Megalibrarygirl (talk | contribs) →Proposed interaction ban: question |
|||
Line 272: | Line 272: | ||
:{{U|Xxanthippe}}, since you pinged me - knowing full well I am in semi-retirement - I would certainly be happy to chime in here on Ritchie's behalf. And while you're about it, could you please have the courtesy to finally explain why you found it necessary to mention Wikimania 2020 on the arbcom case. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 12:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC) |
:{{U|Xxanthippe}}, since you pinged me - knowing full well I am in semi-retirement - I would certainly be happy to chime in here on Ritchie's behalf. And while you're about it, could you please have the courtesy to finally explain why you found it necessary to mention Wikimania 2020 on the arbcom case. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 12:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
::This is a bit old to be bringing up again, {{u|Xxanthippe}}. What's going on to dredge it back up? I'd completely forgotten about the incident and moved on. [[User:Megalibrarygirl|Megalibrarygirl]] ([[User talk:Megalibrarygirl|talk]]) 15:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:44, 22 March 2020
Shoes
Here in the tropics we don't often wear shoes. Mainly flipflops and never any footwear in houses or buildings. It's got to the stage that I don't care much now whichever way the cookie crumbles, not that by saying so I want to make their job any easier. When I said anything, I was accused of doubling down. Where I chose to turn off my watchlist for the rest of the vindictive tripe and turned to my piano and drum kit, it was called "no comment = guilty = desysop" by an arbitrator. Take your pick. There is no knowing how equitable the committee can be - or not, either this one or its previous composition, but they do appear to have a predilection for desysoping. Boing is very happy since he turned in his tools, so I guess I'll get along fine without them if I have to, I've handed them in a couple of times already for health related issues, and back in 2014 I took an entire 3 months off Wikipedia and no one noticed - not even the witch hunters. They only notice when you procedurally ask for for the tools back, and then they'll try to crucify you if they can. Sadly, there's a lot of truth in Money Emoji's statement. Now it's back to watching some of this - which I wrote, or this - which I wish I could play or even jazzing around some Bach and Chopin, which I can!. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's absolutely amazing how such a large, relatively new Committee can be taking so long. It wouldn't be so bad, but those who are uninvolved but who try to make it look as if they have an axe to grind, despite the pages being closed, are using the delay to keep piling on, even including the one who has become the major complainer. What a mess! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how to respond to this. I don't think anyone can deny the huge impact you have made on the project, not least for persuading me that I should give RfA a go in the first place. I did say some of the comments that sparked the Arbcom case off were out of line and not acceptable for an administrator to say; however, I don't think any of them rose to the level of a desysop. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:39, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Draft/test edit
Are you able to delete Draft:Ploedf, which seems to be vandalism or possibly a test edit? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Done. (You certainly have been). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:15, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Also is a Walter Brandt really needed with only one entry? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nope, I've moved the remaining article over to being the primary, and only, topic. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- 'Ere, Threesie me ol' china.... I 'ad that "extremely courteous" Ugly Patel in the back of me capital punishment cab the uvver night..... String 'em up, I say... it's the only Home Secretary language they understand! -- ChristieCabs123 (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, can you find something for a transport paragraph on this? There is some info in the history but wasn't sourced.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:55, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: There is unquestionably a significant amount of detail you could add about the stations; the problem is, as usual, all the good sources are offline. I am absolutely confident that The Directory of Railway Stations: Details Every Public and Private Passenger Station, Halt, Platform and Stopping Place, Past and Present will cite the opening and closing dates of both stations, but I don't have a copy (Redrose64 does, I believe), and the library's copy is "reference only" so I can never take it out. I think it's high time I actually bought my own copy given how prone I am to citing it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:18, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Cheapest available copy at the mo, fyi ——SN54129 12:27, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, it doesn't look like the sort of book you'd reprint in paperback. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- But comes with free gift? Martinevans123 (talk) 13:15, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, it doesn't look like the sort of book you'd reprint in paperback. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Cheapest available copy at the mo, fyi ——SN54129 12:27, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
