→January 2021: new section |
→January 2021: AE block |
||
Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -[[User talk:Fastily|<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:120%;">F</span><span style="font-size:90%;">ASTILY</span></span>]] 10:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC) |
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> -[[User talk:Fastily|<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';color:Indigo;font-weight:bold;"><span style="font-size:120%;">F</span><span style="font-size:90%;">ASTILY</span></span>]] 10:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
==Ae block== |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Balance icon.svg|40px|left|alt=]]To enforce an [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|arbitration]] decision and for persistent [[WP:DE|disruptive editing]] to the [[WP:ARBHORN]] topic area (also noting that any further violations may lead to additional sanctions, including but not limited to a [[WP:TBAN|topic ban]], which may yet be imposed, regardless of anything), you have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] (specifically [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Arbitration enforcement blocks|this section]]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard]]. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' ~~~~}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me ([[Special:EmailUser/El C|by email]]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. </p> <div class="sysop-show"><hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Standard provision: appeals and modifications|procedure instructing administrators]] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> [[User:El_C|El_C]] 19:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:24, 25 January 2021
Articles on villages in Somaliland - some improvements
I appreciate your work on creating article such as Jaamac Liibaan on various Somaliland villages. If you could, please make sure the referenes are not Bare URLs and instead use a citation template. Additionally, please format the page with a References section, under which a {{reflist}} template is placed. I've done this to demonstrate at Beer, Togdheer. Thanks! Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 17:46, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, got it👍🏾 Al-Burcaawi (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020
Hello, I'm CloudBubble26. An edit that you recently made to Signing of Somaliland Declaration of Independence seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!Template:Z191
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Signing of Somaliland Declaration of Independence. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Template:Z193
I tried to merge the two articles as the signing article is not needed and can easily be covered in the declaration article. Al-Burcaawi (talk) 04:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Issaq
i am delighted to have read about my issaq family. May I ask you to report or write more about it, for example which important or well-known (famous) people belong to issaq. There are so many people who belong to issaq. Thank you for your understanding Yosef maxamad (talk) 02:55, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Somalilanders
Hei, @User:Al-Burcaawi Cloud you create Somalilanders Page in Wikipedia?
Thank you. Lakmi00 (talk) 19:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
I'll see what I can do👍🏾 Al-Burcaawi (talk) 00:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you 🙏🏽 Lakmi00 (talk) 07:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Issaq
I'm doing research on issaq , could you please write about Notes References Further reading External links
would have been helpful thanks Yosef maxamad (talk) 00:17, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
There's already a page about Isaaq inadeer. If you'd like to improve on it, then by all means please do. Al-Burcaawi (talk) 00:53, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Administrative regions of Somaliland
Hei,
Here is the Somaliland regions map from @Jacob300:
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Somaliland_regions.svg
And here is the Somaliland districts map from @Jacob300:
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Somaliland_districts.svg
Could you create page in Wikipedia about Administrative regions of Somaliland
Thank you🙏🏽 Lakmi00 (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
I think there already is one but I'll see what I can do👍🏾 Al-Burcaawi (talk) 00:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
@Al-Burcaawi: Thanks a lot. 🙏🏽 Lakmi00 (talk) 07:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Editor Warring Warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
- Please use the talk pages instead of engaging in an edit war, this is considered disruptive behaviour on Wikipedia and may lead to your account being sanctioned SultanSanaag (talk) 21:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
You're the only one who disagrees, you're an unreliable editor Al-Burcaawi (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- This matter is rather simple and please check with any community onsite the radical de-factor state and their editors about the rightful country that this town is in. Here's a good start Badhan, Somalia or here [1] and here [2]. Refrain from reverting the article again please and the edit warring on this matter. Thanks SultanSanaag (talk) 01:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Somalia has no jurisdiction over Somaliland, it is therefore misleading to indicate this area as being under Somalia, as that would indicate Somalian control, which is false.
