60.42.252.205 (talk) note re intimidation |
Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Comfort women. (TW) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument, whittle down the written English and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --[[Special:Contributions/60.42.252.205|60.42.252.205]] ([[User talk:60.42.252.205#top|talk]]) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |
What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument, whittle down the written English and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --[[Special:Contributions/60.42.252.205|60.42.252.205]] ([[User talk:60.42.252.205#top|talk]]) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
== June 2008 == |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Comfort women|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Comfort women]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Jaysweet|Jaysweet]] ([[User talk:Jaysweet|talk]]) 18:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a shared [[IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' |
Revision as of 18:51, 12 June 2008
I performed some mainly copyedits [1] on the contentious Comfort Women page which carries two major tags requiring work. I responded to other editors reasonable questions.
Very shortly after, I received a number of increasingly hysteria warning threats [2] and revisions from a Pro-Korean editors Caspian_blue [3].
I recognised that I was being set up in an attempted WP:3RR or IP admin that would support his POV and post a note of this on his page [4] ... preempting exactly what I suspected 1 minute later [5].
Then followed a complaint by the user to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism. [6]
What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument, whittle down the written English and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --60.42.252.205 (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Comfort women. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Jaysweet (talk) 18:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.