You never know, you may win it during the Destubathon :-) Thanks. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Tsk tsk, Blofeld, that's paid editing and will get you teh banhammerz. :-P Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:34, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- I bet there's a billionaire trainspotter out there somewhere!! Looks better now. I'm strongly tempted to blast St Albans sometime..♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:20, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've used my copy of Butt to amend both Fakenham East railway station and Fakenham West railway station. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Redrose, that's very helpful. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:40, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've used my copy of Butt to amend both Fakenham East railway station and Fakenham West railway station. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:36, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- I bet there's a billionaire trainspotter out there somewhere!! Looks better now. I'm strongly tempted to blast St Albans sometime..♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:20, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Can you add a bit on transport for Watton, Norfolk to finish off what I did, no more for a while now, I have a contest to run soon!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- I can. In the meantime, I'm having a quick look at Berkshire Maestros (which sounds like a second hand car dealer, if I'm honest) to see if it's salvageable before it goes off to AfD ... again. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Haha, I'm picturing a car dealer who looks like Eddie Hearn too! Crap name, but it looks just about acceptable to me.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:16, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Remember to add the articles to the bottom list too, that's the most important thing!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oh yeah. Had look at Taunton Deane services but I can't think much to write about other than "Taunton Deane is a service area in the middle of nowhere. If you're here, you're probably heading from the Midlands or Bristol to somewhere nicer, but are just busting for a wee, so you had to stop...." anyway, you get the picture. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Some ten years ago there was a mass AfD for articles on motorway service stations (Taunton Deane was in the list), and Jeni (talk · contribs) was rather miffed as a result. Anyway, most motorway service stations are in the middle of nowhere, for several reasons:
- land requirement:
- they need a lot of space since the car parks, fuel retailers, and refreshment franchises all need to be within the site
- land is cheaper out in the country where compulsory demolition (with attendant compensation) is much less likely
- they like to have the service areas at fairly even spacing, and the large towns are randomly spaced
- there's no point putting them near large towns
- towns usually have all the necessary facilities already, albeit spread out and not one self-contained site
- with a few exceptions, service stations don't provide access from the motorway to the outside world, so the lack of a nearby town is not a disadvantage
- land requirement:
- Look at the earlier service stations on the M6 - Hilton Park, Keele, Knutsford, Charnock Richard. All named after villages or small towns, all about thirty miles apart. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 00:15, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Some ten years ago there was a mass AfD for articles on motorway service stations (Taunton Deane was in the list), and Jeni (talk · contribs) was rather miffed as a result. Anyway, most motorway service stations are in the middle of nowhere, for several reasons:
- Oh yeah. Had look at Taunton Deane services but I can't think much to write about other than "Taunton Deane is a service area in the middle of nowhere. If you're here, you're probably heading from the Midlands or Bristol to somewhere nicer, but are just busting for a wee, so you had to stop...." anyway, you get the picture. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Sandra Pinel
Hello, Ritchie333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sandra Pinel".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Megalibrarygirl: I can't for the life of me remember why I started this; any ideas? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:57, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Ritchie333: do you think it was part of an editathon? Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Five years! |
---|
Plenty of music on my talk, enjoy! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Romford Garden Suburb
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Underpass Festival
Hi there - attempting to set up a page to act as an archive for the bands who have played Sheffield's Underpass Festival - an annual festival starting this year.
It'll be a very similar page to the existing one for Sheffield's Tramlines fest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tramlines_Festival
You took the Underpass page down the other day - is the issue that Underpass Festival needs to have happened before we can have a wiki page?
Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23Copley23 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- @23Copley23: Wikipedia is a repository for historic information for researchers to look up. By definition, a festival that hasn't taken place yet is not going to have any coverage, so it's impossible to write a neutral and balanced article on it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pavilion Theatre (Bournemouth), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edwin Cooper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Add your opinion here please. Philafrenzy (talk) 06:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Greyfriars, Winchelsea
Hello! Your submission of Greyfriars, Winchelsea at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Espresso Addict (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
On yer shelf
You wouldn't happen to have ISBN 978-0-76790-956-3, I suppose...? Have a good weekend :) ——SN54129 12:44, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fraid not. I can check in the library tomorrow lunchtime if you want? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:13, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Very kind offer, but I've made it far too complicated. I've cited it 24 times (possibly, or possibly not, all from different pages) and now of course I want to attribute page numbers to 'em—so have to look up each index page and find where i've used it. What a palava.It's about £30 used; I got a good deal with the Trynka and Clayson books, less than a tenner for both, inc P&P. So it might be worth laying out for the other...could always give it me dad fer his birthday :D ——SN54129 13:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- I couldn't find the book in the library; also that book about old keyboards hasn't turned up yet. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- No worries, appreciate you looking. You got much on the Stones, early years especially? ——SN54129 16:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- This?
- Norman, Philip (1985) [1984]. The Stones. Ealing: Corgi Books. ISBN 0-552-12487-7.
