Sagecandor (talk | contribs) →Sylvia Plath: cmt |
→A barnstar for you!: Barnstar of good faith |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
:::::::::Obviously they were made in the article considering it was the deletion of the "Dreamers" poem which I deleted several years ago and that decision still stands. Are you a troll? Bluesphere needs to be blocked if this behavior continues. --[[User:Matt723star|Matt723star]] ([[User talk:Matt723star|talk]]) 04:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |
:::::::::Obviously they were made in the article considering it was the deletion of the "Dreamers" poem which I deleted several years ago and that decision still stands. Are you a troll? Bluesphere needs to be blocked if this behavior continues. --[[User:Matt723star|Matt723star]] ([[User talk:Matt723star|talk]]) 04:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
{{outdent}}Okay, both of you, take a break from my talk page, please, thanks! [[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor#top|talk]]) 14:42, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |
{{outdent}}Okay, both of you, take a break from my talk page, please, thanks! [[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor#top|talk]]) 14:42, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
== A barnstar for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Special Barnstar Hires.png|100px]] |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Barnstar of good faith''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Awarded in appreciation of your willingness to change your mind when confronted with logical and courteous opposition, as demonstrated at [[Talk:Trump Tower (novel)#RfC about the author credits of first edition in first sentence]]. This attitude helps improve the encyclopedia for [[WP:Readers first]]. Thank you! — [[User:JFG|JFG]] <sup>[[User talk:JFG|talk]]</sup> 23:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
Revision as of 23:10, 7 July 2017
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Osborn
I gave you my word and I have decided to renominate the Norman Osborn article once again. I have worked really hard finding the sources and helped out with the cultural impact section. Hope it works Xtremeroller (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Xtremeroller:Thanks for letting me know. I'll have another look. And good luck to you ! Sagecandor (talk) 21:32, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
March for Science Portland
Happy to revisit Talk:March for Science Portland/GA1 whenever you are ready. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:50, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Another Believer:Really busy with babysitting lately after family member had a new baby. Will try to have a look soon. Sagecandor (talk) 21:33, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- No worries! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Disclosures and my views on editing
I've added the following section to my userpage:
Disclosures and my views on editing
1. I, Sagecandor, am just one person behind the account name. I agree with the Wikipedia policy of WP:ROLE and the Wikipedia policy of WP:NOSHARING. I agree with the provisions for such policy exceptions as specified by the Wikimedia Foundation and explained at Role account.
2. I, Sagecandor, am not a paid editor. I am against the practice of paid editing on Wikipedia. I agree with the Wikipedia policy WP:PAID and the provisions laid out by that policy. I have donated of my own charitable giving to the Wikimedia Foundation that operates Wikipedia. I have given freely of my own time to research and write new articles on Wikipedia.
Sagecandor (talk) 19:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- I would not let Winkelvi's comments get to you too much. I was actually going to come by this talk page to thank you for the well-written articles you have crafted and listed on your userpage. I'm not particularly fond of the man on some of the covers -- no offense to Mr. Trump or any views you may have -- but you put effort into quality content, not quantity. I respect that more than any editor who has pushed thousands of less meaningful stubs into mainspace just to get a +1 in their article stats. Keep up the good work, and if you are repeatedly WP:HOUNDed by anyone remember ANI is always open to help out.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 22:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you, theGracefulSlick, I really appreciate you coming by my user talk page to say this. Still, regardless, I stand by what I've said, above. I hope I wrote it clearly and okay. Sagecandor (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- I would add that denying the two concerns is not necessary and might actually be counterproductive. If you're not, you're not. Just ignore it. That would be my advice. Otherwise you get into a "he doth protest too much" situation. My best to you, Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 20:38, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Figureofnine and TheGracefulSlick:I already received a question about it. I responded to that question. I was ignored. I added it to my userpage. I'm not going to remove it now at this point. That would just be too much back and forth hassle. It's there. It's done. I wouldn't have added it if I hadn't been asked about it in the first place. But whatever, I was. And now it's there. I agree with you it's a statement of a non-issue. Yes, I've donated money to the Wikimedia Foundation as I agree with providing free knowledge to people and I agree with the Wikipedia policies including reliable sources. As far as The lady doth protest too much, methinks, fuck it, what the fuck am I supposed to do at this point, I was asked about it already and this is my answer. Sagecandor (talk) 22:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- OK, that's reasonable. I wasn't trying to say anything hostile, just mainly to express my sympathy and solidarity, as I think you're in the right. