Daedalus969 (talk | contribs) Reverted good faith edits by Declan Davis; Rv repeat of message, no need to repeat it here. (TW) |
9258fahsflkh917fas (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
Hi, I know that you are a significant contributor to the article on [[Same-sex marriage]], and that you have a dispute with TheFix63 over the lead section. Having looked at both sections, I find TheFix63's version to be more neutral than the existing version, as I explain in depth on the talk page, [[Talk:Same-sex marriage]]. You seem determined to revert any changes made to the lead until they are discussed, so I will not change it at this time. Instead, I eagerly await your opinion on the talk page. Thanks in advance for reading and considering my opinion! [[User:Rising*From*Ashes|Rising*From*Ashes]] ([[User talk:Rising*From*Ashes|talk]]) 01:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, I know that you are a significant contributor to the article on [[Same-sex marriage]], and that you have a dispute with TheFix63 over the lead section. Having looked at both sections, I find TheFix63's version to be more neutral than the existing version, as I explain in depth on the talk page, [[Talk:Same-sex marriage]]. You seem determined to revert any changes made to the lead until they are discussed, so I will not change it at this time. Instead, I eagerly await your opinion on the talk page. Thanks in advance for reading and considering my opinion! [[User:Rising*From*Ashes|Rising*From*Ashes]] ([[User talk:Rising*From*Ashes|talk]]) 01:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Page blanking == |
|||
Deleting the contents of your talk page is considered very bad form. It is much better to archive any talk discussions. <font face="Kristen ITC"><font color="#FF6600">~~</font> <font color="#006600">[[User:Declan Davis#top|Dr Dec]]</font> <font color="#009999">([[User talk:Declan Davis|Talk]])</font> <font color="#000099"> </font> <font color="#FF6600">~~</font></font> 23:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:46, 30 August 2009
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here.
|
|
||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
- News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
- Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:42, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
CSDing of Irish Peers
I am a little concerned by your CSD tagging of the recent spate of "O'Brien" late medieval Irish Lords. While it may seem that someone is creating a family tree of articles, each on its own could arguably pass WP:POLITICIAN, as Irish peers were the major national legislators of the time (Irish House of Lords) also, being an Irish Peer is likely an "indication of significance" in terms of WP:CSD#A7. I'm not majorly concerned, but I would be pleased if you revisited the taggings. Cheers. Fribbler (talk) 00:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi
Sorry, I wasn't aware that users were allowed to remove warnings from their own talk pages. Won't happen again... though I do think that doing so confuses admins who might not be aware how many times a user has been warned before. GSMR (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Green Sheet
Hey, Daedalus969? It's me, Green Sheet. Look, I'm really sorry about the proper nouns. I JUST DON'T LIKE YOU ANNOYING ME SO MUCH!!! But on the other hand, I guess you're right. I'm just not sure how things work. I'm still new at this Wikipedian stuff. I just thought it would look better like that. But now I know. However, I'll only captialize them if they're part of a name or title. If you want to leave me a message, just come to my talk page. Oh, and one more thing...thanks. Green Sheet (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
The good faith removal of {{ec}} from a talk page does not constitute a violation of policy. However, WP:TPO is very clear in stating "Do not strike out or delete the comments of other editors without their permission." Could you please explain why you deleted my comments? 69.117.250.169 (talk) 01:27, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- I re-added it. Please do not remove the (edit conflict) tag.— Dædαlus Contribs 01:58, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
My Jung changes
Dear Daedalus,
Please help me, or perhaps explain further why interpreting Jung's description of Hitler and his followers as 'drunk' and 'warlike' is considered 'original research'. If Jung used those terms positively elsewhere, I'd like to be pointed in that direction. Jung was a great scholar; he deserves at least to be supported with evidence when accused of so heinous a crime as Nazism.
Thanks for your time,
Gaz.
PS I think the wiki- is pretty good. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gary pratt (talk • contribs) 10:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Good call
As you see, the SPI was right on point. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:53, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppet "news"
Please refrain from posting "news" of editor blocks to article talk pages, especially ones where they didn't influence an official process (AFD, RFC, etc.). //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 01:29, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Same-sex marriage
Hi, I know that you are a significant contributor to the article on Same-sex marriage, and that you have a dispute with TheFix63 over the lead section. Having looked at both sections, I find TheFix63's version to be more neutral than the existing version, as I explain in depth on the talk page, Talk:Same-sex marriage. You seem determined to revert any changes made to the lead until they are discussed, so I will not change it at this time. Instead, I eagerly await your opinion on the talk page. Thanks in advance for reading and considering my opinion! Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 01:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Page blanking
Deleting the contents of your talk page is considered very bad form. It is much better to archive any talk discussions. ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 23:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)