Content deleted Content added
I am One of Many (talk | contribs) Notification: speedy deletion nomination of an attack page. (TW) |
DavidLeighEllis (talk | contribs) ←Replaced content with 'Your account was just blocked, forever. ~~~~' |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
{{message |
|||
| bgcolor = #FFC469 |
|||
| border-color = orange |
|||
| color = #5a3696 |
|||
| linkcolor = green(for "new message" link) |
|||
| extra-style = extra styles, like -moz-border-radius etc... |
|||
| width = 96% |
|||
}} |
|||
[[File:Venus-de-Laussel-vue-generale-noir.jpg]] |
|||
This should increase visitors to my page |
|||
[[File:Venus-de-Laussel-vue-generale-noir.png|350px|link=Category:Images|alt=]] |
|||
== March 2013 == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent editing history at [[:Recent African origin of modern humans]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[WP:BLOCK|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[WP:REVERT|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. |
|||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's [[WP:TALK|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. See [[WP:BRD|BRD]] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 06:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== edit warring == |
|||
does edit warring only count if you revert someones edit? Or are you only allowed to edit 3 times in 24 hours I am just curious [[User:Nottruelosa|Nottruelosa]] ([[User talk:Nottruelosa#top|talk]]) 01:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Have already posted to the talk page - Please keep in mind giving ultimatums (threats) to reintroduce contested content in a certain time is not a good idea - it may get you blocked for [[Wikipedia:Tendentious editing|tendentious editing]]. There is no rush - give others a chance to reply. I would revert the 48 hour thing you have posted - makes you look aggressive, confrontational and may only garner a response to the ultimatum over the data its-self. [[User:Moxy|Moxy]] ([[User talk:Moxy|talk]]) 02:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== re == |
|||
Its not a threat all I was saying is that if no one else helps us out within 48 hours we need to be creative and come up with a solution ourselves [[User:Nottruelosa|Nottruelosa]] ([[User talk:Nottruelosa#top|talk]]) 03:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC). If other people have a problem with that they can help us change it. If no one does we are entirely responsible for its content as it has been abandoned but all but 2 people Thank you [[User:Nottruelosa|Nottruelosa]] ([[User talk:Nottruelosa#top|talk]]) 03:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC). |
|||
::Took me hours of reading the report before I could reply - seems to me there taking about a shared primate ancestor - but thats what I see - thus will let others look it over as I retired from the field some 9 years ago now and find myself a bit behind. I have sent a few copies for others here to read over.[[User:Moxy|Moxy]] ([[User talk:Moxy|talk]]) 03:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Did you decide to place the y-chromsome adam article on the front page becausee of my edits. == |
|||
I am just curious, I think I was about the only in wikipedia who talked about this subject for the past few days and the frist one to start. Thank you [[User:Nottruelosa|Nottruelosa]] ([[User talk:Nottruelosa|talk]]) 01:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Sorry, no, I didn't see your comments about it before suggesting it for ITN :(. [[User:Thue|Thue]] ([[User talk:Thue|talk]]) 08:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== ITN Credit [[Y-chromosomal Adam]] == |
|||
{{tmbox |
|||
|tyle = notice |
|||
|small = |
|||
|image = [[File:Gnome globe current event.svg|30px|Current events globe]] |
|||
|text = On 06 March 2013, '''''[[:Template:In the news|In the news]]''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''[[Y-chromosomal Adam]]''''', which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the [[Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates|candidates page]]. |
|||
}}<!--Template:ITN notice--> |
|||
Enjoy. [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 23:10, 8 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Was wondering where that cute kitten came from. [[User:Medeis|μηδείς]] ([[User talk:Medeis|talk]]) 18:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== "Macro-Haplogroups" == |
|||
Hello, |
|||
Thank you for your efforts. The Y-Chromosome crowd is a contentiousness bunch. A few points. |
|||
First, the correct spelling is macrohaplogroup. It is not hyphenated. Please see this Google Scholar search for hundreds of examples. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=macrohaplogroup&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C44&as_sdtp= |
|||
Second, there is not a real difference between haplogroups, macrohaplogroups, and subclades. The different names quantify the size of the branch, but they are all branches on the tree. |
|||
Third, the names of SNPs are not hyphenated. I would dearly love to know who among the armature enthusiast crowd started the hyphenating trend. Wikipedia being a source based work needs to follow science. |
|||
Fourth, I am about to try to get the A-V148 article back to what it should be and start stubs for the parent branches. Please do not consider this an insult to your very nice effort. |
|||
Rebekah --[[User:RebekahThorn|RebekahThorn]] ([[User talk:RebekahThorn|talk]]) 10:24, 24 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==Table of haplogroups== |
|||
Hello. I have read [http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/vaop/ncurrent/extref/ejhg2013122x4.xls supplementary table 7] and I have not found in the third column of haplogroups any L(mtDNA).--[[User:Maulucioni|Maulucioni]] ([[User talk:Maulucioni|talk]]) 14:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:Thanks a lot for the sent image, you're right. However, the presence in Indonesia of typical African haplogroups (L3 & L0), do not endorse the theory of multiple origins.--[[User:Maulucioni|Maulucioni]] ([[User talk:Maulucioni|talk]]) 22:24, 26 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Maybe it wasnt L3 african variant maybe it was an asian variant of L3 that survived Toba.[[User:Nottruelosa|Nottruelosa]] ([[User talk:Nottruelosa#top|talk]]) 22:45, 26 June 2013 (UTC) Just like M and N, BUT NEVER TOOK OFF, AND IS VERY SMALL, EVEN NOW. |
|||
[[User:Nottruelosa|Nottruelosa]] ([[User talk:Nottruelosa#top|talk]]) 22:45, 26 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:It would be interesting. But Haplogroups L3 and L0a2a2 are typical Africans and they also found in the Middle East and Caribbean. To say what you say it must be demonstrated in a detailed study proving that there are ancient and unique subclades in Southeast Asia with an age of 70,000 years (Toba age).--[[User:Maulucioni|Maulucioni]] ([[User talk:Maulucioni|talk]]) 05:34, 27 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
L0a2a2 is definitely african, but L3 is a macrohaplogroup, they do not say what subclade so it could be a new branch or new branchs. ALl we know is it is L3xMN it could be MN? [[User:Nottruelosa|Nottruelosa]] ([[User talk:Nottruelosa#top|talk]]) 18:44, 27 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Behavior == |
|||
We have some basic conduct expectations from our editors please see [[Wikipedia:Expectations and norms of the Wikipedia community]] and for user pages guidelines pls see [[Wikipedia:User pages]].[[User:Moxy|Moxy]] ([[User talk:Moxy|talk]]) 23:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
yeah but can I put up slightly offensive stuff on my userpage? Is that okay? [[User:Nottruelosa|Nottruelosa]] ([[User talk:Nottruelosa#top|talk]]) 23:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC) I read that page alot and it did not say I can not have that word. [[User:Nottruelosa|Nottruelosa]] ([[User talk:Nottruelosa#top|talk]]) 00:00, 17 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
==July 2013== |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Please do not create pages that [[Wikipedia:Attack_page|attack, threaten, or disparage]] their subject. Attack pages and files '''are not tolerated''' by Wikipedia and are [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedily deleted]]. Users who create or add such material may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:Db-attack-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:I am One of Many|I am One of Many]] ([[User talk:I am One of Many|talk]]) 00:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:04, 17 July 2013
Your account was just blocked, forever. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)