Hammersoft (talk | contribs) |
FootballHK (talk | contribs) →About James Ha: new section |
||
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
Please do not restore this image to that article again. The use of non-free images without a specific rationale for that use is not supported. This is required by [[WP:NFCC]] #10c policy. I've re-removed the image from that article. If you have questions, ask. Thanks, --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 13:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
Please do not restore this image to that article again. The use of non-free images without a specific rationale for that use is not supported. This is required by [[WP:NFCC]] #10c policy. I've re-removed the image from that article. If you have questions, ask. Thanks, --[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 13:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
== About [[James Ha]] == |
|||
You have reverted the article ([[James Ha]]) for 4 times, for writing the school James Ha studied. You are reminded that you have violated the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|3RR rules]].--[[User:FootballHK|FootballHK]] ([[User talk:FootballHK|talk]]) 06:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:04, 8 February 2011
Bung Karno Stadium
WP:FLAGCRUFT didn't tell us cannot use flag icon in succession box about sports venue.Hoising (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Correct, it doesn't *specifically* say one cannot use "flag icon's in succession box". There are many other things it doesn't say. But it *does* say one cannot use flags for purely *decorative* purposes. Please explain why you need to have a flag? --Merbabu (talk) 11:40, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Custom only, all Asian Cup Final Venue use flag icon. Hoising (talk) 11:45, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- You say "custom *only*". Well, custom is not a valid reason because the custom can be wrong. Tradition "only" is a bad reason. If it is a good tradition then keep it, but if it is a bad tradition, remove it. So, since you say this is the "only" reason, the issue is now resolved. thanks --Merbabu (talk) 11:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- You create your custom... And you have no valid reason. Anyway, can you change all pages to your right ? Don't be rude, please. Hoising (talk) 11:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC
- 3 questions: What custom did I create? Where did I say "your right"? Specifically, how I am rude? --Merbabu (talk) 11:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't want to debate with you. Can you change all Asian Cup Final Venue pages to one mode? Hoising (talk) 11:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- No, i don't want to debate you either - i just want you to stick to wikipedia policy, unless you a good reason to make an exception (which you haven't provided). No, i will not go through and change other articles. As I said, wikipedia doesn't work on "custom" or consistency, and I have no obligation to do so. Now that I have made you aware of the policy, perhaps you could remove the flags to make the Asian Cup Final thing comply. thanks in advance. --Merbabu (talk) 12:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)-
- I don't want to debate with you. Can you change all Asian Cup Final Venue pages to one mode? Hoising (talk) 11:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- 3 questions: What custom did I create? Where did I say "your right"? Specifically, how I am rude? --Merbabu (talk) 11:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- You create your custom... And you have no valid reason. Anyway, can you change all pages to your right ? Don't be rude, please. Hoising (talk) 11:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC
- You say "custom *only*". Well, custom is not a valid reason because the custom can be wrong. Tradition "only" is a bad reason. If it is a good tradition then keep it, but if it is a bad tradition, remove it. So, since you say this is the "only" reason, the issue is now resolved. thanks --Merbabu (talk) 11:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Custom only, all Asian Cup Final Venue use flag icon. Hoising (talk) 11:45, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I check the reason, add the flag because the succession box did not show the countries. (show the city only, we cannot understand the host country) The flag is not decorative objects! Hoising (talk) 01:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- then the sucession box is at fault. The country name should be written instead. No need for flags. --Merbabu (talk) 01:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFC_Asian_Cup - is a classic case of what WP:NOT - in normal circumstances the overuse of small flags at the AFC cup article would be normally seriously challenged SatuSuro 01:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- It not overuse because of the unit of the host. Contrary of your idea, wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.Hoising (talk) 02:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have written the country names instead. We can't assume everyone recognizes countries' flags. Better use words. Problem solved. Cheers. --Merbabu (talk) 02:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Please drop it now - you have reverted - made your point - and shown your english - you are into dangerous territory if you try telling other editors what to do with your level of english - cheers SatuSuro 02:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- It not overuse because of the unit of the host. Contrary of your idea, wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.Hoising (talk) 02:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Well done! You've done a good job in this article. =]--Antonytse (talk) 15:31, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Joe Hart
Hello. Not sure why you keep removing the {{England U21 Squad Euro 2009}} template from Joe Hart. He was a member of that squad, as shown at 2009 UEFA European Under-21 Football Championship squads and in the UEFA match reports, e.g. the semifinal, where he scored in the penalty shootout. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- When a player changes club, we replace the previous club squad template with that of the new club, but squads for national team competitions are treated differently. If a player is in the squad for a national team competition, whether it's at under-21 or senior level, then that squad template is kept as a historical record. As at James Milner, who was also in the 2009 under-21 squad and the current WC squad, or at Pelé, who was in 4 World Cup squads, all 4 of which are correctly included in his page. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, maybe you don't understand what I'm saying. We don't remove international competition squad templates from player articles. It doesn't matter if the template is for the 2009 UEFA European Under-21 Football Championship or the 2006 FIFA World Cup or the 2010 Africa Cup of Nations. If the player was in the squad, then they keep the template. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Can you classify that 2009 UEFA European Under-21 Football Championship, 2006 FIFA World Cup or and 2010 Africa Cup of Nations to youth or senior tournaments? I laugh at your sense; you understand that the rule but you cant not control yourself to choose the right. Hoising (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
