RightCowLeftCoast (talk | contribs) →Response to EW claim: new section |
RightCowLeftCoast (talk | contribs) →Response to EW claim: extention |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
Please see what I had done. I am not referring to AP as liberal, I have provided references to liberal commentators, and named them as such. Why is it that conservative commentators are so labeled, but liberal commentators are not. It can be said that others are edit warring as well, and to say that I am is not assuming [[WP:AGF|good faith]].--[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 19:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC) |
Please see what I had done. I am not referring to AP as liberal, I have provided references to liberal commentators, and named them as such. Why is it that conservative commentators are so labeled, but liberal commentators are not. It can be said that others are edit warring as well, and to say that I am is not assuming [[WP:AGF|good faith]].--[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 19:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Additionally it appears that other users have reverted 3 times ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=You_didn%27t_build_that&diff=510806942&oldid=510802264 1], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=You_didn%27t_build_that&diff=510793205&oldid=5107929492 2], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=You_didn%27t_build_that&diff=510792949&oldid=510792425 3]. Please be careful.--[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 21:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:14, 4 September 2012
Archives: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Archive 4 Archive 5
|
Mediation Request Re: Adi Da page
A request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Mediation case name has been filed with the Mediation Committee (MedCom). You have been named as a party in this request. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Mediation case name and then indicate in the "Party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate in the mediation or not.
Mediation is a process where a group of editors in disagreement over matters of article content are guided through discussing the issues of the dispute (and towards developing a resolution) by an uninvolved editor experienced with handling disputes (the mediator). The process is voluntary and is designed for parties who disagree in good faith and who share a common desire to resolve their differences. Further information on the MedCom is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee; the policy the Committee will work by whilst handling your dispute is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy; further information on Wikipedia's policy on resolving disagreements is at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes.
If you would be willing to participate in the mediation of this dispute but wish for its scope to be adjusted then you may propose on the case talk page amendments or additions to the list of issues to be mediated. Any queries or concerns that you have may be directed to an active mediator of the Committee or by e-mailing the MedCom's private mailing list (click here for details).
Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission.
Queen WikiProject
Hello, I've seen you around editing some of Queen's articles. Would you consider becoming a member of Queen WikiProject, a collaborative effort which works to improve the coverage of Queen related articles on Wikipedia? If you're interested, join us! |
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Wikipedians interested in Integral or Transpersonal theory
Category:Wikipedians interested in Integral or Transpersonal theory, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk)
Disambiguation link notification for August 21
Hi. When you recently edited Buddy Guy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Killing Floor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi
You may be interested in the Reincarnation research merge proposal, and you are welome to contribute there if you wish. Johnfos (talk) 01:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
For your information
Hi Goethean. I noticed today some similarities between <1> and <2>. After I saw this and this, I thought you should be informed. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 14:31, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- Shall I do the honors? — goethean ॐ 00:49, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Up to you... :) After reading some of the stuff, I figure you'd know better than anyone else, but it sure looks like DUCK to me... AzureCitizen (talk) 00:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Response to EW claim
Please see what I had done. I am not referring to AP as liberal, I have provided references to liberal commentators, and named them as such. Why is it that conservative commentators are so labeled, but liberal commentators are not. It can be said that others are edit warring as well, and to say that I am is not assuming good faith.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Additionally it appears that other users have reverted 3 times (1, 2, 3. Please be careful.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)