Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Nate Fish. (TW) |
Basketballfan12 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 166: | Line 166: | ||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 03:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC) |
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 03:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC) |
||
The author made some comments on the talk page, justifying his notability. [[User:Basketballfan12|Basketballfan12]] ([[User talk:Basketballfan12#top|talk]]) 04:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:23, 7 June 2016
Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Steve Swetoha. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
New basketball articles
There is a discussion regarding your creation of basketball articles at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Basketball_Association#User:Basketballfan12_-_creating_non-notable_NBA_bio_stubs. Given that a number of your creations have been nominated at WP:AfD, may I suggest that you take a break from creating articles until those AfDs are resolved. In the interim, you could create articles in the Draft namespace, if needed. Perhaps you'll be vindicated after the outcome of those AfDs, but it seems the least disruptive for all parties involved if you take a break for the time being. Let me know if you have an alternative ideas. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 02:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Chris Makris for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Makris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Makris until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Dan Tolzman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Tolzman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Tolzman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hapoel Hof HaSharon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hapoel Hof HaSharon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapoel Hof HaSharon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Ironi Kiryat Ono for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ironi Kiryat Ono is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ironi Kiryat Ono until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:23, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Maccabi Hadera (basketball) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maccabi Hadera (basketball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maccabi Hadera (basketball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Maccabi Rehovot B.C. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maccabi Rehovot B.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maccabi Rehovot B.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hapoel Acre B.C. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hapoel Acre B.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapoel Acre B.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hapoel Emek Yizra'el for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hapoel Emek Yizra'el is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapoel Emek Yizra'el until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hapoel Migdal HaEmek B.C. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hapoel Migdal HaEmek B.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapoel Migdal HaEmek B.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hapoel Kfar Saba B.C. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hapoel Kfar Saba B.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapoel Kfar Saba B.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Maccabi Bat Yam B.C. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maccabi Bat Yam B.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maccabi Bat Yam B.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hapoel Hevel Eilot for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hapoel Hevel Eilot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapoel Hevel Eilot until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hapoel Be'er Tuvia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hapoel Be'er Tuvia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapoel Be'er Tuvia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Beitar Kfar Yona for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beitar Kfar Yona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beitar Kfar Yona until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hapoel Nesher for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hapoel Nesher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapoel Nesher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hapoel Emek Hefer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hapoel Emek Hefer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapoel Emek Hefer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Hapoel Ramat Gan Givatayim B.C. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hapoel Ramat Gan Givatayim B.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapoel Ramat Gan Givatayim B.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Joe Boylan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Boylan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Boylan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Jeremis Smith for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeremis Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremis Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Oded Brandwein for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oded Brandwein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oded Brandwein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 22:43, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steve Brown (outfielder), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hits (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
2016 Brazil Roster World Baseball Classic
I have moved the above back to your user space as there's not enough content here for an article. It's located at User:Basketballfan12/sandbox2. — Diannaa (talk) 02:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC).
Thank you! Basketballfan12 (talk) 03:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Administrator noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Proposed topic ban for User:Basketballfan12". Thank you.—Bagumba (talk) 02:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- I would very much recommend responding to this proposal, as your unwillingness to collaborate with others or respond to issues is a key part of the proposed topic ban. InsertCleverPhraseHere 05:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC).
- "We"? What is this account, some kind of entity? That generic response does not help your cause. DaHuzyBru (talk) 15:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
The author did not know that sports executives with credentials other than playing professionally ie. Chris Makaris for example,who is an up and coming executive in the Memphis Grizzles organization is not considered notable as he also serves as the Director of Basketball Operations? If you work as an executive in the NBA D League should it be notable? The NBA D League is a fast growing sports development league in the US. The author only became aware of the other circumstances after reading the notifications recently as the author has been busy with outside project. If given another opportunity, the author will follow the Wikipedia criteria for notability of teams and players.Basketballfan12 (talk) 21:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hey, is English your primary language? I ask because of your speaking in the third person and the use of the royal 'we'. Are you editing by yourself, or are you working with other basketball fans under the same account? Some clarity is needed rather quickly, or you might find yourself in some difficulty. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 00:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nate Fish
The article Nate Fish has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable minor league baseball player. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BASE/N (qualifying tournaments do not count for BASE/N#2).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Nate Fish for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nate Fish is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Fish until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The author made some comments on the talk page, justifying his notability. Basketballfan12 (talk) 04:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)