"Van" vs "van"
If you read this page, you will see that when Giovanni van Bronckhorst is referred to without his first name, he is referred to as "Van Bronckhorst", not "van Bronckhorst". Van Bommel, De Zeeuw and Van der Vaart are also referred to with capitalised names. – PeeJay 15:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sky Sports also does the same, as do The Guardian and The Telegraph. – PeeJay 15:12, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- I am so sorry about that since he is a Dutchman. So, we must follow the Dutch name rule, like van der Waal, and Stefan Kießling (not Stefan Kiessling) in Germany.Hoising (talk) 15:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- It not the case. The name must be follow the original rule. Do you remember Côte d'Ivoire should not be named Ivory Coast? Hoising (talk) 15:21, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Okay... one global website - Yahoo! Netherlands v Japan, Fixtures and Results Hoising (talk) 15:33, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- ??? missed point ??? Capitalized in Netherlands v Japan since the auto-capitalize function for the paragraph. For the lineup, the writer understand how to handle the preposition. The point of what I was saying is written name should be follow the original rule of each country. Hoising (talk) 15:48, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Again, you obviously don't understand. In the line-up, the surnames are preceded by the initial of the player's first name, hence why it is not capitalised. Get a clue. – PeeJay 15:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Just
I discover you have a great problem. It is not easy to say, such as, you believe the news from skysports (company) and unbelieve the news(differ) from FIFA (government). It is very laughable. Hoising (talk) 16:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? FIFA.com also capitalises the surnames when written without a first name. See here. – PeeJay 16:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Dong Fangzhuo
Hi, I read that article about Chinese naming practices, but I saw nothing in there that said we have to refer to Dong by his full name. He was the only player by that name in the China squad for the Olympics, so his surname should suffice. After all, this is the English Wikipedia and we should do things the same way the English-language media do. By the way, here is an example of only Dong's surname being put on his shirt. – PeeJay 08:39, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Anyway, you just see the shirt names of Chinese, Koreans and Hongkonger in FIFA. Or read the templates of chinese clubs or koreans clubs. If you are in China or Korea, no body will call other people by surname. Are you lived in these country?? Hoising (talk) 08:46, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- I lived in Singapore for 7 years, that's close enough. Anyway, I can tell this conversation is going to be futile, since you're obviously going to be as obdurate about this as you were with the Dutch names issue. – PeeJay 08:54, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Singapore ... LOL. Look at Singapore national football team, most people take his surname for shirt name since there are not chinese characters! Look at the templates:
- I lived in Singapore for 7 years, that's close enough. Anyway, I can tell this conversation is going to be futile, since you're obviously going to be as obdurate about this as you were with the Dutch names issue. – PeeJay 08:54, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
this is the only method to identify Chinese people. Hoising (talk) 09:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- But Dong DOES NOT NEED IDENTIFYING. He is the only one with that name in the squad, so there is NO NEED to put his given name. – PeeJay 09:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- In this Olympic match in 7 August 2008, You can see the Z. for Zhuo in Dong Fangzhuo. Please respect all Chinese people. Don't take this as a joke. Hoising (talk) 09:31, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- In my experience it is fairly common practice to use the full name in the context of teams or large groups of people with Chinese or Korean names. For this player at this tournament there might be no ambiguity, but for most instances there will be ambiguity for at least some members of the team, and thus the standard has developed. I'd err on the side of including the full name - it doesn't look particularly unusual or out of place to me. Knepflerle (talk) 12:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Hong Kong templates
Hi there.
Nice for you to update the template. I don't think you realised the colours already used by all the templates. Some of the template colours should be reflected by its topic. For example the {{HKIA}} template should follow the {{Demographics and culture of Hong Kong}} templates. e.g. green colour theme for the tourism and culture templates. Same with the {{Shopping centres in Hong Kong}}. You changed them all to purple without consensus.
The purple colour theme is used for the government and political templates only. You can check all the templates here: Category:Hong Kong Government templates. And all templates here Category:Hong Kong templates.
Anyway, I'm not going to revert, it will be silly to argue about colour themes as ugly and inconsistent it may look. I just want to let you know the colour scheme for all the templates are out of sync. Takamaxa (talk) 12:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hi HS, sorry for the late reply. Thanks for replying and your response. My intention was let you know about the colours that existed before you and I edited, thats all. But do feel free to continue with changes as I know (WP:AGF) you want them to be consistent as well. Who knows, these new colours you put on there make one get used to it as well. have a good one. Takamaxa (talk) 11:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Shanghai
你唔可以將上海同廣東比。上海戰前係一個唔係完全由中國人統治嘅地方,同香港嘅情況相似。上海亦擁有自己嘅足球聯賽,甚至比香港更早成立。--FootballHK (talk) 10:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
按照你的意思,也應把澳門那場刪去吧?我們不應把現在的情況應用於1913年或1939年。--FootballHK (talk) 11:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
上海西聯會是聯合國部隊;上海足球總會則最終收編為中國足協的地方總會;兩者定位如何可想而知。至於香港全華班(冇洋將嘅老虎隊)更曾在1915年的第二屆遠東運動會前與上海隊爭奪代表中國的資格,可見上海隊不能與香港的代表隊劃一而計。澳門跟香港情況相同,還是香港跟上海的情況相同,不應偷換概念。另外,為了這問題,我查了資料,滬港盃的香港是港聯隊,不是香港隊。相反,港澳埠際賽除了1937年4月18日及1938年5月8日兩場香港由乙組球員的聯隊出戰外,1939年起一直都以香港隊的名義出賽。hoising (talk) 14:49, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- 收編為地方總會和這個問題沒關係吧,香港足球總會當時也是現英格蘭足總的地方總會。其餘事項稍後再研究,要上學了。--FootballHK (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Please do not restore this image to that article again. The use of non-free images without a specific rationale for that use is not supported. This is required by WP:NFCC #10c policy. I've re-removed the image from that article. If you have questions, ask. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 13:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
About James Ha
You have reverted the article (James Ha) for 4 times, for writing the school James Ha studied. You are reminded that you have violated the 3RR rules.--FootballHK (talk) 06:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)