→No need to be overly sarcastic: more... |
Aheadnovel55 (talk | contribs) Warning |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nazi_Party&diff=219076369&oldid=219076009 this edit], and Alex's polite request above: please be aware that the [[WP:CIVIL|civility policy]] is a non-negotiable requirement. I'd greatly appreciate it if you could tone down your language in discussions. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome|talk]]) 13:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC) |
Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nazi_Party&diff=219076369&oldid=219076009 this edit], and Alex's polite request above: please be aware that the [[WP:CIVIL|civility policy]] is a non-negotiable requirement. I'd greatly appreciate it if you could tone down your language in discussions. -- [[User:The Anome|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome|talk]]) 13:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Warning== |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Generalplan Ost|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Generalplan Ost]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Aheadnovel55|Aheadnovel55]] ([[User talk:Aheadnovel55|talk]]) 17:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:52, 13 June 2008
Welcome!
Hello, Captain Obvious and his crime-fighting dog, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -- Longhair\talk 05:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Proper use of "minor" edits
Please only use minor (m) edits when you are only correcting a minor spelling or grammaticial error in a Wikipedia article which does not change, reduce, or expand the meaning, context, or voice of an article. In recent edits (see: Ochota_massacre) you have made substantial additions to articles and flagged the edits as "minor." This is incorrect. Please see: Help:Minor edit. Pollenberg (talk) 05:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Zivia Lubetkin
Welcome aboard, Cap'n! I appreciate your pitching in with clean-up edits on the Zivia Lubetkin page. You're welcome to raid my User page for formatting ideas if you like, and if there's any help I can offer, feel free to ask. -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 17:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. --Captain Obvious and his crime-fighting dog (talk) 20:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Category:Physician who died in Nazi concentration camps
Hi there, you'll need to post a Speedy-CFR notice at Category:Physician who died in Nazi concentration camps following the directions at the Speedy Renaming page. Nothing can happen until it's properly tagged. Cheers, Cgingold (talk) 03:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Good articles
I think your should study Wikipedia:Guide for nominating good articles and think what else could be improved. As soon as you decide that everything is O'K, we can go ahead and try the nomination. Both articles look too big, and maybe some sub-articles could be created, although I am not quite sure. Unfortunately, I do not have enough time for that. Good job with Moscow theater hostage crisis! Biophys (talk) 03:46, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on International response to the Beslan hostage crisis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ŵïllî§ï$2 (Talk!/Cont.) 20:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Beslan school hostage crisis. Thank you. E_dog95' Hi ' 20:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
No need to be overly sarcastic
This one was unneeded, the whole drama could be avoided if you would discuss substance of your changes instead. Please re-read WP:CIVIL and WP:BITE Alex Bakharev (talk) 01:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, and Alex's polite request above: please be aware that the civility policy is a non-negotiable requirement. I'd greatly appreciate it if you could tone down your language in discussions. -- The Anome (talk) 13:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Generalplan Ost. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Aheadnovel55 (talk) 17:52, 13 June 2008 (UTC)