Morton devonshire (talk | contribs) revert vandalism |
m →Nope |
||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
(UI)Hi Beatty, Happy New Year. My main source of info on apocalyptic Christians are the believers themselves, through their own writings on sites like Rapture Ready, along with other Christian sites like [http://www.ministrywatch.com/mw2.1/F_SumRpt.asp?EIN=741986308 Ministry Watch]. I also rely on the claims of various Christian ministries who disagree with each other over particular end times prophecies. They don't pull any punches! I think that AP article is an accurate portrayal. If you want to continue this discussion, feel free to post on my talk page. - [[User:Fairness And Accuracy For All|Fairness And Accuracy For All]] 06:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC) |
(UI)Hi Beatty, Happy New Year. My main source of info on apocalyptic Christians are the believers themselves, through their own writings on sites like Rapture Ready, along with other Christian sites like [http://www.ministrywatch.com/mw2.1/F_SumRpt.asp?EIN=741986308 Ministry Watch]. I also rely on the claims of various Christian ministries who disagree with each other over particular end times prophecies. They don't pull any punches! I think that AP article is an accurate portrayal. If you want to continue this discussion, feel free to post on my talk page. - [[User:Fairness And Accuracy For All|Fairness And Accuracy For All]] 06:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
{{NPA}} |
|||
== Nope == |
|||
I am removing the personal attacks against me on this page. They violate Wikipedia's policy. This is not vandalism. According to the Wikipedia policy |
|||
{{NPA}} |
|||
Hi Morton Devonshire. NYScholar is not me, as far as I know NYScholar is always logged in, but I haven't studied the issue extensively. NYScholar is well meaning, but sort of fixed and new to Wikipedia. He's been one of the more fair editors of the article though, as it has been subject to various POV attacks from many directions. He is sort of a hard ass though, as you notice. It's best not to attack him outright in that he isn't POV pushing just being an independently minded hard ass. I've pushed to reorganize the article before in GabrielF's spirit but was rebuffed by NYScholar and others. <strike>BTW what do you think of GabrielF's suggestions?</strike> I guess you agree with him, just you want a shorter article and that is where we disagree, as you based your shortened article on my previous suggestion. --[[User:70.51.228.233|70.51.228.233]] 21:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
one is encouraged to removed such personal attacks on Wikipedia users, including oneself. That is what I am doing. Do not re-post these attacks. Read the policy. --NYScholar 04:28, 12 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:The article's strangeness is due to NYScholar, the strange contents and the follow up public presentations and the non-topical ordering. But NYScholar is very conscientious and fair. Thus, I would ask that you go easy on him and base your concerns on established Wikipedia policy, as he is very partial to it -- for example, in the past I have tried to reorder the last three sections and NYScholar reverted based on Wikipedia policy, and he was right, check it yourself. I tend to mimic other people's edit summaries, if that is what got you. --[[User:70.51.228.233|70.51.228.233]] 21:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::Funny, I just checked the edit summaries for similar and they aren't that similar, but my first today edits were to NYScholar's pages. But they were both in response to the conflict between him and you and GabrielF. I warned him of the situation, to back off and I moved some barnstars to his user page from his talk page so that both you and GabrielF realize that he is a valued contributor. I can see how this will mess with your mind given your history, it wasn't intentional, its simply that I have a dynamic IP and am somewhat protective of NYScholar. Also removed unintended comma in first comment to clarify potentially problematic meaning. --[[User:70.51.228.233|70.51.228.233]] 22:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
:::I should state that I often think that NYScholar is autistic or borderline autistic. In fact, he is an individual that you can attack, he'll respond and then you can claim he is disruptive and you'll get him banned quite easily because his social awareness seemed to be reduced. --[[User:64.230.127.30|64.230.127.30]] 03:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
::::I'm not interested in getting anyone banned. He just seems to be too invested in his version of the article, and too enthralled with the importance of the book. I respect President Carter, but foreign policy has never been his strong suit. [[User:Morton devonshire|The Illuminated Master of USEBACA]] 04:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:28, 12 January 2007
+ | This user likes getting friendly notices. |
Please sign your comments. To make a new section, click , or just add a section to the bottom of the page. Remember to use a meaningful header.
