KelleyCook (talk | contribs) →iPhone: another day, another editor claims repression |
JCDenton2052 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
:Simple, The unsourced and unconfirmed monthly price increase is what is non-notable. If you want to bring in a [[WP:Third opinion]], feel free. Also you might note that I did not report you for the [[WP:3RR]] as I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you (again) improperly reverted the page without reading your message yet. |
:Simple, The unsourced and unconfirmed monthly price increase is what is non-notable. If you want to bring in a [[WP:Third opinion]], feel free. Also you might note that I did not report you for the [[WP:3RR]] as I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you (again) improperly reverted the page without reading your message yet. |
||
:Moreover your continual rants against me are getting irksome. Of course, you can do what you wish, but I would advocate removing me from your watchlist your last eight edits and sizeable percentage over the past week all have to do directly with my edits. -- [[User:KelleyCook|KelleyCook]] ([[User talk:KelleyCook#top|talk]]) 19:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC) |
:Moreover your continual rants against me are getting irksome. Of course, you can do what you wish, but I would advocate removing me from your watchlist your last eight edits and sizeable percentage over the past week all have to do directly with my edits. -- [[User:KelleyCook|KelleyCook]] ([[User talk:KelleyCook#top|talk]]) 19:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
::At least part of the price increase and the controversy are both well sourced. You made three reverts before I did. You aren't on my watchlist, however you continue to revert my edits by quoting Wikipedia policies that you clearly haven't read. [[User:JCDenton2052|JCDenton2052]] ([[User talk:JCDenton2052|talk]]) 19:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== {{tlf|Musgal}} == |
== {{tlf|Musgal}} == |
Revision as of 19:46, 16 June 2008
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Template:USRD-news-subscription
Please remove Pinouts.ru link spam
Seems that the pinouts.ru website has link-spammed 89 Wikipedia pages.
A quick investigation shows that this site was started in 2004 replicating the content of historical sites such as HardwareBook and Technick.net (now moved to AllPinous.org). But the worse thing is that some pinouts.ru pages are replicating the Wikipedia content, violating the GNU Free Documentation License (i.e.:. http://pinouts.ru/Slots/apple_adb_pinout.shtml). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.203.190.226 (talk) 11:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- pinouts.ru is not link spam, but its information generally should be integrated into the article (and possibly referenced from there) and not in a External Link section. Meanwhile your open proxy has been closed. -- KelleyCook (talk) 17:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
FairPlay
Hi, I found this edit of yours: [1]. When you find an error, why don't you fix it instead of just deleting everything? Don't you think that deleting information others have entered is kind of bad? Paluv (talk) 12:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- Reply at User talk:Paluv. -- KelleyCook (talk) 14:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thank you very much for your reply. It would be great if you could add the information yourself, as you suggested. Finding a reference at a regular webserver is difficult, though, as the creator is afraid of repercussions by Apple and so he made his website a freenet host (so the url doesn't start with http, and you need a special program to see it. URL is: [freenet:USK@GSQgFDoeQUG0cSkbUVYYkB-ssqEEavRdo-RDVEAm0jk,rVvV3LjSZq3UNdGJrrup~~ZBPq4ohBhJeKkREXDLULw,AQACAAE/requiem/-1/]). The program really exists, and works, though - I've tried it out. The only other link I have found is at "the pirate bay", and I'm not sure whether we can make links to that place, as there is a lot of illegal software distribution going on there (URL: [2]). Thanks for your help. Paluv (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
April 2008
In my talk page you wrote: Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. I'm sorry, but if you just had bothered to check the iPhone article history you could have noticed that I never added anything to it. At some point I just removed two words that I identified as (and really are) wishful thinking. Next time please check the facts before launching false accusations, personal attacks, groundless and ridicuolus Request for Comments and so forth. Thank you. Femmina (talk) 23:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Oh, well, disregard the above. I'm becoming senile. Forgetting things and all. I already commented to you on the same thing [3] a month ago, but I never received a proper reply (did I?) and so I forgot that I already wrote to you altoghether. I didn't log in for some time after that discussion and I didn't notice the RfC you wrote about me until yesterday or so. Nice thing you made. Femmina (talk) 00:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
802.11a
Hi, after you submitted the 802.11 page another guy (Strength of Nations) added a comparison chart with the speed and range different wifi standards use/have.
