Welcome
|
{{helpme}}
Three things, first of all, how did you find me, who are you, and why did you create my user talk page. Second, what is adoption? Third, are you an administrator? Last thing, on my page, Rod Machado, wil you delete the file link to a photo and put that photo on the right at the top of the article?--Spencer Divonn'io the glorious (talk) 04:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- I am Narutolovehinata5. I have been on Wikipedia for six months, doing mostly new page patrol and occasional welcoming and reverting vandalism. I found you via an AFD you participated in. Anyway, I can't help you for I am still technically a newbie, as my friend Eco for help.
- Narutohinata probably just saw that you were a new user, created your page in order to welcome you to the project, adoption is a process whereby experienced editors help newer editors learn the ropes, and no, is not an admin. Finally, Rod Machado is not 'your' page. The link to the file is easily deleted by you, as the image doesn't actually exist. // roux 04:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
December 2008
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Rod Machado. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 05:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
It was resolved by an administrator.Spencer Divonn'io the glorious (talk) 05:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
- Well.. the discussion is still open. It could be argued that the discussion could be closed as keep at this point (note that AfD discussions should generally only be closed by uninvolved people), but it is most definitely not marked as resolved. // roux 05:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Anhydrobiosis, please do not post spam as you did on my talk page. To upload an image, please stay and make edits for 4 days. Get at least 10 edits and you will be autoconfirmed, then press the "Upload file" button in the toolbox section on the left panel. Make sure the image is "free" or that it is yours, from the U.S. government, more than 200 years old, or compatible with Wikipedia's licences before uploading. Have fun and happy uploading! Merry Christmas, from ComputerGuy talk 16:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I found the page with the information I left it with. I was simply correcting the grammar. You don't need a source for that.Spencer Divonn'io the glorious (talk) 23:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Virtual Console. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJ Spyke 23:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ginger (disambiguation). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Martin451 (talk) 00:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Excuse me? I reverted that change because it was deleted without any apparent reason. I am a member of the Counter Vandalism Unit. I did not insert it, I simply put it back because it was deleted without a reason.Spencer Divonn'io the glorious (talk) 00:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- If you look at the history of Ginger_(disambiguation), you will see that 20.187.40.127 vandalised that page, 73.133.197.212 then reverted that vandalism. You then reverted 73.133.197.212s removal of the vandalism, which looked to me like vandalism. (Ginger-vitis is not a disease causing people to have ginger hair). If something is removed for not apparent reason, it does not mean it is a bad edit, I often edit without leaving notes in the summary, esp. when making repeated edits. If you are checking for vandalism, please read what you are reverting. We all make mistakes, I also make mistakes when reverting vandalism. Martin451 (talk) 01:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Would you care to explain this edit? Please do not characterize legitimate edits as vandalism; "vandalism" has a very strict definition on Wikipedia, and this certainly did not qualify. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Your reverts
Your notice to another editor regarding original research was a bit off the mark. The edit you reverted was actually fine; it was itself a revert of your inappropriate edit. If you feel the lead sentence in the paragraph is inappropriate, please discuss it on the talk page, or place a tag such as {{Fact}}. Frank | talk 20:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)