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Morton_devonshire. |
![]() |
Contents
Happy Holidays!File:TinFoilHat Superfriends.jpg
New Pearlplease see talk: The New Pearl Harbor — Xiutwel (talk) 12:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC) pink piggyThanks for the pink piggy box, it looks pretty cool! :) Umeboshi 22:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC) A noticeboard sure is quicker than waiting for the daily shortwave numbers station broadcast from Illuminati master control. Thanks for the note, nice video. --Dual Freq 01:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Ahoy matey!
Rosenkreuz = Sockpuppet of Morton DevonshireBoth allegedly Jesuit-educated Wikipedians with PhDs, and know-it-all, hysterical blow-hards on the same topics, among other evidence. Check out their various contributions and the timing thereof. User:Rosenkreuz is Morton's over-the-top "I say, old chap, oh-such-an-Englishman, tea and crumpets, "S'wounds!" manifestation. --Tangerine5000 16:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
By the way, that PhD business is pretty funny, since in reality, you're really going for a first degree in law (and you're a pot-head). I think you are probably in Edinburgh. --Tangerine5000 17:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Morton devonshire, I am requesting your commentsI have just filed a formal complaint against BenBurch and F.A.A.F.A., alleging that they have formed a cabal or meatpuppet partnership, in violation of WP:CABAL. I notice that you have encountered their special brand of tag-team intimidation in the past, and I encourage you to comment on your experiences at the page I have linked above, during the investigation. Thank you for your input. ArlingtonTX 20:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Cabal Free!
Just like the vegetables I buy are guaranteed to be "100% Organically Grown", my user space is now certified to be '100% Cabal Free'! I'll send the Cabal Inspection Crew around to check out yours Morty. (hint.... slip him a 20) Happy New Year! - F.A.A.F.A. 00:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC) ThanksBro, i appreciate your comment. From the very begging when you called me "the energizer bunny" i took you for a good guy with good intentions. And your efforts to claim some kind of justice by trying to un-delete the Islamic afd board is appreciate. But I'm a bit worn down, i have had enough of controversies and trying to go against the stream. Right now, i'm trying to save a site that is #1 Shi'a site according to both google and yahoo, google giving it a page ranks of 8, but is nevertheless deleted as non-notable... im not even upset. We have already created Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam to have somewhere... and guess what? It' pathetic. I'm sure you believe you are doing good by deleting articles like this, this and this... even though they fulfill all criteria for inclusion. I Guess things need to go this way, those articles need to be deleted, so that people in the future can look at them and wonder at human nature. So that is the way it is, i now understand that there is no point in trying to hold a to large burden, it's useless if the time is not right. So, thanks for the message, i see you as a brother in humanity... and i don't care for the Muslim related afd page anymore. I'm used to be against everybody, you know, im a 1) Muslim 2) "CT" 3) 4 Shi'a 5) living in the west. Sorry for the late answer, the whole issue seems so meaningless. Peace.--Striver - talk 14:00, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
You might be interested in...this: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Blocked_User:Fluffbrain. Jayjg (talk) 05:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC) F.Y.I.Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center (3rd). TheOnlyChoice 22:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Free speech zoneFree speech zone is currently a featured article candidate. I'm a bit worried about whether the people cited are reliable sources. Would you be able to have a look at it? Also, there's some discussion on whether Religion of Peace should be a redirect to Little Green Footballs. Andjam 00:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Left you a friendly messageBecause I'm a friendly guy, and you're a friendly guy, I left you a friendly message on my friend NU's talk page. - Fairness And Accuracy For Friendly Folks 23:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
(UI)Hi Beatty, Happy New Year. My main source of info on apocalyptic Christians are the believers themselves, through their own writings on sites like Rapture Ready, along with other Christian sites like Ministry Watch. I also rely on the claims of various Christian ministries who disagree with each other over particular end times prophecies. They don't pull any punches! I think that AP article is an accurate portrayal. If you want to continue this discussion, feel free to post on my talk page. - Fairness And Accuracy For All 06:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
|