Content deleted Content added
Ashot Arzumanyan (talk | contribs) →RfC: new section |
→RfC: no thanks |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::[[Talk:Stepanakert_Airport#RfC:_Is_Polukhov.27s_statement_worth_being_kept_in_the_article.3F|RfC: Is Polukhov's statement worth being kept in the article?]] |
::[[Talk:Stepanakert_Airport#RfC:_Is_Polukhov.27s_statement_worth_being_kept_in_the_article.3F|RfC: Is Polukhov's statement worth being kept in the article?]] |
||
Thanks in advance. --[[User:Ashot Arzumanyan|<span style="background:#913100;color:#EDEDED" vlink="color:#EDEDED">''' '''Ashot''' </span>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ashot Arzumanyan|<span style="color:#913100">talk</span>]])</sup> 17:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks in advance. --[[User:Ashot Arzumanyan|<span style="background:#913100;color:#EDEDED" vlink="color:#EDEDED">''' '''Ashot''' </span>]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Ashot Arzumanyan|<span style="color:#913100">talk</span>]])</sup> 17:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
:No thanks, as I've said previously neither side in these discussion are willing to listen, and they will only read the parts that favour their partisan position and ignore that which supports anything different. I do not have the time to become embroiled right now. Good luck. <sup>[[User:Khukri|'''<font face="verdana" color=#6633cc>Khu</font>''']][[User_talk:Khukri|'''<font face="verdana" color=#CC66FF>kri</font>''']]</sup> 21:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:52, 13 May 2011
Committed identity: Edit page for string which is an SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity. |
Note: for any messages you leave on my talk pages I will respond here, if I have left a message on your pages, you may reply there and I will keep an eye on your page for a couple of days. If you do not sign your posts with ~~~~ I may delete them. |
RfC
Dear Khukri,
Could you please comment on the following:
Thanks in advance. -- Ashot (talk) 17:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- No thanks, as I've said previously neither side in these discussion are willing to listen, and they will only read the parts that favour their partisan position and ignore that which supports anything different. I do not have the time to become embroiled right now. Good luck. Khukri 21:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)