greene, you are a Democrat== |
||
Like all the others trying to VANDALIZE my prima facie obvious, totally sourced edit. OTOH, I am NOT voting for Greene, which makes me REALLY non-partisan.[[Special:Contributions/68.41.55.171|68.41.55.171]] ([[User talk:68.41.55.171|talk]]) 02:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
Like all the others trying to VANDALIZE my prima facie obvious, totally sourced edit. OTOH, I am NOT voting for Greene, which makes me REALLY non-partisan.[[Special:Contributions/68.41.55.171|68.41.55.171]] ([[User talk:68.41.55.171|talk]]) 02:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
Socialist? That's even worse! And sorry, but your mind-numbing hair-splitting argument doesn't work on me. If it was just a matter of changing it from plural to singular, why not do that? Instead you DELETED the whole thing. That makes it IMPOSSIBLE to assume good faith and IMPOSSIBLE not to detect an unambiguous bias. Thanks for making it so obvious...[[Special:Contributions/68.41.55.171|68.41.55.171]] ([[User talk:68.41.55.171|talk]]) 04:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:11, 24 June 2010
Cleaning up the page again, everything is in the history. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:46, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
New stuff goes at the bottom, people. Also, please sign your posts in talk pages with four tildes (~~~~).
Of course you are voting for Greene, you are a Democrat
Like all the others trying to VANDALIZE my prima facie obvious, totally sourced edit. OTOH, I am NOT voting for Greene, which makes me REALLY non-partisan.68.41.55.171 (talk) 02:18, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Socialist? That's even worse! And sorry, but your mind-numbing hair-splitting argument doesn't work on me. If it was just a matter of changing it from plural to singular, why not do that? Instead you DELETED the whole thing. That makes it IMPOSSIBLE to assume good faith and IMPOSSIBLE not to detect an unambiguous bias. Thanks for making it so obvious...68.41.55.171 (talk) 04:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)