Just like how Taiwanese towns aren't marked as part of China, Somaliland towns shouldn't be marked as part of Somalia either. I believe a consensus has already been reached earlier in regards to this.
It seems your political affiliation and bias is at play here. No one is disputing Somaliland's lack of recognition, but marking its towns as part of Somalia is very misleading. Somalia isn't a complete state either. Al-Burcaawi (talk) 03:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Badhan, Sanaag is covered by discretionary sanctions under the Horn of Africa decision
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 You've been alerted per the complaint at WP:AN3. Any warring to change to Somaliland to Somalia or vice versa may lead to a block. Editors must get consensus. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 23:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a play group
Wikipedia is not a play ground. You need to stop repeated unexplained removal of sourced content. Thank you Buufin (talk) 21:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
I have not removed a single source, while here you are reverting my edits for nothing. I have, if anything, added content to these articles while you have been removing them. I suggest you cease and desist. Al-Burcaawi (talk) 21:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia if you continue vandalizing every page. Buufin (talk) 21:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
You're reverting sensible edits and improvements to pages including Somaliland's cities. It's hard adding content when you're removing it Dabaqabad (talk) 00:14, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Persistent disruptive editing!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirshore (talk • contribs) 08:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
January 2021
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision diffs
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 06:47, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Xagal, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. The claim that this location is "populated by the Habr Je'lo clan of the Isaaq clan family" was not supported by existing references and thus was removed. Please refrain from adding unsourced material to Wikipedia articles. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Karin, Sahil. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Add Edit Summary
Hi Dabaqabad,
When you edit, make sure that you always add edit summary. If you don’t add it, it will be reverted by the administrators. Buufin (talk) 04:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
No problem Dabaqabad (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of regions of Somaliland by Human Development Index for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of regions of Somaliland by Human Development Index until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Image
Hey there here is better Berbera image For you:
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Berbera,_Somaliland.jpg
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Berbera_city,_Somaliland.jpg Lakmi00 (talk) 16:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Can you put them in for me? I'm a bit busy atm Dabaqabad (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
I tried but the page is protected I cannot change the page, which is why I want you to change it. Lakmi00 (talk) 20:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
No problem I'll do it when I got time Dabaqabad (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you 🙏🏽 Lakmi00 (talk) 20:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
SLgovernment Page
Hey there 👋🏽 Could you create page for Somaliland government.
Thanks🙏🏽 Lakmi00 (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Stop Deleting sources
You are deleting sources without discussing on the talk page.
Kindly discuss before deleting any sources or else I will ask the admin to step in. Hurbad (talk) 19:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
I have put in a report this as an incident , kindly visit the incident page or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents Hurbad (talk) 19:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Dabaqabad. The discussion is about the topic Dabaqabad. Thank you. 19:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurbad (talk • contribs)
Somalia does not border Djibouti nor does its control extend to the border. I have added Somaliland with a note explaining that its a self-declared state that is not recognized internationally, however you seem to have a problem with mentions of Somaliland. You have been vandalizing several pages to advance your political view as showed here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1002243849 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1002244981 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mohamed_Abdullahi_Mohamed&diff=prev&oldid=991384025 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sharif_Sheikh_Ahmed&diff=prev&oldid=952765556 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hassan_Sheikh_Mohamud&diff=prev&oldid=960916917 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Somalia&diff=prev&oldid=907071277 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arabic&diff=prev&oldid=671499655
Judging by wording used like "violating sovereignty", your extensive history of editing Somaliland-related articles (ongoing since 2015), your lack of constructive contributions, your wording and dedication to pushing your agenda, it is clear that you have editorial bias and therefore I can conclude that you have been breaking NPOV as per https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view. I suggest you come to the table and we can sort this out or else I will have no choice but to report you. Dabaqabad (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Forgot to add this too:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tigray_War&oldid=1001639699 Dabaqabad (talk) 19:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
January 2021
Your recent editing history at Module:Location map/data/Somalia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -FASTILY 10:41, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Ae block
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
El_C 19:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)