→Use of edit summaries: new section |
→Edit warring: new section |
||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
{{Div col end}} |
{{Div col end}} |
||
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. And please ensure that the summary describes the changes made.<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 13:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC) |
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. And please ensure that the summary describes the changes made.<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 13:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Edit warring == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Signedzzz|zzz]] ([[User talk:Signedzzz|talk]]) 15:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:22, 29 July 2016
Welcome!
Hello, Chas. Caltrop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 20:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Flying buttress may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- were constructed from no more than one thickness of [[voussoir]] with a capping stone above it (see for example the cathedrals of [[Amiens Cathedral|Amiens]], [[Le Mans Cathedral|Le Mans]] and [[
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 19 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Paolo Veronese page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Turner Diaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IBM and the Holocaust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capitulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trial of Socrates may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/morph?l=oi%29%3Dstros&la=greek&can=oi%29%3Dstros0&prior=oi)/stros#lexicon |title=Greek Word Study Tool |publisher=Perseus.tufts.edu |date= |accessdate=2014-07-
- In ''The Trial of Socrates'' (1988), [[I. F. Stone] said that Socrates wanted to be sentenced to death, in order to justify his
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
The Wedding at Cana
Hallo, Chas. Caltrop! Perhaps I should further explain my edit: "looting" is something individual soldiers do for their personal gain. Those of low rank, that is. If you claim that Napoleon "looted", it either sounds farcical or expresses a strong value judgement. Wikipedia should be neither comical nor moralising. There is also a fundamental problem of factual correctness: the 1797 appropriations did not benefit the personal wealth of Napoleon but made the objects seized, property of the French people. The French revolutionary armies were accompanied by special représentants du peuple who systematically took all objects of scientific and artistic interest and had them transported to the collections in Paris. Greetings, --MWAK (talk) 20:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trial of Socrates, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lycon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flying buttress, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Church and Span (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to McCarthyism may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- for [the] belief that the person involved is disloyal to the Government of the United States”.<ref>{{Cite book | title=The Constitution of the Truman Presidency and the Post–World War II Era| editor1-
- Soviet Espionage in America—The Stalin Era (New York: Modern Library, 2000) ISBN 978-0-375-75536-1), pp. 48, 158, 162, 169, 229</ref><ref>M. Stanton Evans, Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:31, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to McCarthyism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- deny labor-law recognition the CPUSA in the unemployment compensation system of New York state. '[The New York Post'' newspaper said that the Act was “a monstrosity . . . a wretched repudiation of
- Soviet Espionage in America—The Stalin Era (New York: Modern Library, 2000) ISBN 978-0-375-75536-1), pp. 48, 158, 162, 169, 229</ref><ref>M. Stanton Evans, Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:46, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
I notice that you've engage in what amounts to a fundamental rewrite of the article. While certainly permissable via WP:BRD, I'm concerned a bit by a general abandonment of summary style in this article as well as by other stylistic and substantive issues. The addition of good scholarly sources is greatly appreciated but I do have those and other concerns, for instance with images being excessively used and the captions overlong, section headers, and other things that I've mentioned on the talk page. Excessive detail is my primary concern, but the other too, as they take time to clean up. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 15:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
You are engaged in an "edit war" in McCarthyism. Please and be mindful of the three-revert rule. Per WP:BRD please discuss any changes on the talk page. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 19:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Apology (Plato), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pantheon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Use of edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. And please ensure that the summary describes the changes made. zzz (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Edit warring
Your recent editing history at On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. zzz (talk) 15:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)