Response |
→September 2012: add |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Before issuing summary warnings, how about trying some discussion on the issue itself on the talk page - third request? Of if you prefer, let's ask a third opinion. [[User:Cpsoper|Cpsoper]] ([[User talk:Cpsoper|talk]]) 18:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC) |
Before issuing summary warnings, how about trying some discussion on the issue itself on the talk page - third request? Of if you prefer, let's ask a third opinion. [[User:Cpsoper|Cpsoper]] ([[User talk:Cpsoper|talk]]) 18:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
== September 2012 == |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Yitzhak Kaduri]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:TALKDONTREVERT|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[WP:CONSENSUS|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> |
|||
Please be particularly aware, [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> <code>[[User:Zad68|<span style="color:#D2691E">'''Zad'''</span>]][[User_Talk:Zad68|<span style="color:#206060">''68''</span>]]</code> 14:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:Botsystem, you have been edit-warring in unsourced [[WP:OR|original research]] and suggestions of [[WP:SYNTH|synthesis]] at [[Yitzhak Kaduri]]. It has been a slow edit-war, but it is still edit-warring. You must stop doing this. You have been invited by Cpsoper to discuss your changes here on your Talk page, at the article Talk page, and in edit summaries, but you have chosen not to discuss your proposed changes. This is edit-warring, and it can lead to you being blocked. The next time you edit-war at the article, I will put in a request at [[WP:EWN]] to have your edits reviewed and for appropriate administrator action to be taken. <code>[[User:Zad68|<span style="color:#D2691E">'''Zad'''</span>]][[User_Talk:Zad68|<span style="color:#206060">''68''</span>]]</code> 14:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:11, 7 September 2012
I invite you to explain your description of recent edits on the talk page, here Talk:Yitzhak_Kaduri#.22Note.22_proposal. Cpsoper (talk) 20:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
I appreciate you have a long history of edits, but I am concerned about your lack of willingness to discuss these recent edits, pls reply as above. Cpsoper (talk) 11:09, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
The article has been restored, your contentious POV edits and removal of sourced information has been reverted. It will be wise to refrain from making opinion based edits. Articles must be backed with facts POV is not tolerated on Wikipedia, you've been warned again!
Before issuing summary warnings, how about trying some discussion on the issue itself on the talk page - third request? Of if you prefer, let's ask a third opinion. Cpsoper (talk) 18:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/30px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Yitzhak Kaduri. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Zad68
14:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
- Botsystem, you have been edit-warring in unsourced original research and suggestions of synthesis at Yitzhak Kaduri. It has been a slow edit-war, but it is still edit-warring. You must stop doing this. You have been invited by Cpsoper to discuss your changes here on your Talk page, at the article Talk page, and in edit summaries, but you have chosen not to discuss your proposed changes. This is edit-warring, and it can lead to you being blocked. The next time you edit-war at the article, I will put in a request at WP:EWN to have your edits reviewed and for appropriate administrator action to be taken.
Zad68
14:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)