→Joseph Coyetty: reply |
m →Joseph Coyetty and copyright: fix formatting |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
==Joseph Coyetty and copyright== |
==Joseph Coyetty and copyright== |
||
Please explain where the copyright violation was? I looked at both the article and the provided URL and there was no copyright violation. Are you quite sure you understand what copyright violation is? While the topic is the same they do not share '''any''' sentences in common. Please see [[Wikipedia:Copyrights#Using copyrighted work from others |
Please explain where the copyright violation was? I looked at both the article and the provided URL and there was no copyright violation. Are you quite sure you understand what copyright violation is? While the topic is the same they do not share '''any''' sentences in common. Please see [[Wikipedia:Copyrights#Using copyrighted work from others|here for guidance]], in particular "Note that copyright law governs the creative expression of ideas, not the ideas or information themselves. Therefore, it is legal to read an encyclopedia article or other work, reformulate the concepts in your own words, and submit it to Wikipedia". I trust this is now clear. -- [[User:Mattinbgn|Mattinbgn]]\<sup> [[User talk:Mattinbgn|talk]]</sup> 02:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:08, 27 September 2007
Please post all entries below the line below, and start new entries at the bottom of the page. Thank you.
A note on assuming good faith...
When someone is saying something like "i hope you die, you stupid jew"[1], you don't really need to bother with assuming good faith. ;)
I replaced your light note with a block notice, since I'd already blocked that IP just prior to your leaving them the note. Next time, you could probably just take them straight to AIV (where hopefully nobody would balk at a lack of warnings). EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there; seem to be having a little trouble with this guy; he's been vandalising Theft over the past five days, and I've reverted every time. He's now (as you will see) having a go at my Userpage. Not sure where to go with this one, as he's an anon IP block. Any ideas? --Rodhullandemu 21:07, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. --Rodhullandemu 21:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
okay, well that is my own user page so i don't think it really matters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.196.68 (talk) 03:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
I went ahead and indef blocked Matine before I saw your most recent warning. He'd already been issued a 3 level and then a bv warning so I figured a block was appropriate as it was clearly a vandalism only acct and was ignoring the warnings. I replaced your last warning with the block notice, as they were in response to the same edit, just wanted to give you a heads up. GoodnightmushTalk 21:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Probably 81.77.254.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), some random vandal. --Tagishsimon (talk) 08:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 06:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
A user claiming some legal authority
Hi Corvus cornix. Some time ago you asked me on my talk page to check up on the Swedish UNNET/UNOMBUD guy named Peter Lundgren. I have tried every now and then to call him but he never answers. And his parents have unlisted phone numbers so I can not reach them. So I will not bother about doing anything more. If he bothers Wikipedia again tell me. And then I will contact him by fax or letter or some other more direct means.
--David Göthberg 14:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Wilderness Confederate Order of Battle
Hi! Please do not change the name of this article, as it is consistent with the naming convention we use for ALL Civil War orders of battle. Please see Category:American Civil War orders of battle and you note that we want the battle's name to show up first. Thanks for the inquiry! 8th Ohio Volunteers 21:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking. By the way, feel free to visit WP:ACW for more information on Civil War naming conventions, biography and article guidelines, and suggested manual of style. 8th Ohio Volunteers 21:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. Thank you for nominating this article. I have located evidence that this is not only not notable, but has verifiably false statements of fact. Another editor has written that it's a copyvio. See the AfD discussion and the article itself. Bearian 22:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- It gets so many hits with keywords because somebody placed them out there. It's called spam. Bearian 22:18, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
User: Qiubowiki
Both you and I are watching this user. Let's try and make sure we don't pound him with two warnings for each incident. Icestorm815 23:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- I wasn't accusing you, I just wanted to make sure he didn't get warnings he shouldn't have, that's all. Oh well, its over anyways. :) Icestorm815 19:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
The Raven FAC
Hello! You had left a comment on the FAC page for "The Raven" - I made the citations you suggested, and thanks for pointing them out. I wondered if you wanted to take a second look? It's gotten lots of comments but very few votes! See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Raven. --Midnightdreary 04:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Jeopardy
Was being on the show fun, or nerve wracking. I have a friend that was on, and she said it was over in a flash. Did you upload the video to youtube? I should upload hers for her. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 23:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Tme2nsb
I am aware of this, thanks for the reminder, though. I thought he/she was changing the words of other editors. --Kukini hablame aqui 21:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Gotcha. Keep up the good work! --Kukini hablame aqui 21:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
dolhijn
you removed all my pages concerning the history ofr cinema because they do not comlpy ? They are spot on. I have the most comprehensive source of world cinema online, in ALL countries of the world. Those European-films.net links which are on almost all cinema pages dont comply. I think u are random in your choice of deletion. I even saw rottentomatoes.com, a totally commercial site on the USA page. I think you should explain to me why my pages, which are fully dedicated to the history of cinema in the respective countries are not compliant and those pages are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolhijn (talk • contribs) 21:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry
I was mad for what the person did, and usually get mad when non valid info is added, i appologize --Yankeesrj12 23:09, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Done please look and respond on what you think --Yankeesrj12 23:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Nope I dont, and once again sorry :) --Yankeesrj12 23:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Joseph Coyetty
Just a heads up. I removed your {{nonsense}} tag on Joseph Coyetty, as there are several reliable sources that do give him as the inventor of modern toilet paper. (Is he notable? That's an entirely different question. *grin*) --Fabrictramp 23:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Joseph Coyetty and copyright
Please explain where the copyright violation was? I looked at both the article and the provided URL and there was no copyright violation. Are you quite sure you understand what copyright violation is? While the topic is the same they do not share any sentences in common. Please see here for guidance, in particular "Note that copyright law governs the creative expression of ideas, not the ideas or information themselves. Therefore, it is legal to read an encyclopedia article or other work, reformulate the concepts in your own words, and submit it to Wikipedia". I trust this is now clear. -- Mattinbgn\ talk 02:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)