203.35.135.133 (talk) →Call for consensus: Dead/Alive/Unknown: new section |
2607:fcc8:b886:7200:a010:11bf:b579:520a (talk) Notice. |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
On [[Spooks]].[[Special:Contributions/203.35.135.133|203.35.135.133]] ([[User talk:203.35.135.133|talk]]) 09:28, 11 June 2011 (UTC) |
On [[Spooks]].[[Special:Contributions/203.35.135.133|203.35.135.133]] ([[User talk:203.35.135.133|talk]]) 09:28, 11 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== |
|||
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. |
Revision as of 03:47, 5 June 2014
Canvassing Warning.
On the topic in question there were 2 other logged in accounts, one who was against my changes and had already discussed it and the other who seems to believe Lucas isn't dead but that currently the proof is that we don't know so have to stick to the old version. So, yeah, he may be bias in the direction of the result I want, but not in the direction of accepting unreliable sources. But the problem is the only other people commenting that were IPs that had made limited postings. They may not have static IPs and never get the message, they may already be participants, they may be people who don't visit enough to get the message. So I went for the only option. Duggy 1138 (talk) 23:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Call for consensus: Dead/Alive/Unknown
On Spooks.203.35.135.133 (talk) 09:28, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.