Dayewalker (talk | contribs) →Forum Shopping: new section |
Greenbay1313 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
This is advice for you, and whoever you work with, and whatever your next identity will be on Wikipedia. If you disagree with something on a page, '''go to that article's talk page and calmly discuss it.''' What you're doing is disruptive, and all it's accomplishing is making it harder for editors to actually go through those articles and determine what needs to stay and what needs to go. Those articles shouldn't be puff pieces, neither should they only contain negative material. Voice your concerns on the talk page with sources, and let the Wikipedia editors hear you, rather than having to defend articles and noticeboards from blatant attempts to edit war and disrupt. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 17:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC) |
This is advice for you, and whoever you work with, and whatever your next identity will be on Wikipedia. If you disagree with something on a page, '''go to that article's talk page and calmly discuss it.''' What you're doing is disruptive, and all it's accomplishing is making it harder for editors to actually go through those articles and determine what needs to stay and what needs to go. Those articles shouldn't be puff pieces, neither should they only contain negative material. Voice your concerns on the talk page with sources, and let the Wikipedia editors hear you, rather than having to defend articles and noticeboards from blatant attempts to edit war and disrupt. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 17:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
Appreciate your commentary. Not seeking puff pieces simply balance I ask that you review the posted sources and previous editions. --[[User:Greenbay1313|Greenbay1313]] ([[User talk:Greenbay1313#top|talk]]) 17:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:59, 31 March 2011
Welcome
|
Forum Shopping
As you are obviously here to discuss the 5WPR and Torossian pages, I'd advise you to go to the talk pages of the article and discuss there. You are not allowed to post your same comments on more than one message board, it's called forum shopping, and is disruptive.
This is advice for you, and whoever you work with, and whatever your next identity will be on Wikipedia. If you disagree with something on a page, go to that article's talk page and calmly discuss it. What you're doing is disruptive, and all it's accomplishing is making it harder for editors to actually go through those articles and determine what needs to stay and what needs to go. Those articles shouldn't be puff pieces, neither should they only contain negative material. Voice your concerns on the talk page with sources, and let the Wikipedia editors hear you, rather than having to defend articles and noticeboards from blatant attempts to edit war and disrupt. Dayewalker (talk) 17:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Appreciate your commentary. Not seeking puff pieces simply balance I ask that you review the posted sources and previous editions. --Greenbay1313 (talk) 17:59, 31 March 2011 (UTC)