BracketBot (talk | contribs) Bot: Notice of potential markup breaking |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
*<nowiki>In ''The Trial of Socrates'' (1988), </nowiki>{{red|'''['''}}<nowiki>[I. F. Stone] said that Socrates wanted to be sentenced to death, in order to justify his</nowiki> |
*<nowiki>In ''The Trial of Socrates'' (1988), </nowiki>{{red|'''['''}}<nowiki>[I. F. Stone] said that Socrates wanted to be sentenced to death, in order to justify his</nowiki> |
||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 17:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC) |
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow [[User:BracketBot#Opting out|these opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, <!-- (0, 1, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->[[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]] ([[User talk:BracketBot|talk]]) 17:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC) |
||
==''The Wedding at Cana''== |
|||
Hallo, Chas. Caltrop! Perhaps I should further explain my edit: "looting" is something individual soldiers do for their personal gain. Those of low rank, that is. If you claim that Napoleon "looted", it either sounds farcical or expresses a strong value judgement. Wikipedia should be neither comical nor moralising. There is also a fundamental problem of factual correctness: the 1797 appropriations did not benefit the personal wealth of Napoleon but made the objects seized, property of the French people. The French revolutionary armies were accompanied by special ''représentants du peuple'' who systematically took all objects of scientific and artistic interest and had them transported to the collections in Paris. Greetings, --[[User:MWAK|MWAK]] ([[User talk:MWAK|talk]]) 20:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:11, 1 June 2016
Welcome!
Hello, Chas. Caltrop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 20:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Flying buttress may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- were constructed from no more than one thickness of [[voussoir]] with a capping stone above it (see for example the cathedrals of [[Amiens Cathedral|Amiens]], [[Le Mans Cathedral|Le Mans]] and [[
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:50, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 19 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Paolo Veronese page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Turner Diaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Alliance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IBM and the Holocaust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capitulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trial of Socrates may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/morph?l=oi%29%3Dstros&la=greek&can=oi%29%3Dstros0&prior=oi)/stros#lexicon |title=Greek Word Study Tool |publisher=Perseus.tufts.edu |date= |accessdate=2014-07-
- In ''The Trial of Socrates'' (1988), [[I. F. Stone] said that Socrates wanted to be sentenced to death, in order to justify his
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
The Wedding at Cana
Hallo, Chas. Caltrop! Perhaps I should further explain my edit: "looting" is something individual soldiers do for their personal gain. Those of low rank, that is. If you claim that Napoleon "looted", it either sounds farcical or expresses a strong value judgement. Wikipedia should be neither comical nor moralising. There is also a fundamental problem of factual correctness: the 1797 appropriations did not benefit the personal wealth of Napoleon but made the objects seized, property of the French people. The French revolutionary armies were accompanied by special représentants du peuple who systematically took all objects of scientific and artistic interest and had them transported to the collections in Paris. Greetings, --MWAK (talk) 20:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)