- --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:15, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, Redrose64, d'you have that at arms length? ——SN54129 05:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- No. It's at the other end of the room, next to books about The Doors and the Sex Pistols. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Glimmer Twin, would you be able to go to the other end of the room, in your own time and have a look for something...? ...if it's not too late of course :) ——SN54129 20:21, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- No. It's at the other end of the room, next to books about The Doors and the Sex Pistols. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, Redrose64, d'you have that at arms length? ——SN54129 05:50, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- This?
- No worries, appreciate you looking. You got much on the Stones, early years especially? ——SN54129 16:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- I couldn't find the book in the library; also that book about old keyboards hasn't turned up yet. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Very kind offer, but I've made it far too complicated. I've cited it 24 times (possibly, or possibly not, all from different pages) and now of course I want to attribute page numbers to 'em—so have to look up each index page and find where i've used it. What a palava.It's about £30 used; I got a good deal with the Trynka and Clayson books, less than a tenner for both, inc P&P. So it might be worth laying out for the other...could always give it me dad fer his birthday :D ——SN54129 13:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Some nutritious non-Chinese space lettuce for you!
The interstellar Lactuca sativa of wiki industry | |
Escape the horrors of earthly Corvid-19 virus and enjoy some tasty space lettuce.
Thank you for all your efforts. |
Railway stations book
Did you buy that book then?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Which book? No, I borrowed them out of the library; or yesterday I had a bit of a blitz through stubs using the "reference only" books that were there. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
A Brucie Bonus for you!
Brucie Bonus of a colour television with teletext | |
Your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood or Bust (game show) made me laugh more than an AfD has any right to… YorkshireLad (talk) 18:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC) |
- What? Not the cuddly toy? Anyway, what did you think of the AfD, Bruno? It was like a whiiiirlwind of consensus to redirect so the history can be preserved to perrrrrfection! And Craig? One word - fab .... u ... lous, darling. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is fantastic. As the great man would say: you're my favourite. YorkshireLad (talk) 16:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Would you take a look at the edits I've made to this article? Primary author is an admin, I was kind of shocked at what they were using for sources and would like a second opinion as I'm not much for music articles. --valereee (talk) 20:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Valereee: I haven't looked at the history, but I think what we've now got as an article is okay. I don't know if everyone will agree he's notable, but there certainly seems to be detailed reliable coverage spaced apart regularly that shows that he is well known for basically doing "stand up" piano performances in odd places. A few more sources like a piece in The Guardian or The Independent would help, but the Irish Independent is a recognisable national broadsheet source. It's had a pretty rigorous DYK review so I think what we've got now will be alright. I recognise the pianos at King's Cross St Pancras tube station immediately and walk past them all the time. PS: My initial response was "I'm not getting involved with that, it sounds like a drama magnet" then realised I was thinking of somebody with a very similar name. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- hahaha, yeah, there's no way I'd go anywhere near that. I removed half the content and probably half the sources for the Kavanagh article. Just felt like it was a pretty big change for something that had gone through DYK. --valereee (talk) 21:36, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Wincheap
On 11 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wincheap, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a pub on Wincheap in Canterbury is believed to be the oldest continuously trading in the city? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wincheap. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wincheap), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for clearing everything up
The backward dates, I mean. I was wrong to insist they go forward and lead somewhere, despite still being right in retrospect. It may not have been difficult, with your suspiciously efficient superspeed, but the setup didn't seem easy. It was a dirty job that didn't need doing, but you did it for the community when everybody else left disappointed on a personal level. If you're ever running for Jimbo's spot, just know you deserve it more than the presumptive heir. He or she will still (presumably) take it, but knowing is half the battle, and half a battle won is impossible to lose. Keep up the medium fight! InedibleHulk (talk) 02:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- It all boils down to a simple premise - administrators should be removing obstacles to make it easier for the encyclopedia to be improved. In the pre-bit days, I remember saying something like "I don't have a block button, all I've got is communication to make things work". Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Speaking of simple, I'm a dolt. Meant to say this to Rich Farmbrough. On the bright side, you're also cool, just for different reasons! InedibleHulk (talk) 01:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Holly Butcher
== Your submission at Articles for creation: Holly Butcher (March 13) ==
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Holly Butcher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Holly Butcher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Ritchie333!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KartikeyaS (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
|
- Please pardon but I am confused here? KartikeyaS (talk) 19:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Is it a bug or you really submitted yourself? Anyway, I made a self-revert[2]. Sorry for the trouble. KartikeyaS (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
With my thanks
