→A few leftover Consensus Required sanctions: new section |
Doug Weller (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
*[[Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement]] |
*[[Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement]] |
||
If you want to make a change but are too busy to fiddle with the templates I can do it on your behalf with your permission. <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~[[User:Awilley|Awilley]] <small>([[User talk:Awilley|talk]])</small></span> 03:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC) |
If you want to make a change but are too busy to fiddle with the templates I can do it on your behalf with your permission. <span style="font-family:times; text-shadow: 0 0 .2em #7af">~[[User:Awilley|Awilley]] <small>([[User talk:Awilley|talk]])</small></span> 03:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC) |
||
:{{re|Awilley}} please do, but please don't add BRD. I really don't lie it, perhaps because when editing fringe articles it just doesn't work, ditto sometimes BLPs. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 18:56, 14 June 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:56, 14 June 2019
The current date and time is 5 June 2024 T 22:55 UTC. You can email me from this link but in the interests of Wiki-transparency, please message me on this page unless there are pressing reasons to do otherwise. Comments which I find to be uncivil, full of vulgarities, flame baiting, or that are excessively rude may be deleted without response. If I choose not to answer, that's my right; don't keep putting it back. I'll just delete and get annoyed at you.
Site Map |
Edits |
Email | ||||
Welcome to my talk page! I am an administrator here on Wikipedia. That means I am here to help. It does not mean that I have any special status or something, it just means that I get to push a few extra buttons to help maintain this encyclopedia. If you need help with something, feel free to ask. Click to start a new topic.
|
First, please remember that I am not trying to attack you, demean you, or hurt you in any way. I am only trying to protect the integrity of this project. If I did something wrong, , but remember that I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please keep your comments civil. If you vandalize this page or swear at me, you will not only decrease the likelihood of a response, your edits could get you blocked. (see WP:NPA) When posting, do not assume I know which article you are talking about. If you leave a message saying "Why did you revert me?", I will not know what you mean. If you want a response consisting of something other than "What are you talking about", please include links and, if possible, diffs in your message. At the very least, mention the name of the article or user you are concerned with. If you are blocked from editing, you cannot post here, but your talk page is most likely open for you to edit. To request a review of your block, add Administrators: If you see me do something that you think is wrong, I will not consider it wheel-warring if you undo my actions. I would, however, appreciate it if you let me know what I did wrong, so that I can avoid doing it in the future. |
User talk:103.93.201.2
My Dear Sir, i am praying you the God of the Deo Sun Temple article Write and update articles because I do not know much English. So please update on Wikipedia Deo Sun Temple By updating article by yourself, which will make us very happy. please i am personally requesting you please it is my really really Best sun temple and famous temple in world.
Thanks
Thank you for the notification and the feedback of my contributions. Nathan Annick (talk) 19:13, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).
- Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický
- An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
- An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
- An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.
- The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
- Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.
- The previously discussed unblocking of IP addresses indefinitely-blocked before 2009 was approved and has taken place.
- The 2019 talk pages consultation produced a report for Phase 1 and has entered Phase 2.
Copyright Claim
Hello editor you tagged me for copyright violation - very sorry about that, I certainly had no intentions of violating anything - before I was able to look at it, however, the note was gone. Im curious what it is I did wrong so that I may not do it again. Everything I write I write myself, I don't plagiariase anything, so I'm thinking it must have been a photo? I uploaded a photo of a company under the assumption that educational use for purposes like this is permitted, but I can understand if thst is the issue. Let me know. Canlawtictoc (talk) 18:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
CU
Since the block on Taskcubed [1], the user returned as Laidspine [2]. Editing the same articles and exact edit his other sock made [3] [4] He is also editing 1982 Ethiopian–Somali Border War which is his favorite article, his sock activity goes back to atleast april of 2018 on that article [5] 105.107.13.84 (talk) 22:49, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Too far back for CU but I agree, so blocked. Doug Weller talk 17:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Political references
Hi, Doug, I'd like some advice on the latest addition to Between Scylla and Charibdis. I suspect the insertion is offtopic and only there to score political points; I'm sure too that there's a guideline somewhere about such behaviour. It was invoked to delete references during the Trump campaign, I seem to remember. Can you jog my memory, or even go to the page and invoke it. That at least would point towards a consensus on the matter. Thanks, Sweetpool50 (talk) 00:10, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Heironymous Rowe has now stepped in with the required guideline. Thanks if you tipped him off. Sweetpool50 (talk) 13:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- {Not unless he saw it here. Sorry I didn't remember to respond. Doug Weller talk 17:38, 10 June 2019 (UTC) @Sweetpool50: Doug Weller talk 17:41, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks
Hi, as a relatively new user who encountered you here, I just wanted to say that I think you've struck an excellent tone over at the current mess, and I've found your comments very helpful to understand both sides of the situation. Thank you, GreyGreenWhy (talk) 20:09, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- It's very kind of you to say that. Doug Weller talk 20:17, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
Assuming good faith
Hello Doug. I am not assuming anything. I am asking an editor at whom his comments are directed, as they seem like strawman arguments, which are not conducive to productive discussion. Somewhat ironically I am objecting to his assumptions about his imaginary opponents. The ball is with him to explain who he is addressing, scholar or editor. Best. Essentially Dave (talk) 14:48, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Essentially Dave: yes, you are not assuming anything, but we expect editors to assuem good faith. Particularly if you are a new editor discussing something with someone who probably knows a lot more about our policies and guidelines than you do. Doug Weller talk 15:07, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, another one of the disgustingly bigoted Mikemikev's socks. Thanks for letting me know. Doug Weller talk 15:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
You originally blocked this user on the basis of 'not being here to build an encyclopedia' then unblocked. I've had to make a whole much of reverts and respond (as have other editors) to obscure and esoterica talk page requests. It is possible that I'm being unfair - is there any chance you would be prepared to take a look? -----Snowded TALK 10:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Snowded you seem a bit protective of philosophy article updates in these changing modern times...good luck and thanksArnlodg (talk) 15:41, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
A few leftover Consensus Required sanctions
Hi Doug, you may remember my December 2018 proposal to replace the "Consensus Required" sanction with the BRD sanction. [6] The proposal ended up being mostly moot because of the change in rules that you proposed to ArbCom, and I took it upon myself to remove the CR sanction from all the articles that User:Coffee had added it to, replacing the sanction at most of those articles with the BRD sanction. The WP:AN thread itself went to archive without a close, though I don't think there would have been a strong enough consensus to override discretionary sanctions placed by multiple admins. Anyway I've come across 5 articles that still have a Consensus Required sanction placed by you, and I was wondering if you would be open to modifying or removing that sanction. The articles are:
- David Malpass
- Executive Order 13768
- Myron Ebell
- National Policy Institute
- Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement
If you want to make a change but are too busy to fiddle with the templates I can do it on your behalf with your permission. ~Awilley (talk) 03:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Awilley: please do, but please don't add BRD. I really don't lie it, perhaps because when editing fringe articles it just doesn't work, ditto sometimes BLPs. Doug Weller talk 18:56, 14 June 2019 (UTC)