{{subst:coin-notice}} ~~~~ |
Warning: Edit warring. (TW) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion== |
==Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion== |
||
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard]] regarding a possible [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]] incident with which you may be involved. <!--Template:coin-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Rentier|Rentier]] ([[User talk:Rentier|talk]]) 14:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC) |
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard]] regarding a possible [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]] incident with which you may be involved. <!--Template:coin-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Rentier|Rentier]] ([[User talk:Rentier|talk]]) 14:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
== September 2017 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome to Wikipedia]]. You appear to be repeatedly [[Help:Reverting|reverting or undoing]] other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]" and is usually seen as obstructing the [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|normal editing process]], as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] on the [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]]. |
|||
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Rentier|Rentier]] ([[User talk:Rentier|talk]]) 17:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:35, 2 September 2017
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Rentier (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
September 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Rentier (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)