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 23:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Figureofnine:Oh I know, I know, thank you. After this, I'm just a little bit frustrated by the whole thing. Thank you. Sagecandor (talk) 00:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clint Watts
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clint Watts you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 13:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Sylvia Plath
You could not have passed this article for GA; its nominator is not a major contributor to it. If you'll take a look at the edit history, the nominator's name is nowhere to be found. It was a drive-by nom by someone who had never contributed to the article, which is a shame tbh... Bluesphere 14:33, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- I see it's currently a Featured Article Candidate at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sylvia Plath/archive1 as nominated by Matt723star. I wish them the best of luck with the Featured Article attempt. Sagecandor (talk) 14:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, wish someone luck who more or less enjoy the fruits of his labor. <scoff> (The article is no longer at the FAC page, btw.) Ciao Bluesphere 15:02, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, sorry you feel that way. Sagecandor (talk) 15:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator has been involved with page since at least 2013 [1] [2]. Sagecandor (talk) 19:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- This nomination is of complete seriousness. If it's not up to the FAC's code then it needs to be worked on so it may be one. It's ultimately deserving. I'm ultimately deserving because I've been an editor on it as Sage said since 2013. I'm also the one who got it to its GA status as of right now. You're shoving me and my nomination away based on nothing. --Matt723star (talk) 01:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Matt723star:I left a message about this at WT:FAC. Sagecandor (talk) 02:10, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Seriously, two revisions? Those weren't even made in the article, lol. I can only roll my eyes on this, unbelievable. Bluesphere 03:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'm glad the nominator has had interest in the article improving in quality, going back four years, to the year 2013. At this point, I'll defer to whatever the people at WP:FAC want to do with it. Sagecandor (talk) 03:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Obviously they were made in the article considering it was the deletion of the "Dreamers" poem which I deleted several years ago and that decision still stands. Are you a troll? Bluesphere needs to be blocked if this behavior continues. --Matt723star (talk) 04:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'm glad the nominator has had interest in the article improving in quality, going back four years, to the year 2013. At this point, I'll defer to whatever the people at WP:FAC want to do with it. Sagecandor (talk) 03:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Seriously, two revisions? Those weren't even made in the article, lol. I can only roll my eyes on this, unbelievable. Bluesphere 03:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Matt723star:I left a message about this at WT:FAC. Sagecandor (talk) 02:10, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- This nomination is of complete seriousness. If it's not up to the FAC's code then it needs to be worked on so it may be one. It's ultimately deserving. I'm ultimately deserving because I've been an editor on it as Sage said since 2013. I'm also the one who got it to its GA status as of right now. You're shoving me and my nomination away based on nothing. --Matt723star (talk) 01:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Nominator has been involved with page since at least 2013 [1] [2]. Sagecandor (talk) 19:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, sorry you feel that way. Sagecandor (talk) 15:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, wish someone luck who more or less enjoy the fruits of his labor. <scoff> (The article is no longer at the FAC page, btw.) Ciao Bluesphere 15:02, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Okay, both of you, take a break from my talk page, please, thanks! Sagecandor (talk) 14:42, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Barnstar of good faith | |
Awarded in appreciation of your willingness to change your mind when confronted with logical and courteous opposition, as demonstrated at Talk:Trump Tower (novel)#RfC about the author credits of first edition in first sentence. This attitude helps improve the encyclopedia for WP:Readers first. Thank you! — JFG talk 23:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC) |