mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | {{unblock|There is no reason listed for me to have been warned by an admin, but then later blocked, even though I had no mainspace edits after [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:BigK_HeX_reported_by_User:ThinkEnemies_.28Result:_Content_dispute_taken_to_appropriate_venue.29|the warning]] about the content dispute. If I'm getting hit because of another editor's persistence, then it seems pretty strange to ensnare me, because ''someone else'' decided to persist in editing after the warning when I took no further actions and had no intention of further reverts. Even after the Tea Party text was reverted yet again by another editor, I've been content to let the matter receive attention at the [[Wikipedia:Content_noticeboard#Tea_Party_movement|Content Noticeboard]], per [[User:SGGH]]. }} |
||
Line 39: | Line 37: | ||
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|left|31px]] '''You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' {{#if:|until '''{{{until}}}'''|for a period of '''twenty-four hours'''}} for '''edit-warring on [[Tea Party movement]]'''. To contest this block, please reply here on your '''talk page''' by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block]]. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 09:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC) </div><!-- Template:GBlock --> |
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|left|31px]] '''You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' {{#if:|until '''{{{until}}}'''|for a period of '''twenty-four hours'''}} for '''edit-warring on [[Tea Party movement]]'''. To contest this block, please reply here on your '''talk page''' by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block]]. -- '''[[User:Tariqabjotu|<font color="black">tariq</font><font color="gray">abjotu</font>]]''' 09:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC) </div><!-- Template:GBlock --> |
||
⚫ | {{tlx|1=unblock|2=There is no reason listed for me to have been warned by an admin, but then later blocked, even though I had no mainspace edits after [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:BigK_HeX_reported_by_User:ThinkEnemies_.28Result:_Content_dispute_taken_to_appropriate_venue.29|the warning]] about the content dispute. If I'm getting hit because of another editor's persistence, then it seems pretty strange to ensnare me, because ''someone else'' decided to persist in editing after the warning when I took no further actions and had no intention of further reverts. Even after the Tea Party text was reverted yet again by another editor, I've been content to let the matter receive attention at the [[Wikipedia:Content_noticeboard#Tea_Party_movement|Content Noticeboard]], per [[User:SGGH]]. }} |
||
{| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" |
|||
|- |
|||
| valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em" | [[File:Artículo bueno.svg|50 px]] |
|||
| style="padding: 0.1em" | |
|||
'''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s): |
|||
<br><br>Editor had stopped edit warring after being warned, and was continuing discussion in the proper venue; block is unnecessary. |
|||
''Request handled by:'' [[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|::==( o )]]</small></sup> |
|||
<small> '''Unblocking administrator''': Please check for <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~eagle/autoblockfinder.php?user={{PAGENAMEE}} active autoblocks] on this user after accepting the unblock request.</small> |
|||
<!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> |
|||
|} |
Revision as of 15:12, 12 June 2010
|
|
||||||
Hi!
- If you'd like to begin a conversation, simply please.
- Please do sign your comments by typing four tildes (~~~~).
- Please note: At best, comments containing personal attacks will be deleted and then ignored.
Reported for violating WP:3RR
I didn't want to use a template on you. I have reported you after making a 4th revert in dispute, as previously warned.Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring †TE†Talk 20:11, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
{{unblock|There is no reason listed for me to have been warned by an admin, but then later blocked, even though I had no mainspace edits after the warning about the content dispute. If I'm getting hit because of another editor's persistence, then it seems pretty strange to ensnare me, because someone else decided to persist in editing after the warning when I took no further actions and had no intention of further reverts. Even after the Tea Party text was reverted yet again by another editor, I've been content to let the matter receive attention at the Content Noticeboard, per User:SGGH.}}