Hi Richie! I just wanted to publicly thank you and Valereee for both your nomination and continued support through the RfA process! You helped out more than you could know. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Lee Vilenski, happy to welcome you on board! Now go move some DYK preps to queue lol --valereee (talk) 21:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Holly Butcher (March 14)
Don't template the regulars | ||
---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
|
- @DGG: Having an article declined at AfC does highlight problems with the process, but with 140 GAs I think I'll cope. Anyway, what exactly is wrong with the article; every sentence is cited to a reputable source and written factually and neutrally. I didn't realise an admin with nearly 100,000 edits is "new", but there you go. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- I apologize, but the real problem is the way our AfC templates work. I've asked many times for these templates to have a preview, so they can be edited before being sent--it would encourage people to actually look at them and modify them as needed. DGG ( talk ) 06:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Destubathon
Your 40 score for England will take some beating! Penny and Kosack are about to overtake you though in counties done! Wikipedia:The Great Britain and Ireland Destubathon/Scoreboard. I'm planning on running one for the SouthEast in May but only 10 days. I think it's best we run these contests for no more than 10 days in future and we can do more of them and remain comfortable doing it. It's difficult to commit to something every day for a month but 10 days you can really go for it and hope for the best. I'm thinking of doing two 10 day ones for the SouthEast and London in the summer.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Pandunia page
Hey you deleted a page for a conlang called Pandunia. The page was somewhat in its infancy since the language was still somewhat new. Based on the discussion for the deletion page, it seems it was deleted because most of the sources were from the website for the conlang itself. However, it has gotten some academic discussion and, given the small size of the conlanging community (especially for auxlangs), it's kinda a major conlang. There's a lot of community support. I hope to do some work on it as well. I was wondering what the process would be to reconsider its deletion since I think it was unfairly deleted and the discussion seemed to be dominated by people who weren't very familiar with the conlanging community — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tr3ndyBEAR (talk • contribs) 15:53, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Restore Offensive Security or as a draft, if available?
Following the red link from Offensive Security Certified Professional to create the page, the following message was shown: "A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below. 15:44, February 28, 2017 Ritchie333 talk contribs deleted page Offensive Security (A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)"... So... here is first contact... I don't know what the article contained before, but it's preferable to start from something than nothing. Thanks. -- Yae4 (talk) 09:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nevermind, FYI, Newslinger took care of this already. -- Yae4 (talk) 13:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
New message from Serial Number 54129
Message added 10:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
——SN54129 10:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke leads
Since a long time User:Krish990 consistently adds Rithvik Arora and Kaveri Priyam as Main leads along with the main leads Shaheer Sheikh and Rhea Sharma of Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke. Arora and Priyam actually play supporting role and not lead role which is even reflected in the category of their award won. Despite, he keeps specifying them as supporting role, he keeps them adding under main cast section stating their screentime while according to MOS:TVCAST they should come under recurring cast or supporting cast. Can you help me in stopping it as referred by User:Ravensfire Noobie anonymous (talk) 15:00, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ritchie333, this is a continuation of this report. At that time, Krish990 was edit-warring against a different user, now blocked as a sock. They've made very few posts discussing this and don't really seem to be interested in anything other than their edit remaining. I blew up at Krish990 on their talk page and have back away and have zero interest in returning (sorry, just not worth the stress to deal with an editor that doesn't appear to want to collaborate). Noobie anonymous has tried discussing in a couple of places but there's no real change. Normally I'd suggest WP:DRN, but I'm just not sure if that's a viable option here. Just my thoughts... Ravensfire (talk) 15:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Oxford Circus
Hello! Your submission of Oxford Circus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Revdel request
Hi Ritchie, could you revdel this addition please? I reverted this morning, but only just noticed that the editor included personal details in the post. Cheers. Chaheel Riens (talk) 17:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Chaheel Riens: that revision has been removed. — xaosflux Talk 17:04, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Proposed interaction ban
@User:Richie333. At 21:59 on 6 August 2018 you created a new section on the talk page of the former administrator User:Kudpung titled Baseless and shameful RfA votes [3]. Your edit began: I think it's off-topic for Jbh's RfA, but if somebody dragged Xxanthippe to ANI and proposed a one-way interaction ban with Megalibrarygirl, I would support it. You did not sign this edit but your edit history [4] shows that it was made by you. Can you advise me of the Wikipedia policies that led you to make this proposal for the interaction ban between myself and Megalibrarygirl? Xxanthippe (talk) 03:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC).
- Xxanthippe, since you pinged me - knowing full well I am in semi-retirement - I would certainly be happy to chime in here on Ritchie's behalf. And while you're about it, could you please have the courtesy to finally explain why you found it necessary to mention Wikimania 2020 on the arbcom case. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is a bit old to be bringing up again, Xxanthippe. What's going on to dredge it back up? I'd completely forgotten about the incident and moved on. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC)