Brihaspati (talk | contribs) General note: Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sources on Weeping Jesus statue in Mumbai. (TW) |
→October 2019: Your DYK sucks |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]]. We appreciate [[Special:Contributions/Elizium23|your contributions]], but in one of your recent edits to [[:Weeping Jesus statue in Mumbai]], it appears that you have added [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]], which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say]]. Please be prepared to cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the [[Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing_sources#VisualEditor|tutorial on citing sources]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-nor1 --> <b> [[User:Harshil169|<i style="color:orange; font-family:Brush Script MT">Harshil </i>]]</b><sup>[[User Talk:Harshil169|want to talk?]]</sup> 00:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]]. We appreciate [[Special:Contributions/Elizium23|your contributions]], but in one of your recent edits to [[:Weeping Jesus statue in Mumbai]], it appears that you have added [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]], which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say]]. Please be prepared to cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the [[Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing_sources#VisualEditor|tutorial on citing sources]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-nor1 --> <b> [[User:Harshil169|<i style="color:orange; font-family:Brush Script MT">Harshil </i>]]</b><sup>[[User Talk:Harshil169|want to talk?]]</sup> 00:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
||
::Get over it, your DYK sucks. [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23#top|talk]]) 00:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:47, 28 October 2019
Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
- Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- To initiate a new conversation on this page, please .
- You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).
|
|||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
2019 US Banknote Contest
US Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
Is the Vatican's website not a reliable enough source?
I'm not sure what kind of inherit bias you have towards the Church of the East but the declaration clearly states the theological position of the Church of the East. Unfortunately due to your rash judgement and inability to decipher the information contained in the source document you've labelled it unreliable. You need a serious reassessment of your actions and need to at least take the time to understand the information contained in the source document before labelling it as unreliable. I'm reversing the change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramsin93 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Update: I added a secondary source affirming the notion that the Assyrian Church of the East is inappropriately labeled Nestorian. Maybe take time to read and learn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramsin93 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Weeping Jesus statue in Mumbai, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.-- Harshil want to talk? 03:18, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Harshil want to talk? 03:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Weeping Jesus statue in Mumbai, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Harshil want to talk? 00:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)