The strangest thing however is while 802.11g and 802.11n use the same frequency for transmitting (2,4Ghz) he claims it should have almost twice the range (outdoor 250m vs. 140m).
Do you think he's correct in this assumption or should the page be edited? Thank you. Iberned (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Splitting of The O2
Hi KelleyCook. I noticed that you have started a proposal to split part of the article, The O2. I just thought I should let you know that I have started a discussion regarding this on the article's talk page. Thanks. Tbo 157(talk) 18:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
iPhone 3G
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally while discussion about it is underway, as you did to iPhone 3G. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JCDenton2052 (talk • contribs) 17:13, June 10, 2008 (UTC)
iPhone
Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: iPhone. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. My username is JCDenton2052, not "the troll" JCDenton2052 (talk) 23:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- It wasn't your edit that I was referring to. -- KelleyCook (talk) 15:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- The why was it my edit you reverted? JCDenton2052 (talk) 19:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as iPhone. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. Please read WP:Consensus JCDenton2052 (talk) 23:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- It would be really hard to own iPhone page as there are over 6 million users. And please note that *I* wasn't the one who tried to change the entire tense of the article; that would be you. And I'll also note that you found ZERO supporters on the talk page for those particular changes. -- KelleyCook (talk) 15:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Your blind reverts introduced a spelling error and are not WP:NPOV, e.g. "A distinguishing feature is that the". JCDenton2052 (talk) 19:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article iPhone has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Please read WP:NOTCATALOG#DIRECTORY, specifically "therefore prices of a product should not be quoted in an article unless the price can be sourced and there is a justified reason for its mention." The prices are available from several WP:RS and several WP:RS document the controversy. Also read WP:CRYSTAL, specifically "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." How can you argue that the launch of the iPhone 3G is non-notable or unlikely to take place? JCDenton2052 (talk) 19:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Simple, The unsourced and unconfirmed monthly price increase is what is non-notable. If you want to bring in a WP:Third opinion, feel free. Also you might note that I did not report you for the WP:3RR as I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you (again) improperly reverted the page without reading your message yet.
- Moreover your continual rants against me are getting irksome. Of course, you can do what you wish, but I would advocate removing me from your watchlist your last eight edits and sizeable percentage over the past week all have to do directly with my edits. -- KelleyCook (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- At least part of the price increase and the controversy are both well sourced. You made three reverts before I did. You aren't on my watchlist, however you continue to revert my edits by quoting Wikipedia policies that you clearly haven't read. JCDenton2052 (talk) 19:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
{{Musgal}}
Thanks for your contribution to {{convert}}. I'm just letting you know that per discussions on the template talk page the template is moving away from using metric prefixes with non-metric units to e-notation instead. Therefore the code Musgal
has been replaced with e6U.S.gal
(or e6USgal
without the dots). Codes for thousands, billions & trillions ("short scale") of US gallons are also available as are codes for thousands, millions, etc. of imperial gallons. JIMp talk·cont 06:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Article naming
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people) calls for us to avoid additional identifiers (like "Father") unless needed for disambiguation. What guideline are you following for moving articles? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 18:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I hadn't fully read that page. I was following the rule of "name a person is best known by" and knew that their was a page named Father Damien — which was a WP:featured article. Accordingly, I have put the page name back. -- KelleyCook (talk) 18:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. It's hard to keep track of all the guidelines and policies, which don't even stay the same from day to day. In the case of Father Damien it was promoted to FA back in 2004, when many of these policies were still being developed. Anyway, thanks for your prompt response and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.